Identification of Infections in Hip Arthroplasty Loosening.

NCT ID: NCT04773054

Last Updated: 2024-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-08

Study Completion Date

2024-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recent data showed that the rate of periprosthetic infections in patients undergoing a hip arthroplasty revision for aseptic loosening is higher than what can be ascertained with conventional methods.

The study aims to assess the adequacy of next-generation sequencing of 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene amplicons for identifying occult infections and improving the diagnostic workup. Moreover, additional testing has been planned in order to increase knowledge on the etiopathogenesis of infection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty is one of the main causes of implant failure that leads to multiple surgical interventions, prolonged hospitalization, and higher complication rate and mortality.

Recent data prove that the rate of periprosthetic infections is higher than what can be ascertained with conventional techniques and highlight as analytical methods that allow an early and accurate diagnosis may help clinicians identify effective treatment and mitigate the devastating consequences.

New technologies based on culture-independent assays, i.e., the next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 16s rRNA gene amplicons, have entered medical microbiology as an alternative to traditional bacterial identification methods. NGS has been proven to detect microorganisms in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection and seems to be a valid adjunct in identifying causative pathogens in samples from patients undergoing a hip arthroplasty revision for aseptic loosening.

The microbiota profiling using NGS may also help identify patients prone to develop infections. In predisposing clinical conditions, i.e., obesity and diabetes, the metabolic and nutritional alterations modify the composition and the immunomodulatory properties of intestinal microbiota. Saprophytic, non-pathogenic microorganisms usually found in the intestine and oral cavity can be transferred to other areas becoming a potential source of periprosthetic infection.

Additionally, microorganisms may live in the periprosthetic microenvironment without giving signs of overt infection. However, bacterial products, i.e., "microbe-associated molecular patterns" (MAMPs) or "pathogen-associated molecular patterns "(PAMPs), adhere to the implant surface or the wear particles and may elicit a local inflammatory response characterized by the presence of cells capable of producing cytokines that promote osteoclastogenesis, periprosthetic resorption and consequent loosening of the implant.

In summary, the current knowledge suggests that the hip arthroplasty loosening, classified as aseptic according to the preoperative clinical and laboratory investigations, could be directly or indirectly associated with infectious pathogenesis even if the microbial cultures on periprosthetic tissues are negative.

The investigators designed a small-scale study to assess the adequacy of NGS for identifying occult infections and improving the diagnostic workup in patients undergoing a hip arthroplasty revision for aseptic loosening. Moreover, additional testing has been planned to enhance knowledge on the role of unusual or difficult-to-cultivate microorganisms in the etiopathogenesis of implant failure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Loosening, Prosthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Microbiological analysis of periprosthetic tissue

Microbiological culture of tissue samples collected intraoperatively from the newly-formed joint capsule, between prosthesis stem and femoral bone, and between the acetabular prosthesis and iliac bone.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue

Histological assessment of cellular reactivity associated with the infection on tissue samples collected intraoperatively from the newly-formed joint capsule, between prosthesis stem and femoral bone, and between the acetabular prosthesis and iliac bone.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Characterization of tissue microbiota

Assessment of tissue microbiome composition using the "next-generation sequencing" of DNA extracted from samples collected intraoperatively from the newly-formed joint capsule, between prosthesis stem and femoral bone, and between the acetabular prosthesis and iliac bone.

Intervention Type OTHER

Characterization of gut microbiota

Assessment of gut microbiome composition using the "next-generation sequencing" of DNA extracted from stool samples.

Intervention Type OTHER

Characterization of oral microbiota

Assessment of oral microbiome composition using the "next-generation sequencing" of DNA extracted from a buccal swab obtained by rubbing the mucosa of cheeks, gingivae, and palate.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Hip arthroplasty revision for aseptic loosening, diagnosis determined as probable according to the following criteria:

* pain and/or functional impairment;
* radiographic signs of osteolysis following wear of the implant components, or cortical reaction, or periprosthetic bone resorption;
* negative evaluation by the infectious disease specialist.

Exclusion Criteria

* presence of a sinus tract communicating with the arthroplasty;
* bacteria isolation from aspirates or blood cultures performed preoperatively;
* serum C-reactive protein higher than 10 mg/L;
* recurrent implant dislocations;
* prosthetic fracture;
* medical history for septic arthritis, osteomyelitis;
* infections in anatomic areas other than hip;
* antibiotic therapy in the 15 days prior to surgery (with the exception of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis);
* chronic treatment with immunosuppressive drugs;
* medical contraindications for executing sample collection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicola Baldini

Professor, Director of the Research Innovation & Technology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicola Baldini

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Bologna, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goswami K, Parvizi J. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: is there a diagnostic role for next-generation sequencing? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 Mar;20(3):269-272. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1707080. Epub 2019 Dec 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31858850 (View on PubMed)

Tarabichi M, Shohat N, Goswami K, Alvand A, Silibovsky R, Belden K, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 17;100(2):147-154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00434.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29342065 (View on PubMed)

Pajarinen J, Jamsen E, Konttinen YT, Goodman SB. Innate immune reactions in septic and aseptic osteolysis around hip implants. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014;24(4):283-96. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2014010564.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25747031 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAS-ASEPTIC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.