Human/Machine Interface: What the HeartMate 3 ® Device Tells Us About the Future

NCT ID: NCT06039176

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-27

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Durable left ventricular assist devices (dLVAD) have been increasingly utilized since the mid to late 1990s, with an uptick of utility starting in 2010 following expanded indications for therapy to not only include a bridge to transplantation strategy, but also for those individuals who suffer from advanced heart failure (HF) and do not qualify for cardiac transplantation. Despite the decreasing size of the newest generation devices leading to a lessened occurrence of adverse events, bleeding and infection still remain a concern for clinicians, as well as a general lack of predictability towards adverse events in individuals with a dLVAD in place. There is a lack of description in the literature currently, regarding the interface between what the pump data provides and what is seen in clinical practice. There also is little known about the effects of what is provided in the pump data, in correlation to quality-of-life following dLVAD implantation.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prospectively analyze normal and abnormal pump data through pump operations such as suction events, low flow alarms as well as other adventitious alarms, PI events and power cable disconnects greater than 20 seconds, from the HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD in order to clinically correlate this data to quality of life, frailty and other various medical conditions and adverse events as defined by the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs). This will be achieved through two aims: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of dLVAD pump operations data on clinical practice application (quality of life, frailty and various medical conditions, and adverse events such as GIB, RHF, infection, hypertension, arrhythmias and stroke); and 2) Evaluate correlations and relationships of longitudinal normal and abnormal dLVAD pump operations data, to demographic and clinical variables. This study is the first study to evaluate HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump operations data over time for effectiveness in the clinical practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims The prevalence of heart failure (HF), a chronic medical condition, continues to grow exponentially, affecting more than 26 million globally. There are more than 6.5 million in the United States alone with HF. Roughly 600,000 individuals suffer from end-stage HF, defined as advanced structural changes to the heart, significantly worsening HF symptoms despite medical therapy, and generally more than 50% 1-year mortality risk.There are limited treatment options once traditional guideline driven medical therapy fails in those advancing to end-stage HF. Limited treatment options at this point have included consideration of cardiac transplantation or implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD), or proceeding down the path of palliative care and hospice. One-year mortality risk without a dLVAD is nearing now 80%, as opposed to one-year survival with a dLVAD approaching 75-80%. Once a dLVAD is placed, concern continues of predicting adverse events. Multiple groups have utilized different strategies to predict the risk of bleeding, stroke and infection, yet not one strategy alone is all-encompassing of these three adverse events. Bleeding risk following dLVAD implantation ranges between 15-68%, while the risk of infection is estimated between 19-39%. The risk of stroke with dLVADs is as high as 10%. Prior to market removal, researchers utilizing the HeartWare ® (or HVAD) have analyzed waveform and pump data to predict or determine sequencing of adverse events. This study through machine learning, found that bleeding and right heart failure (RHF) were the most commonly found adverse events with the earliest onset, while infection and bleeding were the most common adverse events overall after three months on device. While additional pump data analyses exist for other centrifugal flow pumps, there is a significant gap in the literature where little information is known of how the HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump operations data (such as suction events, low flow alarms and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects greater than 20 seconds) interfaces with quality of life (QOL), frailty and other various medical conditions, as well as how additional pump data may predict future adverse events such as gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), RHF, infection, hypertension, arrhythmias or stroke. Clinicians caring for individuals with a HeartMate 3 ® devices are not aware at this time how pump operations data correlates to the clinical component of care, thus demonstrating the importance of this study.

