Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Serum and Synovial Markers

NCT ID: NCT04858217

Last Updated: 2025-09-22

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 270 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-02-01
• Study Completion Date: 2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Total joint replacement (TJR) is an increasing effective procedure in orthopedics. However, TJR failure due to aseptic or septic loosening remains an important problem, often due to predisposing factors of the patient, which determine the need to perform a revision surgery. In light of the recent conclusions emerged on the still open problems concerning the diagnostic accuracy of serum and synovial fluid markers in the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the project aims at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the combination of serum and/or synovial markers in the diagnosis of PJI. Through a diagnostic clinical study on patients hospitalized for revision surgery the project would provide evidences on the potentiality of the combination of some markers in accelerating the PJI diagnosis for the best selection of surgical strategy, choosing the suitable cutoff thresholds to mitigate the effect of some factors on markers' discriminatory capability.

Detailed Description

Total joint arthroplasties (TJA) are constantly increasing in older and multi-morbid patients; knee and hip joints are the most frequently treated due to high incidence of osteoarthritis in these joints. The indication to TJA is now extended to younger and active patients with high functional demands and longer life expectancy. Because of these, an increase in revision surgeries and a PJI risk is also expected. The type of revision surgery (RS) approach and of antimicrobial treatments is based on the presence or absence of infection: one-stage revision with maintenance/replacement of prosthesis in combination with debridement and irrigation (aseptic RS); and two-stage revision with prosthesis removal, debridement and irrigation, the possible use of a temporary spacer, and the potential reimplantation after weeks or months (septic RS).

Today, PJI remains an important dangerous and devastating complication; it has been reported for hip and knee joints an incidence of 0.2-1.5%, prosthesis failure of 15-25%, revision success rate of 80-95% and annual cost per infection of $20,000-$40,000. The timely and most accurate diagnosis is essential for the correct treatment of PJI as patients undergoing revision need extensive physical, psychological and economic supports. Following the definition and standardization of diagnostic major and minor criteria for PJI by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) an improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of PJI was observed. Recently, the International Consensus Group on PJI revised MSIS criteria defining that patients should be considered to have PJI in the presence of one of the major criteria or three of five minor criteria. Finally, an evidence-based and validated criteria for hip and knee PJI definition to diagnose patients within the preoperative period was published in 2018. Patients with an aggregate score of more than or equal to 6 are considered infected, while a 2-5 score requires the inclusion of intraoperative findings (positive histology, purulence and single positive culture) for confirming or refuting the diagnosis. A 4-5 score is inconclusive, and a score of less than or equal to 3 is not infected.

During the last International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection, various questions on PJI were discussed and among them the working groups (WG) provided recommendations based on limited (4 - due to small numbers) and moderate (12 and 19) levels of evidence: WG4, on which patient-specific factors influence the thresholds for serum and synovial markers in acute and chronic PJI; WG12, on which serum tests have the best diagnostic accuracy for PJI and if the combination of any number of tests increase the diagnostic accuracy; WG19, if the profile of organisms causing surgical site infection or PJI following orthopaedic procedures changed over recent years. The WG4 highlighted that no inflammatory arthritis (IA)-specific factors are known to influence the thresholds for serum and synovial markers in PJIs. It appears that in IA patients there are overlaps in values of synovial markers such as alphadefensin, white blood cell count (sWBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), limiting their usefulness in differentiating septic from aseptic patients. The WG12 stated that it is evident that diagnosis of PJI cannot be based solely on serological tests and that CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are well-researched screening tests and have high sensitivity when used alone. However, the combination of serological tests has shown to improve diagnostic accuracy, but the identification of the optimal combination needs further investigations. Finally, the WG19 recommended to perform further investigations regarding the profile of microorganism with next generation sequencing (NGS), as it may confer significant antibiotic selection implications.

Among pre-operative test on synovial fluid, alpha-defensin showed the highest degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of PJI when measured by laboratory-based immunoassay rather than lateral flow test, suggesting that care must be taken with interpretation of the lateral flow test when relying on its results for the intra-operative diagnosis. Synovial fluid could be tested for other newly markers such calprotectin and cathelicidin LL-37, whose sensitivity and specifity are to be defined or for microbiological tests.

Synovial fluid analysis for WBC and %PMN has high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing PJI, and it represents an easy and widespread available method. Our meta-analysis evaluated: 1) accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid WBC and %PMN tests in the diagnosis of PJI after total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty; 2) which test yielded superior test performance; and 3) the influence of study characteristics such as anatomic site and threshold value on the diagnostic accuracy of these tests. The meta-analysis results revealed that both synovial fluid WBC and %PMN have a high specificity and sensitivity in detecting PJI, and no clear superiority of one test over the other exists. In addition, an anatomic site effect was demonstrated on sensitivity of synovial fluid %PMN, suggesting that cutoff thresholds should be identified separately for TKA and THA. The differences in bearing surfaces and the possibility of fretting corrosion in dual taper stem designs might substantially alter automated synovial fluid analysis in THA compared to TKA.

