Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-21
2023-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The EFFORT Trial and EFFORT Outcomes Sub-study (EFFORT-Outcomes)
NCT04931940
Optimal Protein Supplementation and Early Exercise In Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT05603585
Effect of Combined IV Bolus Amino Acid Supplementation and Mobilisation on Skeletal Muscle During the First 10 Days in the ICU: A RCT
NCT04099108
Gastrointestinal Tolerance of a Nutritional Supplement in Adult Patients With or at Risk of Malnutrition
NCT04259437
Safety and Efficacy of an Amino Acid Blend on Muscle and Gut Functionality in ICU Patients
NCT02968836
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The currently recruiting randomised controlled trial (RCT) "Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292237) is the first multi-centre trial to provide an individualised nutrition intervention for the duration of hospital admission in critically ill patients. Combining the most promising and novel bedside techniques for objectively measuring muscle health (bioimpedance technology and ultrasound) with a whole hospital nutrition intervention has never been done before, and will provide crucial data to understand the relationship between nutrition delivery and changes in muscularity from ICU admission to hospital discharge.
Aim: To explore changes in muscle health in response to an individualised nutrition intervention and in association with clinical and functional outcomes, using clinically applicable bedside techniques.
Secondary aims:
In both arms of INTENT to:
1. Compare longitudinal changes in bioimpedance variables (fat-free mass, normally hydrated lean tissue, extracellular/intracellular ratio, and variables from Cole modelling) to hospital discharge (or day 28)
2. Compare longitudinal changes in ultrasound variables (mid-upper arm and quadriceps muscle thickness, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, and rectus femoris echogenicity) to hospital discharge (or day 28)
3. Compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients identified as having low muscularity (assessed by ultrasound) at ICU admission
4. Investigate the relationship between bioimpedance and ultrasound variables with clinical and functional outcomes at baseline and over the hospital admission (collected as part of INTENT)
Hypothesis: In critically ill patients receiving individualised nutrition care for the duration of hospital admission (censored at study day 28), declines in phase angle and muscle health will be attenuated compared to patients receiving standard nutritional care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Nutrition Arm
In INTENT (the parent study) participants will be randomised to the i) Standard Nutrition or ii) Intensive Nutrition arm. A brief description of each is below.
In ICU:
1. After enrolment, patients allocated to the standard nutrition therapy (control) group will commence or continue nutrition via an enteral tube to a target rate according to unit protocol including the use of promotility agents and the placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes if required.
2. Parenteral Nutrition (PN) will only be used if the above methods have been attempted, or an absolute contraindication to enteral nutrition (EN) develops.
After ICU:
1\. Nutrition management will be as per usual site management at that hospital.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intensive Nutrition Arm
In ICU:
1. Supplemental PN will be commenced within 2 hours of randomisation. The starting dose will be determined by the amount of energy received in the 24 hours prior to randomisation
2. The need for the intervention will be based on the adequacy of nutrition provision and assessed daily until ICU discharge
3. If there is an interruption of EN for greater than 2 hours the PN must be run at 20 kcal/kg calculated body weight until EN is recommenced. After the interruption, EN should be recommenced as per local protocol.
After ICU:
1\. An intensive nutrition intervention will be provided on the ward.
The goal of nutrition care across the hospital stay will be to ensure 80-100% of participant's estimated energy requirements are met.
Supplemental parenteral nutrition
Supplemental parenteral nutrition OLIMEL N12E (Baxter Healthcare Corporation)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supplemental parenteral nutrition
Supplemental parenteral nutrition OLIMEL N12E (Baxter Healthcare Corporation)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* A pacemaker or electronic implantable device
* Missing limb(s)
* Unable to get adequate separation in the limbs (e.g. severe obesity)
* Inaccessible site(s) for electrode placement (e.g. major burns, trauma)
* Broken skin at the site(s) of electrode placement
* The treating clinician does not believe the study to be in the best interest of the patient
* Person responsible/Medical treatment decision maker is of non-English speaking background (therefore cannot provide informed consent) Note Before: If the Person responsible/medical treatment decision maker is of English speaking background but the patient is not (and the Person responsible/Medical treatment decision maker speaks the same language as the patient) you may continue assessing the patient for eligibility to INTENT-Muscle as the Person Responsible/Medical treatment decision maker can translate the Patient Information and Consent Form (PICF) and consent discussion with the patient in order to obtain continuing consent)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emma J Ridley, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Nepean Hospital
Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
Ballarat Base Hospital
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Auckland Hospital (CVICU)
Auckland, , New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANZIC-RC/ER003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.