TranScatheter Aortic Valve RepLacement System US Feasibility Trial

NCT ID: NCT01932099

Last Updated: 2016-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Direct Flow Medical aortic valve system. This is for people with severe aortic stenosis who are not well enough to undergo a surgical repair. The delivery of this device is done via the femoral artery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is indicated for symptomatic patients who require replacement of their native aortic valve and have a predicted operative mortality or serious morbidity risk of equal or greater 50% at 30 days with surgical aortic valve replacement or are deemed unsuitable for surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pathological constriction; restricted outflow, stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single arm feasibility study

Prospective, multi-center, single arm feasibility study. Subjects will include patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who require replacement of their native aortic valve. The intervention is transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is indicated for use in aortic stenosis for patients at extreme surgical risk for aortic valve replacement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is indicated for use in aortic stenosis for patients at extreme surgical risk for aortic valve replacement.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Direct Flow Medical aortic valve system TAVR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient has severe senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis determined by resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram and Doppler, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization defined as: mean gradient \>40 mmHg or peak jet velocity \>4.0 m/s and an aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤0.5 cm2/m2.
2. The patient has moderate to severe symptoms from aortic valve stenosis (NYHA Functional Class ≥III).
3. The patient must have a predicted risk of operative mortality or serious irreversible morbidity of \>50% at 30 days, or be deemed not suitable for surgery for other reasons. This conclusion shall be based on consensus of one cardiologist and two cardiac surgeons at the investigational site after careful consideration of the patient's STS risk score and co-morbidities, and after at least one of the surgeons participating in the decision has personally examined the patient.
4. The patient been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, is willing to comply with protocol-specified follow-up evaluations and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate IRB.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<20% determined by resting echocardiogram
2. Patients with an acute MI within 30 days preceding the index procedure.
3. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the study procedure
4. Patients with impaired renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \[eGFR\] \<20cc/min, calculated from serum creatinine by the Cockcroft-Gault formula)
5. Patients with a platelet count of \<50,000 cells/mm³ or a WBC \< 1000 cells/mm³ within 7 days prior to index procedure.
6. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, or who will refuse transfusion.
7. Patients who have received any organ transplant or are on a waiting list for any organ transplant.
8. Patients with known other medical illness (e.g. carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease) or known history of substance abuse that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a life expectancy of less than one year, or expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of aortic stenosis.
9. Patients with known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
10. Patients with a history of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the prior 6 months.
11. Patients with an active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the prior 6 months.
12. Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock defined by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
13. Patients who have a planned treatment with any other investigational device or procedure during the study period, or who are currently participating in an investigational drug or another device trial
14. Any planned surgical, percutaneous coronary or peripheral procedure to be performed prior to the 30 day follow-up from the TAVR procedure.
15. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
16. Trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated
17. Active endocarditis or sepsis within 6 months prior to the study procedure
18. Dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits)
19. Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve determined by echocardiography
20. Prior aortic or mitral valve surgery or pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position
21. Native valve annulus diameter is \<19mm or \>26mm determined by the screening CT scan
22. Extreme asymmetrical calcification of the native aortic valve determined by the screening CT scan
23. Echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation, or spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrium
24. \>3+ aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation or tricuspid regurgitation
25. Moderate to severe mitral stenosis
26. Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) \>5.0 cm
27. Presence of an endovascular stent graft for treatment of AAA or TAA 28 Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

29\. Patients with severe peripheral arterial disease that precludes sheath vascular access (e.g. luminal diameter less than 6.5 mm, severe obstructive calcification or severe tortuosity)
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Direct Flow Medical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

E. Murat Tuzcu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Patrick M McCarthy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Washington University Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Columbia Univ. Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland CLinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

G120160

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IP 011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id