Study to Understand Risk and Resilience Opportunity for Newborns After Delivery
NCT ID: NCT04438161
Last Updated: 2025-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-26
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The parent longitudinal cohort study involves enrollment of a diverse population of families of newborns (prenatally or in the immediate postnatal period) for the purpose of ascertaining sociodemographic, psychological (eg. parental stress) and family psychiatric risk factors for (a) child maltreatment (b) unmet service needs, and (c) adverse behavioral outcomes of the children. Families are contacted quarterly to track acquisition of support services that are relevant to the prevention of child maltreatment. At age 18 months early childhood behavioral outcomes are ascertained, biomaterials collected, and official-report child maltreatment records from the State of Missouri are individually cross-matched with identifiers of the children and their parents.
Two major outcomes are examined:
The first is whether the engagement protocol results in a higher level of acquisition and active participation in recommended preventive intervention services by the families (including home visitation, parental mental health care, evidence-based parenting education, and others delineated in Table 1, see below).
The second is the rate of child maltreatment (CM) ascertained in official Missouri state administrative records for which individual informed consent to individually-cross reference is obtained by the families in the course of their enrollment in the parent longitudinal study.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: A schematic summarizing study enrollment, participant randomization, and ascertainment of outcomes is provided in Figure 1.
Study Approach and Design: N=400 families are in the process of being enrolled in the parent longitudinal study. Among those who fall in an elevated risk category (upper 50% of the sample for total count of established risk factors) we will randomize 150 families 2:1 to Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports (PERCCS) versus Usual Care. Risk counts are calculated by the total number of established predictors of risk for CM (itemized in Table 1) ascertained from birth records and: i) a screen for maternal depression, ii) a screen for maternal childhood trauma, and iii) a screen for active intimate partner violence. Utilization of community-based evidence-informed support services will be ascertained at baseline and quarterly thereafter for all study participants. Official-report Child Maltreatment data from Missouri state administrative data will be individually linked with participant research records when the children reach 18 months of age.
PERCCS involves i) a review with the mother of all family CM risks ascertained in the context of their own individual screening ii) recommendations of community and clinical interventions which substantively respond to those risks and are available to the subject (on the basis of each individual subject's zip code, insurance, and eligibility for the interventions), collectively the personalized family resource plan, iii) facilitation of contact between the subject and the respective provider agencies to initiate enrollment; and iv) authorization for the research team to share the personalized risk profile and support recommendations with the infant's outpatient primary care provider.
The community and clinical supports responsive to specific risk factors are listed in Table 1, which summarizes the array of evidence-informed preventions that will be presented to the families, and the correspondence with each to specific CM risks ascertained within a family. Table 2 depicts the set of scripts which are used by the study team to standardize all aspects of the review of endorsed risks, their potential adverse effects on parenting, and the opportunities for mitigation through evidence-informed intervention.
All participants will receive care as usual, including the provision of a summary document itemizing key community supports for families of infants, a continuously-updated local community resource handbook, a published parenting guide, and opportunity to enroll free-of-charge in a virtual parenting education and developmental surveillance program, babynavigator.com.
Key Measures:
The Utilization of Community Services (UCS) is a survey that will be used to ascertain engagement of families in community supports and interventions, including tracking of both frequency and duration. This survey is completed at the time of study enrollment to establish a baseline, and quarterly thereafter until the completion of the study when a child reaches 18 months of age.
State Records: The second primary outcome, rate of child maltreatment, will rely on official state records from the State of Missouri Department of Social Services. Participants are aware that accessing service records or CM report data are retrospective when acquired and do not pose any risk or liability to them nor can it impact services received.
Statistical Analyses:
I. Intent-to-treat analysis of impact of PERCCS on service utilization. We will calculate the total proportion of evidence-informed services indicated by risk profiles of all families within each group (the intervention group and the control group) and compare the groups using chi square analysis.
II. Intent-to-treat analysis of the impact of PERCCS on the occurrence of child maltreatment. We will compare the rate of official-report abuse/neglect between the groups using chi square analysis.
III. (Secondary) We will conduct logistic regression analysis simultaneously examining the effects of risk count and service access on official report child maltreatment outcome.
The randomized controlled trial has adequate statistical power to detect an odds ratio of 2.0 for the effect of PERRCS in reducing child maltreatment outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low Risk
Low risk natural history study (n=250\*)
\*Participants will be randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization will be within successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" counts (n=105) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (n=45) families.
PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports
A brief follow-up to the screening provided to 50% of the consented families (randomly assigned) that links their specific familial risks to community interventions.
High Risk
High risk families in prospective longitudinal study of newborns (n=150\*).
\*Participants will be randomized 2:1 PERCCS:Control, and the randomization will be within successive sets of three families who fall in either "high risk" counts (n=105) families for child maltreatment or "low risk" counts (n=45) families.
Participants in this arm will be randomized to:
1. PERCCS (see attached figure and table for details)
2. Care as Usual
PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports
A brief follow-up to the screening provided to 50% of the consented families (randomly assigned) that links their specific familial risks to community interventions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PERCCS: Personalized Education Regarding Clinical and Community Supports
A brief follow-up to the screening provided to 50% of the consented families (randomly assigned) that links their specific familial risks to community interventions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years of age or older
* Engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services
Exclusion Criteria
* Under the age of 18 years
* Not engaged in the BJC Healthcare Obstetrics or Newborn Services.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mini Tandon
Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mini Tandon, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Constantino JN. Child Maltreatment Prevention and the Scope of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Apr;25(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Jaffee SR. Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology in Childhood and Adulthood. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:525-551. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045005. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
US DHHS, Children's Bureau (2017). Child Maltreatment 2015. Washington, DC: Author.U.S.
Wu SS, Ma CX, Carter RL, Ariet M, Feaver EA, Resnick MB, Roth J. Risk factors for infant maltreatment: a population-based study. Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Dec;28(12):1253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.005.
Putnam-Hornstein, E., & Needell, B. (2011). Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California's 2002 birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1337-1344.
Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):68-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
Paulsell, D., Avellar, S., Sama Martin, E., & Del Grosso, P. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Washington, DC.
Jonson-Reid M, Kohl PL, Drake B. Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):839-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2529. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
Tandon M, Jonson-Reid M, Constantino JN. Documenting Opportunity for Systematic Identification and Mitigation of Risk for Child Maltreatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;61(11):1313-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202007199
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id