PReclude Infection EVEnts With No Prophylaxis Transperineal Biopsy
NCT ID: NCT04843566
Last Updated: 2025-04-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
687 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-22
2024-04-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized controlled trial will be the first prospective study to evaluate in-office transperineal MRI targeted prostate biopsy.
The investigators hypothesize that a transperineal MRI-targeted biopsy approach under local anesthesia compared to the standard practice transrectal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy has a much lower risk of infection, comparable pain/discomfort and may improve detection of prostate cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PReclude Infection EVEnts With No Prophylaxis Transperineal Biopsy 2
NCT04815876
Infective Complications in TP Biopsy Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis
NCT06359964
Transperineal MRI-TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy With vs Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis
NCT04146142
Reduction of Prostate Biopsy Morbidity
NCT03913039
Prostate Biopsy, Transrectal vs. Transperineal: Efficacy and Complications
NCT04081636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, significant limitations remain with this approach, including a significantly increasing risk of post-biopsy infection. This arises because more than 97% of all prostate biopsy are performed via a transrectal approach that introduces rectal bacteria with each pass of the biopsy needle into the sterile urinary tract. The current risk of post-transrectal biopsy infection, even with antimicrobial prophylaxis, is high at approximately 7% overall with 3% (30,000 men) requiring hospitalization annually.
Transperineal biopsy is an alternate approach that eliminates the direct introduction of bacteria from the rectum to the prostate. This approach, which is performed without antimicrobial prophylaxis, instead passes the biopsy needle through the perineal skin and pelvic floor.
Transperineal biopsy has not been widely adopted for several reasons. Historically, it has been considered too painful for patients in the clinic and thus was traditionally performed under general anesthesia. The added time, inconvenience and cost has limited its national adoptance. Second, when transrectal biopsy was initially adopted over 40 years ago, antibiotic resistance of rectal flora was not a challenge.
Beyond the potential for in-office transperineal biopsy to significantly reduce or eliminate biopsy infections, transperineal biopsy may also improve cancer detection: studies of transperineal biopsy (performed under general anesthesia) demonstrate higher detection rates for prostate cancer, particularly for anterior zone tumors, compared to transrectal biopsy. This is notable, as anterior tumors are difficult to sample with transrectal. Anterior tumors are also twice as likely to occur in African American men. In fact, our research demonstrates that some of the outcomes disparities in African American men may stem from an underdiagnosis of anterior prostate cancers.
Although transrectal biopsy is used widely, it is associated with a significant and increasing risk of biopsy infections due to growing antibiotic resistance, highlighting the urgent need for a safer alternative approach to prostate biopsy. The study investigators have refined a transperineal approach under local anesthesia with MRI-targeting/guidance without the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. The investigators hypothesize that transperineal MRI targeted biopsy will: (1) largely eliminate post-biopsy infections and costly hospitalizations for urosepsis; (2) be performed in the office with similar discomfort and non-infectious complications compared to transrectal MRI targeted biopsy; and (3) have significantly better detection of prostate cancer.
This multi-center randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate in-office transperineal MRI targeted vs. transrectal MRI targeted biopsy, the current gold standard. This has transformative impact to change current standard of practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transrectal
Patients will receive a transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.
Transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
Transrectal prostate biopsy is currently the most popular approach to evaluate a positive screening test for prostate cancer.
Antibiotic (prophylaxis)
For men undergoing transrectal biopsy, antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered in accordance with guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA).
No antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered for men undergoing transperineal biopsy.
Transperineal
Patients will receive a transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.
Transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
Transperineal prostate biopsy will be performed under local anesthesia in the office. This approach avoids transrectal needle tracking.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
Transperineal prostate biopsy will be performed under local anesthesia in the office. This approach avoids transrectal needle tracking.
Transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy
Transrectal prostate biopsy is currently the most popular approach to evaluate a positive screening test for prostate cancer.
Antibiotic (prophylaxis)
For men undergoing transrectal biopsy, antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered in accordance with guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA).
No antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered for men undergoing transperineal biopsy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* Men without previous prostate biopsy (first time prostate biopsy)
* Willingness to sign informed consent and adhere to the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* PSA \> 20 ng/mL in men who have previously undergone prostate biopsy
* Current non-urologic bacterial infection requiring active treatment with antibiotics
* Unfit to undergo prostate biopsy under local anesthesia
* Prior definitive therapy for prostate cancer, such as radiation therapy or partial gland ablation
* Men who have previously undergone prostate biopsy in whom artifact would reduce quality of prostate MRI (extensive orthopedic pelvic metal)
* Contraindication to prostate MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, chronic kidney disease) in men who have previously undergone prostate biopsy
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jim C Hu, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Connecticut
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Michigan Medical School
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
NewYork Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, United States
NewYork-Presbyterian Queens
Flushing, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Driscoll C, Handa N, Huang M, Murphy A, Hu J, Schaeffer E. Evaluating PI-RADS lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in Black and Asian men: a PREVENT randomized clinical trial secondary analysis. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Jul 4:rs.3.rs-6905600. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6905600/v1.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-02-365-NIH
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20-04021956
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.