The Early Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (Baby FACES 2018)
NCT ID: NCT04897789
Last Updated: 2021-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
6723 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-01
2023-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey
NCT03842111
The 2021-2022 Study of Family and Staff Well-Being in Head Start AIAN FACES Programs
NCT06510218
2019 National Survey of Early Care and Education
NCT03947593
2024 National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE)
NCT05987137
Healthy Outcomes of Pregnancy Education
NCT00381823
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Baby FACES team will carry out a descriptive study that includes a nationally representative sample of EHS programs, centers, classrooms, teachers, home visitors, and children and families (including pregnant women) and answers new questions about how EHS programs function. The study is guided by a comprehensive conceptual framework that illustrates how EHS program processes and activities are expected to lead to high quality service delivery and enhanced family and infant/toddler outcomes for the program overall. The overarching research question for Baby FACES 2018 is: How do EHS services support infant/toddler growth and development in the context of nurturing, responsive relationships? The study will address this question through the collection of rich information using interviews, self-administered questionnaires, classroom observations, and administrative data sources. This approach will allow the Administration for Children and Families to capture important information about EHS services, families, and children across all service options (e.g., center-based, home-based, or those providing both service options), as well as in depth information about how EHS classrooms and teacher-child relationships support infant/toddler development.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
children/pregnant women
children/pregnant women (2,310)
No interventions assigned to this group
parents
parents (2,310)
No interventions assigned to this group
classrooms/teachers
classrooms/teachers (840)
No interventions assigned to this group
home visitors
home visitors (630)
No interventions assigned to this group
center directors
center directors (493)
No interventions assigned to this group
program directors
program directors (140)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* In one of the 50 states or the District of Columbia
* Providing services directly to pregnant women or children up to preschool age.
* Not be in imminent danger of losing its grantee status.
Exclusion Criteria
4 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation
FED
Department of Health and Human Services
FED
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cheri Vogel, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mathematica Policy Research
Sally Atkins-Burnett, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mathematica Policy Research
Yange Xue, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mathematica Policy Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mathematica Policy Research
Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
50193
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.