Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Low Risk Bicuspid Study

NCT ID: NCT03635424

Last Updated: 2025-10-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-30

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the trial is to evaluate the procedural safety and efficacy of the Medtronic TAVR system in patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multi-center, prospective, single arm

All subjects will be treated with a Medtronic TAVR system. Subject follow-ups will be conducted at pre and post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 10 years

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medtronic TAVR Systems

Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medtronic TAVR Systems

Intervention Type DEVICE

Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medtronic TAVR Systems

Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Severe aortic stenosis, defined as follows:

1. For symptomatic patients:

Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), OR mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest
2. For asymptomatic patients:

Very severe aortic stenosis with an aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND maximal aortic velocity ≥5.0 m/sec, or mean gradient ≥60 mmHg by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, OR

Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND a mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND an exercise tolerance test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia OR

Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND a left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%.
2. Patient is considered low risk for SAVR, where low risk is defined as predicted risk of mortality for SAVR \<3% at 30 days per multidisciplinary local heart team assessment.
3. Bicuspid aortic valve anatomy (all sub-types) confirmed by MDCT.
4. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any condition considered a contraindication for placement of a bioprosthetic valve (eg, subject is indicated for mechanical prosthetic valve).
2. Age less than 60 years
3. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately pre-medicated:

1. aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin
2. ticlopidine and clopidogrel
3. Nitinol (titanium or nickel)
4. contrast media
4. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC \<1000 mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states.
5. Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis.
6. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal stent or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to screening committee approval.
7. Multivessel coronary artery disease with a Syntax score \>22 and/or unprotected left main coronary artery.
8. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within 10 weeks of Heart Team assessment.
9. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
10. Recent (within 2 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
11. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation.
12. Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
13. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
14. Estimated life expectancy of less than 24 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
15. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams.
16. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries).
17. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤30 days before the study procedure due to unstable coronary artery disease (WHO criteria).
18. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
19. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
20. Subject is legally incompetent, or otherwise vulnerable

21. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
22. Severe mitral regurgitation amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
23. Severe tricuspid regurgitation amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
24. Moderate or severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
25. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow gradient.
26. Prohibitive left ventricular outflow tract calcification.
27. Sinus of Valsalva diameter unsuitable for placement of the self-expanding bioprosthesis
28. Aortic annulus diameter of \<18 or \>30 mm.
29. Significant ascending aortopathy requiring surgical repair
30. Ascending aorta diameter \> 4.5 cm

For transfemoral or transaxillary (subclavian) access:
31. Access vessel mean diameter \<5.0 mm for Evolut 23R, 26R, or 29R mm TAV, or access vessel mean diameter \<5.5 mm for Evolut 34R mm or Evolut PRO 23R, 26R, 29 R mm TAV. However, for transaxillary (subclavian) access in patients with a patent LIMA, access vessel mean diameter \<5.5mm for Evolut 23R, 26R, or 29R mm TAV, or access vessel mean diameter \<6.0 mm for the Evolut 34R or Evolut PRO TAV.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiovascular

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Reardon, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

John Forrest, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Basel Ramlawi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Paramount Heart

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Abrazo Arizona Heart Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

HealthPark Medical Center

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee Memorial Hospital

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Atlanta Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Health System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health Hospital

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

North Shore University Hospital

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

The Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Saint Francis Hospital

Roslyn, New York, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University Hospital

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg Campus

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Paramount Heart

Villanova, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart & Vascular Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Forrest JK, Ramlawi B, Deeb GM, Zahr F, Song HK, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Michelena HI, Mangi AA, Skiles JA, Huang J, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):50-57. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4738.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33031491 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10790330DOC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Randomized Evaluation for Failed TAVR
NCT06400342 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
The TRICURE EFS Study
NCT06506942 RECRUITING NA