Effectiveness of an Intervention in Patients With Excessive Alcohol Consumption
NCT ID: NCT04811729
Last Updated: 2024-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
268 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-18
2023-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Design: a multicenter, randomized, cluster-controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms. PC professionals will be randomized to one of the two study groups: 1) Experimental Group (EG): MI-based approach; 2) Control group (CG): usual care. At least 50 family doctors, residents and nurses will participate, recruiting PC patients (n = 394). GE intervention: Training program to acquire specific skills on approaching risky alcohol consumption. It will consist of a workshop, with two video recordings of consultations with simulated standardized patients, before and after it, with each participant receiving formative feedback at the end. -Intervention GC: medical advice that is usually performed in these patients. To measure the knowledge and attitude of professionals in dealing with patients with alcohol consumption, they will fill out a validated questionnaire. In addition, expert evaluators, after viewing the video recordings, will fill out a check-list to check the attitude of each professional, using the EVEM Scale. -Study population: patients ≥14 years of age with risky consumption, detected by the professional in health centers in the province of Córdoba (Spain). Sample size: Assuming a loss rate of 5%, and the "cluster design effect", the number of subjects to be recruited is estimated at 394 (197 / group). Intervention control mechanism: each participant will be audio-recorded with a real patient in a randomly chosen visit, evaluating her skills with the EVEM scale. The follow-up period for each patient will be 12 months, with 4 visits (initial, per month, 3 months, and 6 months) and 4 interleaved telephone contacts. The main outcome variable will be the level of self-reported alcohol consumption and the AUDIT questionnaire score. -Statistical analysis by intention to treat. Descriptive analysis and initial comparability of the groups will be carried out, and the effect of the intervention (dependent variable: abstinence or consumption reduction and AUDIT score) will be evaluated through bivariate and multivariate analysis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Testing Delivery Channels of Brief Motivational Alcohol Intervention
NCT01291693
Alcohol Expert System Intervention for Problematic Alcohol Use
NCT00400010
Guided Self-Change Prevention Program for Alcohol Abuse in Adolescents in Educational Settings
NCT05281172
Brief Alcohol Intervention in General Hospitals
NCT00423904
Effectiveness of an Intervention to Reduce Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol Among Drivers
NCT02150278
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* GE intervention: they will receive a 20-hour training program to acquire specific skills on the approach to patients with risky consumption, which will consist of a workshop, with two video recordings of consultations with simulated standardized patients, one before and others after the same, each participant receiving at the end a personalized training feedback.
* CG intervention: they will not receive the training program in MI, instructing them to carry out the medical advice that they usually carry out in these patients (informative model); They will also be videotaped, in order to verify that the approach they carry out is not motivational. On the other hand, both groups will receive an 8-hour workshop on detection, management and approach to the patient with excessive alcohol consumption, based on the recommendations and the action algorithm postulated by the PAPPS. To measure the knowledge and attitude of the professionals of both groups in relation to the approach of the patient with alcohol consumption, they will fill out a questionnaire validated by our group. In addition, expert evaluators, after viewing the video recordings, will fill out a check-list to check the attitude of each professional, using the EVEM Scale, which has been validated by members of our group.
* Material and / or techniques to be used: The information of the participants will be obtained from tools already validated to assess risk alcohol consumption \[Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), the motivational interview (EVEM questionnaire)\] and satisfaction of the doctor-patient (PDRQ-9). In addition, the MCRS scale (Medical Condition Regard Scale) will be used to evaluate the attitude of health workers in the approach to alcohol, which has not been validated in Spanish to date. The Spanish validation process will be carried out by this research group. -Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Tool designed to identify risky alcohol consumption and comprises 10 questions divided into 3 conceptual domains. The first domain assesses recent alcohol consumption and contains 3 questions (frequency of consumption, typical amount and frequency of heavy consumption). The second domain assesses symptoms of dependence through 3 items (loss of control over consumption, increased relevance of consumption and morning consumption) and finally the third domain assesses harmful alcohol consumption through 4 questions (Feeling of guilt after consumption , memory gaps, alcohol-related injuries and environmental concern about consumption). A result equal to or greater than 8 is considered indicative of risky and harmful consumption, as well as a possible dependence on alcohol. -Evaluation Scale of the Motivational Interview (EVEM). 14-item scale with a score of 0 to 4, created and validated by members of our group, to assess encounters between professionals and patients in which MS is used. This scale analyzes: 1) empathy; 2) facilitation for the patient to position himself; 3) works in accordance with the patient; 4) use open questions; 5) perform reflective listening; 6) performs summaries; 7) validate the patient; 8) agreement of change objectives; 9) promotes the design of action / plan with the patient; 10) avoid discord with the patient; 11) develop a maintenance plan with the patient; 12) global spirit: evocation, collaboration, autonomy, understanding.
* Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9). 9-question scale that assesses the doctor-patient relationship in clinical practice. Likert-type scale with 5 categories: 1 ("not at all appropriate"), 2 ("somewhat appropriate"), 3 ("appropriate"), 4 ("quite appropriate") and 5 ("very appropriate"). This scale has been validated in Spanish and will allow knowing the satisfaction of the patient in the alcohol approach developed by the health worker. -Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS). 11-question scale that assesses the attitude of health workers in the clinical approach. It is a Likert-type scale with 6 categories (1 = totally disagree, 6 = totally agree). It will be validated in Spanish by our research team.
* Location: Health Centers of the Andalus Health Service of the province of Córdoba (Spain).
* Study population: patients aged 14 or over with risky alcohol consumption (28 Standard Drink Units -SDU- / week in men and 17 SDU / week in women) users of PC services.
* Sample size: the main evaluation criterion will be the self-reported consumption by the patient. Based on a previous study carried out by members of our team, and to detect a difference of 20% between the percentage of patients in abstinence (partial or total) between the EG (37%) and the CG (20%); for an alpha error of 5%, a statistical power of 80%, the size would be 220 subjects (110 / group). Assuming a 5% loss rate and being a cluster randomization system, we will take into account the "design effect". Estimates of the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) in CCT by cluster in PC show that they are generally less than 0.05. This ICC translates, for a cluster size of 15, into a design effect that corresponds to a factor of 1.7. Assuming this value, the size would be 394 subjects to be recruited (197 in each group).
* Randomization: The randomization unit will be the healthcare professional and the intervention unit will be the patient. Professionals will be assigned randomly and equally (1:1) to one of the two study groups. -Mechanism of control of the interventions: each participant will also be videotaped with a real patient in a visit chosen at random, also evaluating her skills with the EVEM scale.
* The follow-up period for each patient will be 6 months, with 4 visits (initial, per month, at 3 months, and at 6 months), in addition to four interleaved telephone contacts. -Study variables: The main outcome variable will be the level of self-reported alcohol consumption (UBEs) and the score of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
Intervention based on the Motivational Interview, previously receiving a training program
Motivational interview
The participants will apply an approach based on the Motivational Interview (Rollnick, 2008) in patients with excessive alcohol consumption, previously receiving a training program
Control Group
Usual care based on a health counci
Medical advice
Usual care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motivational interview
The participants will apply an approach based on the Motivational Interview (Rollnick, 2008) in patients with excessive alcohol consumption, previously receiving a training program
Medical advice
Usual care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC)
UNKNOWN
Progress and Health Foundation
UNKNOWN
Córdoba and Guadalquivir Health District
UNKNOWN
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luis A Perula
Doctor in medicine. Collaborating researcher of the project
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose Angel Fernández García, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Andaluz Health Service
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Distrito sanitario Córdoba y Guadalquivir
Córdoba, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALCO-AP20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.