The aim of the project is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the combination of serum and/or synovial markers in the pre- or intraoperative (lateral flow test)/post- diagnosis of PJI. To such purpose a clinical diagnostic study on patients hospitalized for revision surgery based on the guidelines of MSIS will be carried out; the combinations of two or more markers with the highest diagnostic accuracies will be identified and evaluated in term of cost-effectiveness towards individual markers whose thresholds are based on the MSIS 2013 ICM. The significance of this research is to provide evidences on the potentiality of the combination of some markers in accelerating the PJI diagnosis for the best selection of surgical strategy to be followed. A prompt diagnosis and recognition of the etiological agent are crucial to define the appropriate antimicrobial therapy and to reduce to a minimum the cases of erroneous diagnosis and of consequent erroneous surgical conduct, with the need for subsequent re-operations, and multiplication of risk for patients and of costs for the health care system.

Conditions

Prosthetic Joint Infection

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_ONLY
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients requiring hip or knee replacement surgery: i) for 'late' joint prosthesis infection, present for at least 90 days from the date of the arthroplasty (first surgical phase); II) for non-infectious causes (mobilization, wear, instability, misalignment, adverse reactions to local tissues or other aseptic causes), also present for at least 90 days, and which have not had other re-operations on the same joint, and which will be a one-step review;
• Previous clinical data and laboratory and radiological examinations available.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients affected by 'early' joint prosthesis infection, with clinical symptom latency of less than 90 days (in this specific subset of patients there is in fact still considerable heterogeneity and little consensus about the diagnostic levels of white blood cell count and percentage of neutrophils).
• Patients suffering from joint prosthesis infection involving joints other than the hip or knee.
• Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders;
• Pregnant women.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Gianluca Giavaresi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Locations

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Italy

Central Contacts

Gianluca Giavaresi, MD

Role: CONTACT

gianluca.giavaresi@ior.it

+39 3774548728

Milena Fini, MD

Role: CONTACT

milena.fini@ior.it

+39 0516366786

Facility Contacts

Gianluca Giavaresi, MD

Role: primary

gianluca.giavaresi@ior.it

+393774548728

References

Pabinger C, Geissler A. Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Jun;22(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24780823 (View on PubMed)

Pabinger C, Lothaller H, Geissler A. Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Oct;23(10):1664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26028142 (View on PubMed)

Brochin RL, Phan K, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Galatz LM, Moucha CS. Trends in Periprosthetic Hip Infection and Associated Costs: A Population-Based Study Assessing the Impact of Hospital Factors Using National Data. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S233-S238. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.062. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29573912 (View on PubMed)

Schwarz EM, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Aiyer A, Battenberg A, Brown SA, Callaghan JJ, Citak M, Egol K, Garrigues GE, Ghert M, Goswami K, Green A, Hammound S, Kates SL, McLaren AC, Mont MA, Namdari S, Obremskey WT, O'Toole R, Raikin S, Restrepo C, Ricciardi B, Saeed K, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Shohat N, Tan T, Thirukumaran CP, Winters B. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions. J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30977537 (View on PubMed)

Bonanzinga T, Ferrari MC, Tanzi G, Vandenbulcke F, Zahar A, Marcacci M. The role of alpha defensin in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis: a literature review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jan 23;4(1):10-13. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180029. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30800475 (View on PubMed)

Kunutsor SK, Beswick AD, Peters TJ, Gooberman-Hill R, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Moore AJ. Health Care Needs and Support for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Prosthetic Joint Infection following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169068. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28046049 (View on PubMed)

Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis966.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23230301 (View on PubMed)

Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):2992-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21938532 (View on PubMed)

Cats-Baril W, Gehrke T, Huff K, Kendoff D, Maltenfort M, Parvizi J. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: description of the consensus process. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):4065-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3329-4. Epub 2013 Oct 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24155178 (View on PubMed)

Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29551303 (View on PubMed)

Han X, Xie K, Jiang X, Wang L, Wu H, Qu X, Yan M. Synovial fluid alpha-defensin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the lateral flow test is an effective intraoperative detection method. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 28;14(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1320-9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31455372 (View on PubMed)

Marson BA, Deshmukh SR, Grindlay DJC, Scammell BE. Alpha-defensin and the Synovasure lateral flow device for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):703-711. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1563.R1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29855233 (View on PubMed)

Suen K, Keeka M, Ailabouni R, Tran P. Synovasure 'quick test' is not as accurate as the laboratory-based alpha-defensin immunoassay: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):66-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29305453 (View on PubMed)

Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Ploegmakers JJW, Ottink K, Kampinga GA, Wagenmakers-Huizenga L, Jutte PC, Kobold ACM. Synovial Calprotectin: An Inexpensive Biomarker to Exclude a Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1149-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29224989 (View on PubMed)

Alvand A, Rezapoor M, Parvizi J. The Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Related Infections in Orthopaedics and Trauma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;971:69-79. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_11.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28243953 (View on PubMed)

Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1450-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24151261 (View on PubMed)

De Fine M, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Illuminati A, Terrando S, Pignatti G. The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018 May;42(5):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3865-3. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29523955 (View on PubMed)

Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24582925 (View on PubMed)

Moreno et al., Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Treatments. Chapman and Hall/CRC 2019. ISBN 9781138731738

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

37/2021/Sper/IOR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id