A Multicenter Trial Comparing REMICADE (Infliximab) and Placebo in the Prevention of Recurrence in Crohn's Disease (CD) Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection Who Are at an Increased Risk of Recurrence

NCT ID: NCT01190839

Last Updated: 2016-02-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

297 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

REMICADE (infliximab) is a drug used to treat active Crohn's disease and is being tested in an experiment to see if it may be useful in preventing relapse of Crohn's disease after surgical resection. This study will compare the effects (both good and bad) of REMICADE (infliximab) to those of placebo. Placebo looks like the drug being studied but has no active ingredients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of REMICADE (infliximab) in preventing relapse of Crohn's disease after surgical resection. Patients will be assigned to a group that will initially receive either infliximab or placebo. Each patient who is allowed to join the study is put into a group by chance (randomly), like flipping a coin. There is a possibility that patients can receive both the study drug and placebo at different times in the study. If a patient is initially randomized to receive placebo, and their study doctor confirms that they have had a return of active Crohn's Disease symptoms, they can receive infliximab. If a patient is initially randomized to receive infliximab, and their study doctor confirms that they are experiencing symptoms of Crohn's Disease, they may receive an increase in their infliximab dose. Infusions will be administered at Week 0 and then every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 200. The study will use a measure of Crohn's Disease activity that will be evaluated at each visit and at any time the patient has symptoms suggestive of their disease getting worse in order to capture recurrence. During the study, patients who meet the study definition of clinical recurrence will be eligible to have a blinded infliximab dose increase of 5 mg/kg. In other words, patients receiving placebo would receive infliximab 5 mg/kg, and patients receiving infliximab 5 mg/kg would have a dose increase to 10 mg/kg. Approximately 175 sites will be utilized, and approximately 290 patients will be enrolled. The interval between the first and last dose of study agent is 200 weeks. The planned duration of study participation is a maximum of 209 weeks (with a 1-week screening period, a 200-week treatment period, and a final study visit at Week 208). Group I (infliximab infusions): infliximab (5 mg/kg) will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 200. Group II (placebo infusions): placebo will be administered by IV infusion at Week 0 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 200

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Crohn's Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Infliximab

Infliximab Type=equal unit=mg number=5 form=intravenous infusion route=intravenous use once every 8 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Infliximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Type=equal, unit=mg, number=5, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, once every 8 weeks

Placebo

Placebo Type=equal unit=mg number=5 form=intravenous infusion route=intravenous use once every 8 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=equal, unit=mg, number=5, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, once every 8 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Infliximab

Type=equal, unit=mg, number=5, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, once every 8 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

Type=equal, unit=mg, number=5, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, once every 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a documented diagnosis of CD confirmed by endoscopic, histologic and/or radiologic studies prior to resection or by tissue obtained at resection
* Have undergone an ileocolonic surgical resection
* Patients must also be at an increased risk of recurrence of active CD
* Patients must not have previously discontinued infliximab as a result of tolerability issues or they must be naive to treatment with infliximab. Provided patients meet the above criteria pertaining to infliximab, they are eligible to enroll if they received prior treatment with adalimumab and/or certolizumab
* Patients must undergo screening for HBV
* Baseline CDAI \< 200
* Have adequate blood and liver test values

* Have evidence of an active infection at the time of randomization or have had a serious infection not related to CD (e.g., hepatitis, pneumonia, or pyelonephritis), within 6 months prior to screening
* Have or have had an opportunistic infection (e.g., herpes zoster \[shingles\], cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis carinii, aspergillosis, histoplasmosis, or mycobacteria other than TB) within 6 months prior to screening
* Have any known malignancy or history of malignancy within the 5-year period prior to screening (with the exception of squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been completely excised without evidence of recurrence)
* Have any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the well-being of the patient or the study or prevent the patient from meeting or performing study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* Have a history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, prior to screening
* Have a chest radiograph within 3 months prior to the first infusion of study agent that shows a clinically significant abnormality, such as a malignancy or infection, or any abnormalities suggestive of TB
* Have macroscopically active CD which was not resected at the time of surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Biotech Inc. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clive, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Plymouth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Lees Summit, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Grapevine, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Fremantle, , Australia

Site Status

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Malvern, , Australia

Site Status

Nambour, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Litoměřice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Lÿneburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Almere Stad, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam-Zuidoost, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Dunedin, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottinghamshirecc, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia France Germany Hungary Israel Netherlands New Zealand Poland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Regueiro M, Feagan BG, Zou B, Johanns J, Blank MA, Chevrier M, Plevy S, Popp J, Cornillie FJ, Lukas M, Danese S, Gionchetti P, Hanauer SB, Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Sorrentino D, Rutgeerts P; PREVENT Study Group. Infliximab Reduces Endoscopic, but Not Clinical, Recurrence of Crohn's Disease After Ileocolonic Resection. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jun;150(7):1568-1578. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.072. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26946343 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REMICADECRD3001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2010-018431-18

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PREVENT

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR017080

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.