Neural Mechanisms of Monoaminergic Engagement in Late-life Depression Treatment Response (NEMO)
NCT ID: NCT03128021
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
57 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-24
2023-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The second part of the study involves completing a series of 4 MRIs, which assess changes in brain function over the course of treatment. This research may help investigators to develop faster and more effective treatment plans in the future, as brain responses that are detected early in treatment may predict how well an individual will respond to antidepressant medication.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mechanisms of Antidepressant Non-Response in Late-Life Depression
NCT01931202
Brain Aging and Treatment Response in Geriatric Depression
NCT01902004
Pre-Treatment Positron Emission Topography Scanning for Increasing Success in Antidepressant Treatment
NCT00456014
Treatment Response of Geriatric Depression
NCT00754936
Apimostinel + Automated Neurocognitive Training for Depression
NCT06400121
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Depression in older adults is frequently disabling and is often resistant to first-line treatments, requiring more prolonged treatment trials than in younger adults, mainly due to its heterogeneous pathophysiology (e.g. vascular and degenerative brain changes). Currently, there is little neurobiological data to guide changing or augmenting antidepressant medications. Thus, there has been a heightened focus on tailoring treatment to optimize outcome as described in the 2015 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) draft strategic plan (strategy 3.2). While antidepressant clinical response may take up to 8 weeks, recent studies suggest that physiologic changes, as measured with pharmacologic fMRI (phMRI) are seen within 12 hours of starting a new monoaminergic antidepressant (1).
For this proposal, investigators focus on three major Cognitive and Affective Networks (CAN): the Default Mode Network (DMN), the Salience Network (SN) and the Executive Control Network (ECN). The proposed model suggests that monoaminergic engagement leads to core CAN changes, changes that subsequently are related to overall clinical response as well as response in specific symptom clusters such as negative bias, somatizations/anxiety and cognitive control. The same networks that are functionally connected while individuals are at rest, are also selectively engaged during tasks. Investigators' prior work shows that pharmacotherapy - regardless of type of antidepressant used - engages these specific networks at rest and during standard cognitive and affective tasks. Given the role of cerebrovascular disease in LLD treatment response, the moderating role of vascular burden on the proposed association between CAN engagement and treatment response will also be explored.
The University of Pittsburgh will recruit 100 older adults with LLD that will be randomized to receive treatment with either a very specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) or a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (levomilnacipran). A pair of fMRI scans one day apart will be used to measure functional connectivity (FC) associated with medication titration. Investigators will use a very early (12 hours after initiation of treatment) biomarker of treatment response, which, when validated, would decrease substantially the waiting time between medication changes. Additionally, this study will further increase knowledge of the acute neural system changes associated with monoaminergic antidepressants; this knowledge of mechanism is essential for both guiding LLD treatment research, and serving as an engagement target in LLD treatment research.
Note: The original study design involved randomization to escitalopram or placebo (instead of escitalopram and levomilnacipran). Therefore a subset of participants will complete the study according to this design.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The following information applies to the original study design. Enrollment according to this design was complete as of April 2018: During Phase I, participants will be randomly assigned to take escitalopram or placebo daily for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, participants who are randomly assigned to placebo will be given the option to have an open-label of escitalopram for Phase II. Those who did not respond to escitalopram in Phase I will be referred for alternate treatment. All participants, regardless of outcome will be asked to return for follow-up procedures.
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Escitalopram Pill
Participants in this arm will receive an initial dose of 5 mg. Further titrations will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability (maximum dose of 20 mg). The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.
Escitalopram Pill
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Placebo
Participants will be given a sugar pill (placebo) to be taken by mouth once daily for the 6 week duration of Phase I. As this arm is also double-blinded, participants will receive an initial dose of 5 mg and further titrations (maximum dose of 20 mg) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability.
Note: This arm no longer applies as of 5/16/18. Participants are now randomly assigned to Lexapro or Fetzima.
Placebo
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Escitalopram Pill (Phase II)
Participants who were in the placebo arm for Phase I who do not show signs of response to treatment by week 6 (defined as either a MADRS score of greater than 12 or less than a 30% reduction in MADRS score to be deemed a non-responder) will be given the option to have an open-label trial of escitalopram in Phase II.
