Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Using a 'Leapfrog' Design

NCT ID: NCT04791137

Last Updated: 2022-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

188 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-09

Study Completion Date

2022-01-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a 'Leapfrog' design (Blackwell, Woud, Margraf, \& Schönbrodt, 2019) with the aim of investigating feasibility of this design in the context of an RCT of an internet-delivered intervention. The leapfrog design will be applied to a simple cognitive training intervention, imagery cognitive bias modification (imagery CBM), completed over a four-week training period. The trial will start with the three arms described in the initial registration, but these will be removed and new arms added over the course of the trial on the basis of sequential Bayesian analyses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anhedonia Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The leapfrog trial design is a parallel-arm design in which participants and randomly allocated to one of several treatment arms on a 1:1:1... ratio. One trial arm is designated the comparison arm, and all other arms are compared to this comparison arm via sequential Bayesian analyses. Depending on the outcomes of the sequential analyses (based on reaching Bayes Factor thresholds for 'success' or 'failure', trial arms may be removed, or take the place of the comparison arm while the trial is ongoing, and new arms may also be introduced into an ongoing trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants are not blind as to whether they are receiving an intervention or monitoring only, but otherwise are blind to the status of which intervention they are receiving, i.e. 'original' version of the imagery CBM or an attempted improvement. Researchers are not blind to participant allocations, but the study is planned to be mostly automated, reducing opportunities to influence participants. Researchers will monitor performance of the arms as data accumulates, via the sequential analyses, and will therefore not be blind to outcomes as the trial progresses.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Monitoring

Participants complete weekly questionnaires (QIDS-SR, PMH, GAD-7) on a weekly basis but receive no intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Standard imagery cognitive bias modification

Participants are scheduled to complete a first introductory session then 12 further training sessions of a 'standard' imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention derived from that implemented in previous studies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Imagery cognitive bias modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The imagery cognitive bias modification intervention is derived from that developed via experimental psychopathology research (e.g. Holmes et al., 2009) and adapted for clinical applications in the context of depression (e.g. Blackwell \& Holmes, 2010; Blackwell et al., 2015). The intervention is a series of training sessions in which participants listen to training scenarios consisting of descriptions of everyday situations, structured so that they start ambiguously but always end positively. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves in the situations described as the scenarios unfold. It is hypothesised that via repeatedly practising imagining positive resolutions for ambiguous situations in the training sessions, a bias is trained to automatically imagine positive resolutions for ambiguous situations encountered in daily life.

Standard imagery cognitive bias modification plus additional rationale and transfer instructions

Participants are scheduled to complete a first introductory session then 12 further training sessions of a 'standard' imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, but in addition are first presented with a more extended rationale for completing the training, and during each training session are provided with instructions to practice retrieval and rehearsal of the training contents in between sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Imagery cognitive bias modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The imagery cognitive bias modification intervention is derived from that developed via experimental psychopathology research (e.g. Holmes et al., 2009) and adapted for clinical applications in the context of depression (e.g. Blackwell \& Holmes, 2010; Blackwell et al., 2015). The intervention is a series of training sessions in which participants listen to training scenarios consisting of descriptions of everyday situations, structured so that they start ambiguously but always end positively. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves in the situations described as the scenarios unfold. It is hypothesised that via repeatedly practising imagining positive resolutions for ambiguous situations in the training sessions, a bias is trained to automatically imagine positive resolutions for ambiguous situations encountered in daily life.

Standard imagery cognitive bias modification with frequent brief sessions

Participants are scheduled to complete a first introductory session then 40 brief (\~5 min) sessions of a 'standard' imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, with 2 per day five days per week for each of the four training weeks. In addition, as with the arm "Standard imagery cognitive bias modification plus additional rationale and transfer instructions", participants are first presented with a more extended rationale for completing the training, and during many of the training sessions are provided with instructions to practice retrieval and rehearsal of the training contents in between sessions. This arm was added into the ongoing trial on 30.05.21.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Imagery cognitive bias modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The imagery cognitive bias modification intervention is derived from that developed via experimental psychopathology research (e.g. Holmes et al., 2009) and adapted for clinical applications in the context of depression (e.g. Blackwell \& Holmes, 2010; Blackwell et al., 2015). The intervention is a series of training sessions in which participants listen to training scenarios consisting of descriptions of everyday situations, structured so that they start ambiguously but always end positively. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves in the situations described as the scenarios unfold. It is hypothesised that via repeatedly practising imagining positive resolutions for ambiguous situations in the training sessions, a bias is trained to automatically imagine positive resolutions for ambiguous situations encountered in daily life.

Standard imagery cognitive bias modification with a less intensive schedule

Participants are scheduled to complete a first introductory session then 11 further sessions of a 'standard' imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, with 3 sessions scheduled for each of the four training weeks. Sessions have fewer training scenarios than the "Standard imagery cognitive bias modification" condition and more varied task instructions. In addition, as with the arm "Standard imagery cognitive bias modification plus additional rationale and transfer instructions", participants are first presented with a more extended rationale for completing the training, and during many of the training sessions are provided with instructions to practice retrieval and rehearsal of the training contents in between sessions. This arm was added into the ongoing trial on 09.06.21.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Imagery cognitive bias modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The imagery cognitive bias modification intervention is derived from that developed via experimental psychopathology research (e.g. Holmes et al., 2009) and adapted for clinical applications in the context of depression (e.g. Blackwell \& Holmes, 2010; Blackwell et al., 2015). The intervention is a series of training sessions in which participants listen to training scenarios consisting of descriptions of everyday situations, structured so that they start ambiguously but always end positively. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves in the situations described as the scenarios unfold. It is hypothesised that via repeatedly practising imagining positive resolutions for ambiguous situations in the training sessions, a bias is trained to automatically imagine positive resolutions for ambiguous situations encountered in daily life.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Imagery cognitive bias modification

The imagery cognitive bias modification intervention is derived from that developed via experimental psychopathology research (e.g. Holmes et al., 2009) and adapted for clinical applications in the context of depression (e.g. Blackwell \& Holmes, 2010; Blackwell et al., 2015). The intervention is a series of training sessions in which participants listen to training scenarios consisting of descriptions of everyday situations, structured so that they start ambiguously but always end positively. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves in the situations described as the scenarios unfold. It is hypothesised that via repeatedly practising imagining positive resolutions for ambiguous situations in the training sessions, a bias is trained to automatically imagine positive resolutions for ambiguous situations encountered in daily life.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 or over
* Fluent German
* Willing and able to complete all study procedures (including having a suitable device/ internet access)
* Interested in monitoring their mood over the study time-period (one month)
* Score of ≥ 6 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, including ≥ 1 on item 13 (General Interest), indicating at least mild levels of depression symptoms and anhedonia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ruhr University of Bochum

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Blackwell

Postdoctoral Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon E Blackwell, Dr. phil.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruhr University of Bochum

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Blackwell, S. E., Woud, M. L., Margraf, J., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Introducing the leapfrog design: A simple Bayesian adaptive rolling trial design for accelerated treatment development and optimization. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 1222-1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619858071

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Blackwell SE, Schonbrodt FD, Woud ML, Wannemuller A, Bektas B, Braun Rodrigues M, Hirdes J, Stumpp M, Margraf J. Demonstration of a 'leapfrog' randomized controlled trial as a method to accelerate the development and optimization of psychological interventions. Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(13):6113-6123. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003294. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36330836 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

365

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Functional Neuroimaging in Depression
NCT00343070 COMPLETED PHASE2
Repeated Neurocognitive Measurements in Depressed Patients
NCT05991232 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression
NCT06230757 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2