Proactive Infliximab Optimization Using a Pharmacokinetic Dashboard Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The OPTIMIZE Trial

NCT ID: NCT04835506

Last Updated: 2025-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The OPTIMIZE Trial compares whether iDose dashboard-driven infliximab dosing (iDose-driven dosing) is more effective and safer than standard infliximab dosing for inducing and maintaining disease remission in inflammatory bowel disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are life-long chronic diseases characterized by transmural inflammation of the intestine. CD and UC are global diseases in the 21st century with increasing incidence in newly industrialized countries. One of the most effective therapies to treat patients with moderate to severe disease is the antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent infliximab (IFX) either as monotherapy or as a combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM), such as azathioprine or methotrexate (MTX).

Although more effective, combination therapy is associated with more serious adverse events, such as serious opportunistic infections and cancers, as well as potential treatment adherence issues. Consequently, many patients and physicians choose to use IFX alone as safety is often prioritized over efficacy. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients do not respond to induction therapy, and up to 50% of initial responders lose response over time. It is only if patients lose response that physicians check blood IFX concentrations (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring \[TDM\]), or empirically increase IFX dose. Reactive TDM helps to explain and better manage these patients with lack or loss of response to IFX. In many cases, the lack or LOR is due to low drug concentrations with or without development of antibodies to IFX (ATI). Unfortunately, reactive TDM or empiric dose escalation is often too late for patients who do not either respond to IFX induction therapy or lose response during maintenance. This reactive approach results in many patients losing IFX as a therapeutic option.

Preliminary data show that proactive IFX optimization to achieve a threshold drug concentration during maintenance therapy (even if the patient is asymptomatic) compared to empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM is associated with better long-term outcomes including longer drug persistence, reduced risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and surgeries. IFX dosing by weight only (i.e., mg/kg) may not be adequate for many patients as interindividual variability in drug clearance and other factors affecting IFX concentrations and PK are often not accounted for. Dosing calculators take into account all of these individual factors and improve the precision of dosing towards better personalized medicine. These systems have already been validated, and personalized dosing has shown clinical benefit in patients with IBD.

This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study that plans to enroll 196 participants with inflammatory bowel disease. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IFX monotherapy with proactive TDM or SOC IFX therapy, with or without concomitant IMM therapy, and empiric dose optimization or reactive TDM, at the discretion of the investigator.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Crohn Disease Ulcerative Colitis Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

proactive infliximab optimization

proactive infliximab optimization using a pharmacokinetic dashboard

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Infliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

infliximab

standard of care infliximab dosing

standard of care infliximab dosing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Infliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

infliximab

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Infliximab

infliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females aged 16 to 80 years inclusive.
3. Moderately to severely active IBD, defined by a total CDAI score between 220 and 450 points for CD or a partial Mayo Score (PMS) \> 4 for UC (including a rectal bleeding subscore \[RBS\] ≥ 1), and at least 1 of the following:

1. Elevated CRP (\> upper limit of normal)
2. Elevated FC (\> 250 μg/g)
3. SES-CD \> 6 (SES-CD \> 3 for isolated ileal disease) for CD only and a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥ 2 for UC only.
4. Physician intends to prescribe IFX as part of the usual care of the subject.
5. No previous use of IFX prior to enrolment in the current study, unless the participant received 1 prior dose of IFX (within 2.5 weeks of enrolment) and met all eligibility criteria at the time of starting IFX and IFX was administered according to the requirements outlined in this protocol
6. Able to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial.
7. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participants with any of the following IBD-related complications:

1. Abdominal or pelvic abscess, including perianal
2. Presence of stoma, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, or ostomy
3. Isolated perianal disease
4. Obstructive disease, such as obstructive stricture
5. Short gut syndrome
6. Toxic megacolon or any other complications that might require surgery, or any other manifestation that precludes or confounds the assessment of disease activity (CDAI or SES-CD for CD or PMS, PRO2, or MES for UC)
7. Total colectomy.
2. History or current diagnosis of ulcerative proctitis (UC extending \< 15 cm from the anal verge), acute severe (fulminant) UC, hospitalised IV steroid-refractory UC, indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, colonic mucosal dysplasia, or untreated bile acid malabsorption.
3. Current bacterial or parasitic pathogenic enteric infection, according to SOC assessments, including: Clostridioides difficile; tuberculosis; known infection with hepatitis B or C virus; known infection with HIV; sepsis; abscesses. History of the following: opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to screening; any infection requiring antimicrobial therapy within 2 weeks prior to screening; more than 1 episode of herpes zoster or any episode of disseminated zoster; any other infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobial therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening.
4. Has any malignancy or lymphoproliferative disorder other than nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within the last 5 years.
5. Known primary or secondary immunodeficiency.
6. PNR to adalimumab, defined as no objective evidence of clinical benefit after 14 weeks of therapy.
7. Subjects with failure to a prior biologic, defined as PNR or SLR, will be excluded when a maximum of 40% of the planned enrollment (approximately 78 subjects) have failure to prior biologic exposure.
8. Concomitant use of oral corticosteroid therapy exceeding prednisone 40 mg/day, budesonide 9 mg/day, or equivalent, unless a tapering schedule is initiated with a plan to be off CS by Week 14
9. Presence of any medical condition or use of any medication that is a contraindication for IFX use, as outlined on the product label.
10. A concurrent clinically significant, serious, unstable, or uncontrolled underlying cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, GI, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the study results, pose additional risk to the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to participate fully in the study.
11. Pregnant or lactating women, to be excluded based on the physician's usual practice for determining pregnancy or lactation status.
12. Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to IFX or other murine proteins.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adam Cheifetz

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale University School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford GI

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone Health

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Atrium Health Center for Digestive Health

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

LifeSpan Brown University

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre - Children's Hospital

London, , Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Papamichael K, Jairath V, Zou G, Cohen B, Ritter T, Sands B, Siegel C, Valentine J, Smith M, Vande Casteele N, Dubinsky M, Cheifetz A. Proactive infliximab optimisation using a pharmacokinetic dashboard versus standard of care in patients with Crohn's disease: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label study (the OPTIMIZE trial). BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e057656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057656.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35365535 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021P000391

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.