To address the gap of how the HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump data interfaces with clinical care, this prospective, multi-center trial will analyze the normal and abnormal pump operations data (such as suction events, low flow alarms and other adventitious alarms, PI events or incidence of power cable disconnects) from HeartMate 3 ® dLVADs for clinical correlations to QOL, severity of frailty, various medical conditions, and adverse events at ten different centers worldwide. Currently there are no mandatory guidelines for pump operations data downloads in the instructions-for-use manual, only recommendations from each individual company. Researchers have been challenged to think outside the box of what information has yet to be divulged from normal and abnormal pump operations in order to assist clinicians in better care as the evolution of smaller and smarter to devices occur. In this study, the investigators hypothesize the following: 1.) there will be correlations between abnormal hemodynamic pump operations (e.g. suction events, low flow alarms and other adventitious alarms, "PI" events, and power cable disconnects greater than 20 seconds), and worsening quality of life; 2.) worsening severity of frailty will demonstrate increased power cable disconnects and/or increased use of the power module "A/C" power, due to handling mistakes or less mobility; 3.) early stages of gastrointestinal bleeding will be seen with abnormal hemodynamic pump operations (such as suction events) 3-7 days prior to the actual event of being symptomatic; and 4.) patients with GIB or RHF will have lower PI values in comparison to those that do not have adverse events, when having comparable set speeds. In order to meet the objectives with the purpose of this study, two aims have been established:

Aim #1: Evaluate the effectiveness of HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD normal and abnormal pump operations data on clinical practice applications when utilizing downloadable pump data analyses at several time points following implantation: discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), discharge from the hospital (minimum over a week post implant and +/- 3 days from discharge), 3-months post dLVAD, 6-months post dLVAD, and 12-months post dLVAD. Data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned Emergency Room (ER) visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event related ER visits. Clinical practice applications include: QOL, severity of frailty and other various medical conditions, and adverse events such as GIB, RHF, infection, hypertension, arrhythmias and stroke.

Aim #2: Evaluate correlations and relationships between longitudinal normal and abnormal dLVAD pump operations data, to demographic and clinical variables (e.g. age, gender, length of stay, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) score, co-morbidities, eyeball frailty test, laboratory values, EQ-5D and Visual Analog Scale, Mini-Cog ©, physical frailty measurements through 6-Minute Walk Test and Sit-to-Stand Chair rise test, anticoagulation strategies, cardiopulmonary bypass time, intubation to extubation time, temporary support prior to and following dLVAD implantation, concomitant surgeries, post-surgical complications, and echocardiography results).

Significance Individuals caring for HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD recipients oftentimes rely on industry interpretation of waveforms and pump data in urgent clinical situations. However, there may be limitations in how quick this information is provided to the clinicians to piece the puzzle together. There is limited pump operations data research directly available to the clinician to demonstrate the interface connection towards clinical practical applications, or relationships with other co-morbid conditions and adverse events as previously mentioned. With persistent adverse events in the dLVAD population, more information pertaining to the clinical situation is always helpful. There has only been data reported on the Heartware ® system with regards to real time data. For example, HeartWare ® log files and pump operations data have been analyzed to identify ingestion of pump thrombosis, while suggestions have begun to start using patient monitoring through the HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD system. To date, there is scarce literature to describe the HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump operations data within the clinical interface. More importantly, clinicians are not aware of added benefits from dLVADs unless shared from industry partners.

When a HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD patient presents with a problem or suspected adverse event, current practice and recommendations from industry is to download the log files and pump operations data, and submit directly to the Abbott ® team to further provide insight from industry of any potential problems occurring directly with the device. This download is quick and can be done by ventricular assist device (VAD) coordinators or other staff in the hospital or clinic, however the analysis results themselves can at times, take up to a few hours to learn mostly what is already being seen by the clinician performing the download. The Medical University of Vienna team has the ability to interpret routine and available downloadable pump operations data through file analyses when downloading files using the Abbott ® display screens or HeartMate Touch ® systems. This advancement from the Medical University of Vienna will provide additional analysis efforts in this study following pump operations data retrieval.

