Proactive Infliximab Optimization Using a Pharmacokinetic Dashboard Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The OPTIMIZE Trial
NCT ID: NCT04835506
Last Updated: 2025-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Infliximab (Remicade) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Crohn's Disease
NCT00207662
A Safety and Efficacy Study for Infliximab (Remicade) in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00096655
Study Investigating Tailored Treatment With Infliximab for Active Crohn's Disease
NCT01442025
A Safety and Efficacy Study for Infliximab (Remicade) in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00036439
Improving Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Through Better Understanding Infliximab Drug and Antibody Levels
NCT01787786
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although more effective, combination therapy is associated with more serious adverse events, such as serious opportunistic infections and cancers, as well as potential treatment adherence issues. Consequently, many patients and physicians choose to use IFX alone as safety is often prioritized over efficacy. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients do not respond to induction therapy, and up to 50% of initial responders lose response over time. It is only if patients lose response that physicians check blood IFX concentrations (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring \[TDM\]), or empirically increase IFX dose. Reactive TDM helps to explain and better manage these patients with lack or loss of response to IFX. In many cases, the lack or LOR is due to low drug concentrations with or without development of antibodies to IFX (ATI). Unfortunately, reactive TDM or empiric dose escalation is often too late for patients who do not either respond to IFX induction therapy or lose response during maintenance. This reactive approach results in many patients losing IFX as a therapeutic option.
Preliminary data show that proactive IFX optimization to achieve a threshold drug concentration during maintenance therapy (even if the patient is asymptomatic) compared to empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM is associated with better long-term outcomes including longer drug persistence, reduced risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and surgeries. IFX dosing by weight only (i.e., mg/kg) may not be adequate for many patients as interindividual variability in drug clearance and other factors affecting IFX concentrations and PK are often not accounted for. Dosing calculators take into account all of these individual factors and improve the precision of dosing towards better personalized medicine. These systems have already been validated, and personalized dosing has shown clinical benefit in patients with IBD.
This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study that plans to enroll 196 participants with inflammatory bowel disease. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IFX monotherapy with proactive TDM or SOC IFX therapy, with or without concomitant IMM therapy, and empiric dose optimization or reactive TDM, at the discretion of the investigator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
proactive infliximab optimization
proactive infliximab optimization using a pharmacokinetic dashboard
Infliximab
infliximab
standard of care infliximab dosing
standard of care infliximab dosing
Infliximab
infliximab
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Infliximab
infliximab
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
3. Moderately to severely active IBD, defined by a total CDAI score between 220 and 450 points for CD or a partial Mayo Score (PMS) \> 4 for UC (including a rectal bleeding subscore \[RBS\] ≥ 1), and at least 1 of the following:
1. Elevated CRP (\> upper limit of normal)
2. Elevated FC (\> 250 μg/g)
3. SES-CD \> 6 (SES-CD \> 3 for isolated ileal disease) for CD only and a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥ 2 for UC only.
4. Physician intends to prescribe IFX as part of the usual care of the subject.
5. No previous use of IFX prior to enrolment in the current study, unless the participant received 1 prior dose of IFX (within 2.5 weeks of enrolment) and met all eligibility criteria at the time of starting IFX and IFX was administered according to the requirements outlined in this protocol
6. Able to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial.
7. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Abdominal or pelvic abscess, including perianal
2. Presence of stoma, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, or ostomy
3. Isolated perianal disease
4. Obstructive disease, such as obstructive stricture
5. Short gut syndrome
6. Toxic megacolon or any other complications that might require surgery, or any other manifestation that precludes or confounds the assessment of disease activity (CDAI or SES-CD for CD or PMS, PRO2, or MES for UC)
7. Total colectomy.
2. History or current diagnosis of ulcerative proctitis (UC extending \< 15 cm from the anal verge), acute severe (fulminant) UC, hospitalised IV steroid-refractory UC, indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, colonic mucosal dysplasia, or untreated bile acid malabsorption.
3. Current bacterial or parasitic pathogenic enteric infection, according to SOC assessments, including: Clostridioides difficile; tuberculosis; known infection with hepatitis B or C virus; known infection with HIV; sepsis; abscesses. History of the following: opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to screening; any infection requiring antimicrobial therapy within 2 weeks prior to screening; more than 1 episode of herpes zoster or any episode of disseminated zoster; any other infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobial therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening.
4. Has any malignancy or lymphoproliferative disorder other than nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within the last 5 years.
5. Known primary or secondary immunodeficiency.
6. PNR to adalimumab, defined as no objective evidence of clinical benefit after 14 weeks of therapy.
7. Subjects with failure to a prior biologic, defined as PNR or SLR, will be excluded when a maximum of 40% of the planned enrollment (approximately 78 subjects) have failure to prior biologic exposure.
8. Concomitant use of oral corticosteroid therapy exceeding prednisone 40 mg/day, budesonide 9 mg/day, or equivalent, unless a tapering schedule is initiated with a plan to be off CS by Week 14
9. Presence of any medical condition or use of any medication that is a contraindication for IFX use, as outlined on the product label.
10. A concurrent clinically significant, serious, unstable, or uncontrolled underlying cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, GI, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the study results, pose additional risk to the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to participate fully in the study.
11. Pregnant or lactating women, to be excluded based on the physician's usual practice for determining pregnancy or lactation status.
12. Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to IFX or other murine proteins.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
OTHER
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adam Cheifetz
Professor of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
University of Chicago Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Rockford GI
Rockford, Illinois, United States
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Atrium Health Center for Digestive Health
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
LifeSpan Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
London Health Sciences Centre - Children's Hospital
London, , Canada
McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Papamichael K, Jairath V, Zou G, Cohen B, Ritter T, Sands B, Siegel C, Valentine J, Smith M, Vande Casteele N, Dubinsky M, Cheifetz A. Proactive infliximab optimisation using a pharmacokinetic dashboard versus standard of care in patients with Crohn's disease: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label study (the OPTIMIZE trial). BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e057656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057656.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021P000391
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.