Comparison of Cross-cylinder and Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy(PRK) in Correcting Medium-high Astigmatism

NCT ID: NCT00663923

Last Updated: 2012-03-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether cross-cylinder approach is more effective than routine method in laser correction of astigmatism.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Both eyes of 50 patients(100 eyes) with medium-high compound myopic astigmatism and inclusion criteria,will be treated by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using excimer laser.It breaks chemical bonds within corneal stroma.It's wavelength is 193 nm that is in the ultraviolets range with high energy and very low tissue penetrance. The right or left eye of every patient would be allocated randomly to one of the study groups using RandList 1.1. In spite of recent advances in excimer laser machines and surgical techniques,correction of astigmatism is not more successful compared to myopia. In this study we will compare two methods of laser correction of astigmatism regarding to visual acuity,residual error and aberrations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Astigmatism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cross-cylinder

In this technique the laser is programmed with the axis and amount of cylinder,so that the steepest meridian is flattened with central cylindrical ablation and the flattest meridian steepens with paracentral ablation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism

single

In this technique ,cylinder is treated only on one meridian by performing an elliptical ablation to to flatten the steeper meridian to match the flatter meridian.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

comparison of PRK by cross-cylinder approach in one eye and conventional (single) method in the other eye for laser correction of astigmatism

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

photoastigmatic keratectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>20 years of age
* refractive stability for at least one year
* regular and symmetric astigmatism of \>1.5 diopters

Exclusion Criteria

* corneal thickness\<470 microns
* keratoconus or suspected keratoconus
* active ocular disease and systemic collagen disease
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tabriz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammad R Sedghipoor, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ophthalmology Department, Tabriz University of medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nikookari eye hospital

Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iran

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

86-43

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Topography-guided LASIK Surgery
NCT03292419 COMPLETED NA