Participants in this arm will receive an initial dose of 5 mg. Further titrations throughout the 6 week duration of Phase 2 (maximum dose of 20 mg) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability. The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.
Note: This arm no longer applies as of 5/16/18. Participants are now randomly assigned to Lexapro or Fetzima and the assignment does not change throughout the study.
Escitalopram Pill
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Levomilnacipran Pill
Participants will receive an initial dose of 20 mg blinded levomilnacipran. At day 7, the doses will be titrated to 40 mg of levomilnacipran. Further titrations (maximum dose of 120 mg of levomilnacipran) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability. The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.
Levomilnacipran Pill
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Escitalopram Pill
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Placebo
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Levomilnacipran Pill
Double-blinded, randomly assigned
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Current Major Depressive Episode or Current Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified or Dysthymic Disorder
* Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) greater than or equal to 12
* Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) score greater than or equal to 84
* MoCA-BLIND greater than or equal to 13
Exclusion Criteria
* Current suicidal ideation that cannot be safely managed within the confines of a clinical trial
* Alcohol or Substance Abuse (current or past 3 months) endorsed via phone screening interview or diagnosed by Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (SCID)
* Dementia of any etiology endorsed via phone screening interview or diagnosed by SCID
* Medical conditions with known significant effects on mood (e.g., stroke, current hypothyroid state) as well as unstable medical illness, including delirium, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular risk factors that are not under medical management Unwilling or clinically determined to be unable to taper from high doses of benzodiazepines (equivalent to \> 2 mg lorazepam/day) or other anti-depressant/anti-anxiety medications at time of screening. However, for participants who are prescribed low dose psychotropics for pain, sleep disturbances, and/or medical conditions (e.g. amitriptyline for peripheral neuropathy, low dose trazodone as a sleep aid), these will be allowed in most circumstances. We will include participants on certain dosages of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants (for medical reasons) as follows: amitriptyline up to 50 mg/d, doxepin up to 50 mg/d, trazodone up to 100 mg/d, and imipramine up to 50 mg/d. Participants will also be able to continue taking buspirone, an antianxiety medication. As per the examples above, the PI will decide if the participants are eligible for the study and if they may continue the current medication. Justification regarding all decisions will be documented in the research record.
* Inability to complete required assessments including brain MRI and blood draw
* Hearing/vision impairment precluding neuropsychological testing
* Difficulty conversing in English
* Clinical contraindication to use of escitalopram or levomilnacipran or history of treatment resistance to escitalopram or levomilnacipran
* Unable or unwilling to provide a secondary/emergency contact person
* History of stroke with residual symptoms, current epilepsy, or current post-concussive symptoms
* Clinically relevant hyponatremia (below 130 mEq/L)
* Significant renal impairment
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry
UNKNOWN
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Howard Aizenstein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Howard Aizenstein
Charles F. Reynolds III and Ellen G. Detlefsen Endowed Chair in Geriatric Psychiatry and Associate Professor of Bioengineering and Clinical and Translational Science
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Howard J Aizenstein, MD, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charles F. Reynolds III and Ellen G. Detlefsen Endowed Chair in Geriatric Psychiatry and Associate Professor of Bioengineering and Clinical and Translational Science
Carmen Andreescu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andreescu C, Reynolds CF 3rd. Late-life depression: evidence-based treatment and promising new directions for research and clinical practice. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Jun;34(2):335-55, vii-iii. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.02.005.
Delis DC, Kaplan, E., Kramer, J.H. Delis Kaplan Executive Funciton System Examiner's Manual. The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Jun;20(3):310-9. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823.
Tomaszewski Farias S, Mungas D, Harvey DJ, Simmons A, Reed BR, Decarli C. The measurement of everyday cognition: development and validation of a short form of the Everyday Cognition scales. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Nov;7(6):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.02.007.
Isella V, Villa L, Russo A, Regazzoni R, Ferrarese C, Appollonio IM. Discriminative and predictive power of an informant report in mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):166-71. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.069765.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY19120137
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.