Optimal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Peripheral Vision

NCT ID: NCT04846140

Last Updated: 2024-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Glaucoma is a complex disease that can result in progressive vision loss. There are no treatments that restore vision lost to glaucoma. However, recent studies have shown that vision can be improved by non-invasive brain (NIBS) stimulation and visual training. In this study, we aim to compare and find out the optimal non-invasive brain stimulation model (transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)) for improving peripheral vision in glaucoma patients. The proposed treatment is the application of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) onto the participant's head, with brain stimulation aimed at the Primary Visual Cortex toward the occipital pole. The investigators hypothesize that the tES will enable higher performance in the reading task and secondary measures due to an increase in the cortical excitability of the stimulated brain cells, and tRNS will generate the greatest acute improvement in peripheral vision than either a-tDCS, tACS, or sham stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study uses a within-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and will be carried out in Hong Kong (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University).

Participants who will be recruited are 40 glaucoma patients aged 18 to 80, diagnosed with primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma with relative scotoma in both eyes. All participants will take part in 4 stimulation sessions (completion of active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham stimulation in random order) with at least 48-hour separation between visits to wash out active stimulation effects.

The primary outcome is high-resolution perimetry that will be used to measure the visual field of participants. The secondary outcome is multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) that will be used to measure the electrophysiological changes in the visual cortex.

The study consists of 5 visits:

Visit 1: Eligibility assessment (refer to the inclusion and exclusion criteria).

Visits 2 - 5: Stimulation sessions (completion of active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham stimulation in random order) with at least 48-hours separation between visits to wash out active stimulation effects. An established protocol will be used. Briefly, active a-tDCS (2 mA), tACS (2 mA), tRNS (2 mA) or sham a-tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes. The anodal electrode will be placed at Oz (visual cortex) while the cathodal electrode will be placed on the left cheek to facilitate stimulation of cells corresponding to the para-central retina that are located within the calcarine sulcus. Active stimulation will involve the delivery of 2 mA current continuously, while the fade-in-short-stimulation-fade-out approach will be used for the sham condition, in which the stimulation will be ramped down after 30 seconds of stimulation. Both the participant and experimenter will be masked to the stimulation type.

The average detection accuracy, response time, and functional connectivity will be analyzed using a within-subjects ANOVA with factors of Stimulation type (a-tDCS vs. tACS vs. tRNS vs. sham) and Time (pre and post-stimulation). Significant interactions will be investigated using post-hoc Bonferroni-adjusted paired sample t-tests. A significant interaction between Stimulation type and Time for the primary outcome followed by a significant post-hoc comparison with a p-value \<0.05 favoring tRNS would be consistent with our hypothesis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

3 sessions of 3 types of active brain stimulation and 1 session of placebo sham stimulation. Each participant will perform four sessions in a randomly-assigned order.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tDCS group

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tDCS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.

tACS group

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tACS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.

tRNS group

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tRNS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.

sham group

This group is defined as the participants who will receive sham stimulation at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age range from 18 to 80 years;
2. Diagnosis of primary open angle or normal tension glaucoma with relative scotoma in both eyes;
3. A relative scotoma defined as a Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) threshold perimetry loss (mean deviation of ≤-6dB) within the central 30° of the visual field for at least one eye;
4. Best-corrected distance visual acuity of 6/12 or better (equivalent to 0.3 logMAR acuity or better to confirm that participant's central vision is preserved);
5. Stable vision and visual field loss for at least 3 months;
6. With a cognitive functional score of 22 or above in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Hong Kong version (HK-MoCA) (to confirm participant's intact cognitive function).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Ocular diseases other than glaucoma (e.g. age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, moderate to severe cataract) or severe hearing impairment (to ensure that participant can hear the instructions clearly during assessments and training);
2. Severe medical problems (e.g. stroke, Parkinson's disease) or self-reported neurological (e.g. brain surgery, brain tumor, peripheral neuropathy), or cognitive disorders (e.g. diagnosed dementia or cognitive impairment);
3. Self-reported vestibular or cerebellar dysfunction, history of vertigo;
4. Using any medications for any neurological conditions or psychiatric drugs (e.g. sedative, hypnotic) that might interfere with motor control;
5. Contraindications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Waterloo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hong Kong Metropolitan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allen MY Cheong

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allen Cheong, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Allen MY Cheong

Hong Kong, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Allen Cheong, PhD

Role: CONTACT

852-27666108

Ben Thompson, PhD

Role: CONTACT

852-27666108

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Allen MY Cheong, PhD

Role: primary

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R5047-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Advanced Glaucoma Progression Study
NCT01742819 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Optical Angiography in Glaucoma
NCT02548676 COMPLETED