Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congenital Heart Diseases With Systemic Right Ventricle

NCT ID: NCT04842851

Last Updated: 2021-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to analyze outcomes of patients with systemic right ventricle (SRV) implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) systems and to compare the impact of CRT in SRV patients with other congenital heart diseases (CHD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart failure is henceforth the main cause of death in adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The number of affected patients is expected to continue to grow exponentially due to the important increase and aging of this population.

In symptomatic patients despite optimal pharmacological therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) offers a well-recognized therapeutic option in dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathies with severely impaired left ventricle ejection fraction and complete left bundle branch block. In patients with CHD, the level of evidence is much more limited. Underlying phenotypes are heterogeneous, including systemic right ventricles (SRVs), isolated sub-pulmonary right ventricle dysfunctions, single ventricles, and most of patients have a right bundle branch block. All these specificities question the extrapolation of data reported in patients with acquired cardiomyopathies. Despite the lack of evidence, CRT systems have been progressively used in CHD patients, also because alternative options are poor, mainly represented by cardiac transplantation, but grafts are rare and congenital patients frequently have contraindications.

A positive impact of CRT in CHD has first been suggested in small series where hemodynamic invasive parameters (e.g. dP/dt max) were improved and QRS narrowed by multisite pacing. A few subsequent studies then reported an improvement of ventricular functions and patient-reported functional subjective parameters (mainly NYHA classification). However, the number of patients included in most studies was limited and heterogeneous forms of CHD were often pooled when interpreting results. The studies evaluating CRT specifically in patients with SRV are very rare and demonstrated conflicting results. The largest study to date assessing specifically CRT in patients with SRV included 20 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (cc-TGA) and demonstrated an acute improvement in two-thirds of patients.

Although patients with SRV represent one of the main groups of CHD patients currently implanted with CRT, the paucity of specific data in this population has been highlighted as a major evidence gap and as a high-impact research question by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines committee.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congenital Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systemic right ventricle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with congenital heart disease and CRT device

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient's refusal
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Clinique Pasteur Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hopital Louis Pradel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Georges Pompidou Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (Inserm U970)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victor Waldmann, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2219047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TTVR Early Feasibility Study
NCT04433065 RECRUITING NA