Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization: A Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT04811430

Last Updated: 2021-03-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-14

Study Completion Date

2019-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a continuous needle tracking system on the accuracy, speed, and quality of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter insertion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A pilot study using simulated tissue was conducted with 49 US-based emergency department nurses to compare insertion of a midline catheter using traditional ultrasound guidance versus an advanced needle-tracking technology along with traditional ultrasound guidance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Catheter Related Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Randomized Traditional

Randomized to traditional ultrasound guided peripheral insertion placement vs placement with Cue needle tracking technology

Randomized Traditional

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional ultrasound guidance was utilized to insert Midlines on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology with real time needle tip tracking is used to assist ultrasound guided midline insertions on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Radomized Cue Needle Tracking technology

Randomized to traditional ultrasound guided peripheral insertion placement vs placement with Cue needle tracking technology

Randomized Traditional

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional ultrasound guidance was utilized to insert Midlines on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology with real time needle tip tracking is used to assist ultrasound guided midline insertions on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Randomized Traditional

Traditional ultrasound guidance was utilized to insert Midlines on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology

Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology with real time needle tip tracking is used to assist ultrasound guided midline insertions on simulated veins blocks not live patients

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Randomized Traditional Ultrasound method

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* US-based emergency department nurse who have placed 10 peripheral intravenous catheters in the past 60 days
* have placed less than or equal to 15 ultrasound-assisted vascular access devices in the past 60 days and have been practicing ultrasound-assisted vascular access no more than 18 months
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Becton, Dickinson and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Austin Convention Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P88008.0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ergonomics in Ultrasound Procedures
NCT06417021 COMPLETED NA