Despite attempts of medical care being guided towards prevention, health care often times resorts to reactionary care instead, by no fault of our own. If clinicians had the capability of predicting adverse events, what affects QOL and what may lessen the severity of frailty or other affects towards medical conditions based upon the downloadable pump operations data alone, the health care pendulum would swing back towards the efforts of prevention, lessening cost and improving overall QOL. There have been speculations of utilizing dLVADs as a means for patient monitoring, leading clinicians to consider recommendations of needing wireless transmission of real time dLVAD pump operations data at any point throughout the life of a dLVAD, including while at home, at routine care appointments and when things arise or symptoms occur. This would be a similar process in how an automated internal cardiac defibrillator patient sends in a manual transmission download for the clinician to further evaluate any rhythm disturbances. This is a major gap in the functional reporting of a dLVAD and can actually hinder the care provided by the clinician seeing the patient. This has led to the development of this study.

Previous reports have discussed analyzing pump data on the HeartWare ® device. This pump has now been removed from the market for implantation purposes, but this research paved the way for future needs of clinicians when it comes down to the care of a dLVAD patient. One thing learned through the recent SARS-CoV-19 pandemic is the benefit and utility of remote monitoring for ongoing patient care across the spectrum of healthcare, in order to assist in resource allocation. Clinicians caring for dLVAD patients need to further investigate predictive models and causal relationships of pump operations data to QOL, the severity of frailty, advancement of other medical conditions and adverse events such as GIB, RHF, infection, hypertension, arrhythmias and stroke. The study's primary end point is 12-month survival post-LVAD implantation stratified by percentage of abnormal pump data. Secondary end point is to evaluate correlations and relationships between normal and abnormal dLVAD pump data, to demographic and clinical variables, including longitudinal pump data analyses.

Preliminary Study Work Pilot work regarding HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump data analyses began in 2020, where retrospective data was compiled to begin understanding the effects of downloaded log files to adverse events. This pivotal start of research demonstrated there is utility in HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD log files to determine potential suction events leading to ischemic strokes. After further discussion between VAD coordinators across the globe, members of the International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians (ICCAC) society suggested to proceed with further investigation into what further log file interpretation is needed to provide assistance in clinical care.

This study does not involve any devices being attached to the driveline or other alterations to the pump or external components. This study is strictly looking at analyses of routinely available and "downloadable" log files at prospective time points. This grant moves the science forward in attempts to identify relationships between HeartMate 3 ® dLVAD pump operations data (both normal and abnormal) regarding QOL, severity of frailty, advancement of medical conditions and adverse events such as GIB, RHF, infection, hypertension, arrhythmias and stroke. Currently, standard of practice does not mandatorily dictate when pump data should be downloaded, with current recommendations being at all of the Intermacs follow-up appointments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

LVAD Frailty GI Bleed Right Heart Failure Infections Hypertension Arrhythmias Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mayo Clinic

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

University of Florida

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

University of Utah

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

University of California, San Francisco

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

University of Chicago

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

University of Kansas Medical System

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

Medical University of South Carolina

Obtain demographic and clinical data prior to and following implantation of a HeartMate 3 ® device. HeartMate 3® downloaded pump operations data will be obtained at the following scheduled intervals: discharge from the ICU, at the time of discharge from the hospital (or ± 3 days from discharge), 3-months post-implant, 6-months post-implant, and lastly at 12-months post-implant. Downloadable pump operations data will include evaluation of suction events, low flow and other adventitious alarms, PI events and incidence of power cable disconnects beyond 20 seconds. The previously mentioned data will also be collected during any unplanned office visits, any admission regardless of the reason, unplanned ER visits related to equipment problems or any serious adverse event-related ER visits.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

Intervention Type DEVICE

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device

No direct intervention; this is prospective study analysis of pump data from the HeartMate 3 (R) left ventricular assist device with clinical correlation to a multitude of variables and conditions we see clinically

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* Scheduled Heartmate 3 ® dLVAD implantation

Exclusion Criteria

* \<18 years of age
* Scheduled for dLVAD that is NOT a Heartmate 3 (R) device
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Kansas Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah E Schroeder, PhD MSN RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic-Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

MUSC

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sarah E Schroeder, PhD MSN RN

Role: CONTACT

402-937-3595

Thomas Schloglhofer, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+43 650 7119129

