Comparison of Cross-cylinder and Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy(PRK) in Correcting Medium-high Astigmatism
NCT ID: NCT00663923
Last Updated: 2012-03-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-11-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Application of Phototherapeutic Keratectomy Mode to Mark the Axis of Astigmatism
NCT06694051
Wavefront-guided Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) Versus Wavefront-guided Lasik for Myopia
NCT01140594
Comparison of Conventional and Custom Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
NCT00713856
A Comparison of Fellow Eyes Undergoing LASIK or PRK With a Wavefront-guided Excimer Laser Versus a Wavefront-optimized Excimer Laser
NCT01135719
A Comparison of PRK and LASIK for Correction of Myopia
NCT00404105
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cross-cylinder
In this technique the laser is programmed with the axis and amount of cylinder,so that the steepest meridian is flattened with central cylindrical ablation and the flattest meridian steepens with paracentral ablation
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism
single
In this technique ,cylinder is treated only on one meridian by performing an elliptical ablation to to flatten the steeper meridian to match the flatter meridian.
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* refractive stability for at least one year
* regular and symmetric astigmatism of \>1.5 diopters
Exclusion Criteria
* keratoconus or suspected keratoconus
* active ocular disease and systemic collagen disease
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tabriz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohammad R Sedghipoor, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ophthalmology Department, Tabriz University of medical Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nikookari eye hospital
Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
86-43
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.