Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Low Risk Bicuspid Study
NCT ID: NCT03635424
Last Updated: 2025-10-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-30
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in High Risk and Very High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01240902
The Medtronic TAVR 2.0 US Clinical Study
NCT02738853
TTVR Early Feasibility Study
NCT04433065
Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement
NCT06814574
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement With the Medtronic Intrepid™ Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement (TTVR) System in Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation
NCT07321899
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All subjects will be treated with a Medtronic TAVR system. Subject follow-ups will be conducted at pre and post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 10 years
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Medtronic TAVR Systems
Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems
Medtronic TAVR Systems
Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medtronic TAVR Systems
Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. For symptomatic patients:
Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), OR mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest
2. For asymptomatic patients:
Very severe aortic stenosis with an aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND maximal aortic velocity ≥5.0 m/sec, or mean gradient ≥60 mmHg by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, OR
Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND a mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND an exercise tolerance test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia OR
Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND a left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%.
2. Patient is considered low risk for SAVR, where low risk is defined as predicted risk of mortality for SAVR \<3% at 30 days per multidisciplinary local heart team assessment.
3. Bicuspid aortic valve anatomy (all sub-types) confirmed by MDCT.
4. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age less than 60 years
3. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately pre-medicated:
1. aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin
2. ticlopidine and clopidogrel
3. Nitinol (titanium or nickel)
4. contrast media
4. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC \<1000 mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states.
5. Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis.
6. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal stent or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to screening committee approval.
7. Multivessel coronary artery disease with a Syntax score \>22 and/or unprotected left main coronary artery.
8. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within 10 weeks of Heart Team assessment.
9. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
10. Recent (within 2 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
11. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation.
12. Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
13. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
14. Estimated life expectancy of less than 24 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
15. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams.
16. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries).
17. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤30 days before the study procedure due to unstable coronary artery disease (WHO criteria).
18. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
19. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
20. Subject is legally incompetent, or otherwise vulnerable
21. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
22. Severe mitral regurgitation amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
23. Severe tricuspid regurgitation amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
24. Moderate or severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
25. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow gradient.
26. Prohibitive left ventricular outflow tract calcification.
27. Sinus of Valsalva diameter unsuitable for placement of the self-expanding bioprosthesis
28. Aortic annulus diameter of \<18 or \>30 mm.
29. Significant ascending aortopathy requiring surgical repair
30. Ascending aorta diameter \> 4.5 cm
For transfemoral or transaxillary (subclavian) access:
31. Access vessel mean diameter \<5.0 mm for Evolut 23R, 26R, or 29R mm TAV, or access vessel mean diameter \<5.5 mm for Evolut 34R mm or Evolut PRO 23R, 26R, 29 R mm TAV. However, for transaxillary (subclavian) access in patients with a patent LIMA, access vessel mean diameter \<5.5mm for Evolut 23R, 26R, or 29R mm TAV, or access vessel mean diameter \<6.0 mm for the Evolut 34R or Evolut PRO TAV.
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiovascular
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Reardon, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
John Forrest, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Basel Ramlawi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Paramount Heart
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Abrazo Arizona Heart Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla
La Jolla, California, United States
Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, United States
HealthPark Medical Center
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Spectrum Health Hospital
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, United States
The Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Saint Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University Hospital
Portland, Oregon, United States
UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg Campus
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Paramount Heart
Villanova, Pennsylvania, United States
Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart & Vascular Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Forrest JK, Ramlawi B, Deeb GM, Zahr F, Song HK, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Michelena HI, Mangi AA, Skiles JA, Huang J, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):50-57. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4738.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10790330DOC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.