Early Versus Emergency Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients Awaiting Cardiac Transplantation

NCT ID: NCT02387112

Last Updated: 2023-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to assess whether, in patients who are listed for cardiac transplantation in transplantable (T) status, early implantation of a left ventricular assist device is superior to the current therapeutic strategy of medical heart failure therapy and assist device implantation only after serious deterioration of the patient's condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart transplantation is considered the gold-standard therapy for end-stage systolic heart failure but the shortage of donor hearts in Germany and other countries has led to widespread use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Even on the transplant list, patients' condition often deteriorate due to worsening heart failure so that they need an LVAD as a bridge until transplantation. The high mortality (one in five patients on the waiting list dies within 1 year) reflects the severity of the disease. In comparison, technical progress has reduced the complication rate seen with assist devices and, according to recent data, mortality during LVAD support is low. Patient status prior to LVAD implantation is a strong indicator for postoperative outcome, i.e. patients in worse condition are more likely to develop complications. Thus, the comparison between the standard indication and early LVAD implantation (T-status) appears timely and clinically necessary.

The paucity of donor hearts necessitates the prospective evaluation of alternative treatment regimens. The aim of the study is to assess whether, in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation, a strategy involving early LVAD implantation is superior to a strategy of conservative medical heart failure therapy and assist device implantation only after severe deterioration of heart failure.

The investigators expect to gain insights that will be trail-blazing for the future treatment of patients with heart failure on the transplantation waiting list, including aspects of their medical care. If the study hypotheses are confirmed, the treatment of these seriously ill patients could be, on the one hand, further optimized. On the other hand, positive economic effects are highly probable.

The results will form the basis of future guidelines for the treatment of this group of patients.

Thus the study will also make a contribution to solving the problem of the ever increasing number of patients on the waiting list as opposed to the decreasing willingness to donate organs for transplantation.

As a mean of quality control of the conducted study and to retrieve more data in this population all patients who fulfill the eligibility criteria of the study but do not consent to randomization are included in a standard treatment registry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early VAD implantation

The experimental intervention is early implantation of a left ventricular assist device (early VAD). Patients randomized to early VAD implantation will obtain a VAD within 28 days after randomization.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early VAD implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of a left ventricular assist device

Emergency VAD implantation

The control intervention is conservative heart failure treatment, with LVAD implantation in the case of worsening heart failure (emergency VAD). All patients randomized to the control intervention will be treated according to standard medical practice. In brief, these patients are closely monitored (scheduled regular visits to outpatient department depending on the patient's condition and at least every 6 months). If the condition worsens the patient may qualify for high urgency (HU) listing and/or for VAD implantation.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early VAD implantation

Implantation of a left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient (male or female) eligible for heart transplantation and accepted in T Status (transplantable) on the waiting list
* Age 18 to 65 years
* Signed informed consent
* \>30% 1-year mortality with the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) or at least three of the following criteria (a) to (f):

1. cardiac index (CI) \<2.5 l/min/m²
2. pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \>15 mmHg
3. maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) ≤10.0 ml/kg/min or ≤12.0 ml/kg/min in patients intolerant of a ß-blocker
4. ratio of minute ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide (VCO2) production (VE/VCO2) slope of \>35
5. at least two hospitalizations for heart failure within the previous 12 months
6. documented increase of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or NTproBNP levels despite optimal medical therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Listing for transplantation of other organs in addition to heart
* Previous cardiac surgeries (other than pacemaker or ICD surgeries)
* Contraindications to assist device implantation (e.g. mechanical aortic valve, aortic insufficiency)
* Contraindications to anticoagulation
* Expected need for a right ventricular assist device/biventricular support expected (e.g. due to tricuspid valve insufficiency grade 3+, right ventricular ratio short/long axis ≥0.6, ratio of right to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD/LVEDD) \>0.72, restrictive cardiomyopathy)
* Presence of catecholamine support or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP)
* Overt infections
* Fixed pulmonary hypertension (i.e. pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) \>60 mmHg and mean transpulmonary gradient (TPG) \>15 mmHg or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) \>6 Wood units despite optimal medical treatment)
* Renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<30ml/min or need for hemodialysis or hemofiltration)
* Significant coagulopathies
* Systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoid, or amyloidosis that has multisystem involvement and is still active
* Drug abuse and/or alcohol abuse
* Incompliance
* Elevated panel reactivity levels of \>50 %
* Pregnancy or breast feeding in women
* Participation in other investigational trials
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helmholtz Zentrum München

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medicine Greifswald

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Göttingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

German Heart Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Volkmar Falk, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

German Heart Institute Berlin Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen - Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Kerckhoff Klinik Bad Nauheim

Bad Nauheim, , Germany

Site Status

Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW - Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Bad Oeynhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin: Campus Benjamin Franklin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

German Heart Center Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen - Herzchirurgische Klinik

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt - Klinik für Thorax-, Herz- und thorakale Gefäßchirurgie

Frankurt Am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Med. Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein - Campus Kiel

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Heart Center Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg Klinik für Herz- und thorakale Gefäßchirurgie

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München - Campus Großhadern

München, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätskrankenhaus Münster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VAD Study Germany

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DZHK VAD Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.