Risk and Protective Factors in Multimodal Pain Therapy in Patients With Chronic Lumbal Pain

NCT ID: NCT04881188

Last Updated: 2022-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Results will show important information about potential protective factors which might be relevant for the recovery of patients suffering from low back pain (theoretical basis). On a clinically applied basis we plan the validation of a short screening in concerns of psychosocial risk and protective factors in patients with chronic low back pain undergoing a multimodal pain therapy (MPT), and this for the first time.

Three main aims are: 1. Prospective validation of a short screening on a theoretical basis for the collection of psychosocial risk factors concerning of an unfavourable therapeutic process in MPT. 2. the verification of differences in subgroups with regard to pain management on a basis of the Avoidance Endurance Model in the development of pain and pain-related disability. 3. The evaluation of potential psychosocial protective factors supporting a positive outcome of MPT, such as resilience, acceptance, self-compassion, and body image.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common causes of disease-related disabilities with regard to work ability, physical activity, and mobility, as well as in the development of depressive disorders and cognitive impairments. The multimodal pain therapy (MPT) is a multidisciplinary offer of medical, psychlogical and physiotherapeutic treatment. Currently, MPT is the best therapeutic option. However, there are still many non-responders. It is unknown, which patients will benefit from MPT and which contents are the most effective. Besides somatic factors, the relevance of psychosocial risk factors, such as dysfunctional pain management or disstress and depression, are evident in patients suffering from CLBP. Concepts, such as the Avoidance-Endurance Model of pain (AEM) describe different pattern with regard of mood and pain management, offering an individual therapy. Patients with a fear-avoidance response pattern (FAR) and physical inactivity as well as patients with a depressive endurance response pattern (DER) and physical overactiviity show a poorer response to therapeutical and rehabilitative treatments. On the other side, patients with an adaptive response pattern (AR) and moderate physical activity, and patients with an eustress endurance response pattern (EER) react positive to MPT. If the relevance of these pattern will be shown in patients with CLBP, this would stand for a more individualised therapy concerning psychological and physiotherapeutical treatment (e.g., ExposureTherapy, Pacing). Currently it is unknown which factors are relevant for recovery in patients with AR. One possible protective factor is the personality factor "resilience". The current research situation in the field of chronic pain and resilience is still in its early days and raises the question, if partial aspects such as a high degree of pain acceptance, of self-compassion, and a positive body image show more directly and more clearly relations to a positive response to treatment. Furthermore, research has focused on cross-sectional studies. However, only prospective longitudinal studies will provide insight in cause-and-effect-relationship. On a clinically applied basis the diagnosis of risk and protective factors will play an outstanding role to establish a more individualised therapy and rehabilitation, as also the MPT.

For the diagnosis of the different pain pattern postulated by the AEM, the 9-item Avoidance Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS) is a reliable and valid short screening. However, it has been investigated in patients with acute pain, so far. A separate validation for patients with CLPB is necessary. Our working group wants to tie up the planned prospective study to preliminary work and show for the first time processes of patients with CLBP undergoing MPT.

On a theoretical basis results will be informative about possible protective factors being important for recovery. On a clinically applied basis we plan the validation of a short-screening of psychosocial risk- and protective factors in patients with CLBP undergoing MPT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low-back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with chronic low back pain

Patients suffering from chronic low back pain (duration longer than 3 months) undergoing a multimodal pain therapy

Survey

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients with chronic low back pain in in-patient multimodal pain therapy. Three survey times, questionnaires

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey

Patients with chronic low back pain in in-patient multimodal pain therapy. Three survey times, questionnaires

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronic low back pain

Exclusion Criteria

* acute inflammatory diseases
* acute fractures
* pregnancy
* neurological dieases
* psychiatric diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Katholisches Klinikum Bochum

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ruhr University of Bochum

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Claudia Levenig

Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tobias L Schulte, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Katholisches Klinikum Bochum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Katholisches Klinikum, Klinik Blankenstein

Hattingen, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Claudia G Levenig, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+49 234 3224994

Tobias L Schulte, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

+49 234 509 2511

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Claudia Levenig

Role: primary

+49 234 32 24994

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MST2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.