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sylvie Baudart

Role: primary

Sara Geiger

Role: primary

Krystina Chickerillo

Role: primary

Sarah Schettle, PA

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, Delling FN, Djousse L, Elkind MSV, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Jordan LC, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Kwan TW, Lackland DT, Lewis TT, Lichtman JH, Longenecker CT, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Martin SS, Matsushita K, Moran AE, Mussolino ME, O'Flaherty M, Pandey A, Perak AM, Rosamond WD, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Stokes A, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Turakhia MP, VanWagner LB, Wilkins JT, Wong SS, Virani SS; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30700139 (View on PubMed)

Shahim B, Kapelios CJ, Savarese G, Lund LH. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure: An Updated Review. Card Fail Rev. 2023 Jul 27;9:e11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2023.05. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37547123 (View on PubMed)

Friedrich EB, Bohm M. Management of end stage heart failure. Heart. 2007 May;93(5):626-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.098814. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17435073 (View on PubMed)

Gosev I, Kiernan MS, Eckman P, Soleimani B, Kilic A, Uriel N, Rich JD, Katz JN, Cowger J, Lima B, McGurk S, Brisco-Bacik MA, Lee S, Joseph SM, Patel CB; Evolving Mechanical Support Research Group (EMERG) Investigators. Long-Term Survival in Patients Receiving a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar;105(3):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.057. Epub 2017 Dec 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29198630 (View on PubMed)

Mancini D, Colombo PC. Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Rapidly Evolving Alternative to Transplant. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 16;65(23):2542-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.039.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26065994 (View on PubMed)

Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, Cleveland JC Jr, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C, Walsh MN, Milano CA, Patel CB, Ewald GA, Itoh A, Dean D, Krishnamoorthy A, Cotts WG, Tatooles AJ, Jorde UP, Bruckner BA, Estep JD, Jeevanandam V, Sayer G, Horstmanshof D, Long JW, Gulati S, Skipper ER, O'Connell JB, Heatley G, Sood P, Naka Y; MOMENTUM 3 Investigators. Two-Year Outcomes with a Magnetically Levitated Cardiac Pump in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1386-1395. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800866. Epub 2018 Mar 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29526139 (View on PubMed)

Milano CA, Rogers JG, Tatooles AJ, Bhat G, Slaughter MS, Birks EJ, Mokadam NA, Mahr C, Miller JS, Markham DW, Jeevanandam V, Uriel N, Aaronson KD, Vassiliades TA, Pagani FD; ENDURANCE Investigators. HVAD: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;6(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30007559 (View on PubMed)

Birks EJ. Stopping LVAD Bleeding: A Piece of the Puzzle. Circ Res. 2017 Sep 29;121(8):902-904. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311759. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28963184 (View on PubMed)

Zinoviev R, Lippincott CK, Keller SC, Gilotra NA. In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32405511 (View on PubMed)

Cornwell WK 3rd, Ambardekar AV, Tran T, Pal JD, Cava L, Lawley J, Tarumi T, Cornwell CL, Aaronson K. Stroke Incidence and Impact of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Cerebrovascular Physiology. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):542-548. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022967. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30602359 (View on PubMed)

Kilic A, Macickova J, Duan L, Movahedi F, Seese L, Zhang Y, Jacoski MV, Padman R. Machine Learning Approaches to Analyzing Adverse Events Following Durable LVAD Implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):770-777. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33221198 (View on PubMed)

Han JJ, Acker MA, Atluri P. Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Circulation. 2018 Dec 11;138(24):2841-2851. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035566.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30565993 (View on PubMed)

Moscato F, Gross C, Maw M, Schloglhofer T, Granegger M, Zimpfer D, Schima H. The left ventricular assist device as a patient monitoring system. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):221-232. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-218.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33842216 (View on PubMed)

Watson AR, Wah R, Thamman R. The Value of Remote Monitoring for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Sep;26(9):1110-1112. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0134. Epub 2020 May 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32384251 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ICCAC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id