A Cardiac Registry to Evaluate and Manage the hsTnI Categorical CVD Risk in Subjects Undergoing Preventive Health Checks (PHC).
NCT ID: NCT04903041
Last Updated: 2025-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
300000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-12
2030-09-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Yield of Cardiac CT to Detect Cardiac Thrombi in Acute Ischemic Stroke: an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
NCT07165093
Evaluation of Patients With Known or Suspected Heart Disease
NCT00001313
Cardiac Biomarkers and Analytical Methods
NCT05781724
Registry of Bleeding Risk in Real World Chinese Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients-II
NCT03402711
A Registry Study of Biomarkers in Ischemic Heart Disease ( BIOMS-IHD )
NCT05965882
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditional cardiovascular risk prediction does not identify everyone who will develop cardiovascular disease with up to 50% of individuals having none or only one risk factor at the time of diagnosis. Although traditional risk estimations perform moderately well, there remain significant limitations in their use in the prevention of cardiovascular disease especially at an individual level. At an individual level, the clinician not only needs to correctly identify those at increased risk, but also weigh up the importance of each risk factor and determine who needs medical therapy in addition to lifestyle advice Many risk estimation systems in existence are based on a core set of cardiovascular risk factors and based on participants either selected randomly from the general population or those attending their general practitioner. All these risk scoring systems show a good level of discrimination, for cardiovascular events, with the area under the receiving operator curve ranging from 0.73 to 0.82. However, adopting these risk scoring systems to guide current clinical practice has limitations. First, most of these scoring systems, except QRISK1 and QRISK2 have been developed from old prospective cohorts with participants recruited in the 1980's and 1990's Second, applying risk estimation scores to regions with different rates of baseline rates of cardiovascular disease will lead to either under- or over-estimation of risk: a result of mis-calibration. Third, the value of incorporating new risk factors including biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C reactive protein has been disappointing in improving discrimination, with age and sex alone contributing to 0.70 of the area under the receiver operating curve statistic. None of these risk estimation scores, to date, incorporate a direct measure of cardiac injury such as cardiac troponin and its potential role in guiding primary prevention in a contemporaneous population remains uncertain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Lipid profiles ordered
3. HbA1c ordered
4. Creatinine ordered
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited
OTHER
Jaime Marino
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jaime Marino
Sr Medical Affairs Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pratap C Reddy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Apollo Hopsitals
Hari Prasad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited
Abraham Oomman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited
Padma Madala, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited
Jaganathan Sickan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Abbott
Agim Beshiri, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Abbott
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Apollo Hospitals
Bangalore, , India
Apollo Hospitals
Chennai, , India
Apollo Hospitals
Hyderabad, , India
Apollo Hospitals
Kolkata, , India
Apollo Hospitals
Mumbai, , India
Apollo Hospitals
New Delhi, , India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lankeit M, Jimenez D, Kostrubiec M, Dellas C, Hasenfuss G, Pruszczyk P, Konstantinides S. Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective validation study. Circulation. 2011 Dec 13;124(24):2716-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.051177. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
Xue Y, Clopton P, Peacock WF, Maisel AS. Serial changes in high-sensitive troponin I predict outcome in patients with decompensated heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jan;13(1):37-42. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq210. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
Rosjo H, Varpula M, Hagve TA, Karlsson S, Ruokonen E, Pettila V, Omland T; FINNSEPSIS Study Group. Circulating high sensitivity troponin T in severe sepsis and septic shock: distribution, associated factors, and relation to outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan;37(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2051-x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
Afonso L, Bandaru H, Rathod A, Badheka A, Ali Kizilbash M, Zmily H, Jacobsen G, Chattahi J, Mohamad T, Koneru J, Flack J, Weaver WD. Prevalence, determinants, and clinical significance of cardiac troponin-I elevation in individuals admitted for a hypertensive emergency. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):551-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00476.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
Hoiseth AD, Neukamm A, Karlsson BD, Omland T, Brekke PH, Soyseth V. Elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T is associated with increased mortality after acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2011 Sep;66(9):775-81. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.153122. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
de Lemos JA, Drazner MH, Omland T, Ayers CR, Khera A, Rohatgi A, Hashim I, Berry JD, Das SR, Morrow DA, McGuire DK. Association of troponin T detected with a highly sensitive assay and cardiac structure and mortality risk in the general population. JAMA. 2010 Dec 8;304(22):2503-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1768.
deFilippi CR, de Lemos JA, Christenson RH, Gottdiener JS, Kop WJ, Zhan M, Seliger SL. Association of serial measures of cardiac troponin T using a sensitive assay with incident heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in older adults. JAMA. 2010 Dec 8;304(22):2494-502. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1708. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
Meune C, Reichlin T, Irfan A, Schaub N, Twerenbold R, Meissner J, Reiter M, Luthi A, Haaf P, Balmelli C, Drexler B, Winkler K, Hochholzer W, Osswald S, Mueller C. How safe is the outpatient management of patients with acute chest pain and mildly increased cardiac troponin concentrations? Clin Chem. 2012 May;58(5):916-24. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.178053. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACCR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.