Custom Print Megnetic Levator Prosthesis Pilot Comparison
NCT ID: NCT04807855
Last Updated: 2021-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial to Improve the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis
NCT03818204
Magnetic Correction of Eye Lid Paralysis
NCT02988856
Clinical Trial Comparing Two Non-Surgical Treatments for Severe Blepharoptosis
NCT04678115
A Feedback-enabled Magnetic Device for Temporary Management of Blepharoptosis
NCT03812016
NMES to Improve Eyelid Functions in Cranial Nerve (CN) III and VII Palsy
NCT03239418
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary outcome is custom MLP fitting success defined as 8mm interpalpebral fissure size or greater, patient desire to engage in a 20-min trial, and comfort rated greater than 5 out of 10 after the 20 minute trial (all criteria must be met). These criteria may be met at any one visit in the prototyping process. Therefore, one prototype may fail but if subsequent prototypes succeed, the case will be rated as a success. Selection of the criteria was based on a desire to have both objective and subjective metrics. Eye opening of 8mm was selected because it is a functional amount of eye opening found to be useful to patients in prior studies (note that these patients do not have inferior lid malposition). We have used interpalpebral fissure as a primary outcome as opposed to Marginal Reflex Distance (distance from the corneal reflection to upper lid) in order to allow enrollment of bilateral and severe cases, and to provide a common outcome for both eye opening and closing on the blink. Desire to engage in a 20-minute trial was selected as a criteria because it provides some information on the patient's opinion of the device. Comfort greater than 5 out of 10 indicates better than neutral, and was selected as a minimum goal for success (median comfort in our prior study was 8 out of 10).
The statistical analysis method for the primary outcome will be an exact binomial test of one proportion to determine which condition is met for more than half of patients. If the prototype approach is successful for greater than half of patients after 20 minutes of wear there will be a large enough sample for a phase II study to warrant continued development.
Sample Size Calculation for primary outcome: With 10 subjects we will have 80% power to show that the success rate significantly exceeds 50% with a one-sided alpha=0.05 exact binomial test of one proportion when the success rate is 8/10 or greater, meaning 8 would have to succeed to reach significance. With 15 subjects the success rate would need to be 11 to reach significance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
the experimental arm
All subjects, the ptosis group and the normal group receive the same intervention.
The cMLP device
There is only one medical device we are testing, so only one intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The cMLP device
There is only one medical device we are testing, so only one intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
OTHER
Skelmet Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yu Cao, Mr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Skelmet Inc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mass. Eye and Ear
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Skelmet
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.