Comparison of Intralase and Visumax Femtosecond Laser for Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
NCT ID: NCT01252654
Last Updated: 2016-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-01-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Comparing SMILE and LASIK
NCT01216475
Visumax Femtolasik Versus Moria M2 Microkeratome in Myopia
NCT03193411
Lower Femtosecond Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia
NCT03111160
Comparison of a Laser Keratome to a Mechanical Microkeratome
NCT00366574
Use of the VisuMax™ Femtosecond Laser
NCT01638390
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 IntraLase flaps
Patients who have undergone flap creation with IntraLase laser
No interventions assigned to this group
2 Visumax flaps
Patients who have undergone flaps created with Visumax laser
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cycloplegic spherical equivalent of \>-1.00D
* Refractive cylinder -4.00 D or less.
* Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 6/12 or better in BOTH eyes.
* Spherical or cylindrical error has progressed at -0.50D or less per year from date of baseline measurement.
* Contact lens wearers must have removed contact lenses at least two (2) weeks before the baseline measurement.
* No evidence of irregular astigmatism on corneal topography.
* Available to attend post-operative examinations for a 3 month period.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinical or corneal topographic evidence of keratoconus.
* Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease such as uveitis, severe dry eyes, severe allergic eye disease, glaucoma, visually significant cataract and retinal disease.
* Previous corneal surgery or trauma within the corneal flap zone.
* Patent corneal vascularization within 1mm of the corneal flap zone.
* Taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing, such as corticosteroids and antimetabolites.
* Systemically immunocompromised.
* Systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, connective tissue disease and severe atopy.
* Pregnant or nursing.
21 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore Eye Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jodhbir Mehta
Head Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donald Tan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore National Eye Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore National Eye Centre
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
D'Souza S, Petznick A, Tong L, Hall RC, Rosman M, Chan C, Koh SK, Beuerman RW, Zhou L, Mehta JS. Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 6;55(6):3396-402. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14113.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Other
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
R683/33/2009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.