Neural Mechanisms of Monoaminergic Engagement in Late-life Depression Treatment Response (NEMO)

NCT ID: NCT03128021

Last Updated: 2025-03-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-24

Study Completion Date

2023-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh is conducting a research study to learn about the changes that occur in the brain when individuals suffer from and then are treated for depression. The NEMO study has two main purposes. The first is to provide medication treatment to individuals ages 60 and older who are currently depressed.

The second part of the study involves completing a series of 4 MRIs, which assess changes in brain function over the course of treatment. This research may help investigators to develop faster and more effective treatment plans in the future, as brain responses that are detected early in treatment may predict how well an individual will respond to antidepressant medication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this competing renewal (Year 11) of the investigators' R01 which has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study late-life depression (LLD) pharmacotherapy (R01MH076079), the primary aim of this study is to characterize functional connectivity changes associated with initial medication exposure (12-hour challenge). Preliminary data suggests that these initial fMRI changes reflect monoaminergic engagement, regardless of monoaminergic class, and predict later treatment response. This study will test a neural systems level model that response in LLD is mediated by acute pharmacologically-induced changes in cognitive and affective large scale network.

Depression in older adults is frequently disabling and is often resistant to first-line treatments, requiring more prolonged treatment trials than in younger adults, mainly due to its heterogeneous pathophysiology (e.g. vascular and degenerative brain changes). Currently, there is little neurobiological data to guide changing or augmenting antidepressant medications. Thus, there has been a heightened focus on tailoring treatment to optimize outcome as described in the 2015 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) draft strategic plan (strategy 3.2). While antidepressant clinical response may take up to 8 weeks, recent studies suggest that physiologic changes, as measured with pharmacologic fMRI (phMRI) are seen within 12 hours of starting a new monoaminergic antidepressant (1).

For this proposal, investigators focus on three major Cognitive and Affective Networks (CAN): the Default Mode Network (DMN), the Salience Network (SN) and the Executive Control Network (ECN). The proposed model suggests that monoaminergic engagement leads to core CAN changes, changes that subsequently are related to overall clinical response as well as response in specific symptom clusters such as negative bias, somatizations/anxiety and cognitive control. The same networks that are functionally connected while individuals are at rest, are also selectively engaged during tasks. Investigators' prior work shows that pharmacotherapy - regardless of type of antidepressant used - engages these specific networks at rest and during standard cognitive and affective tasks. Given the role of cerebrovascular disease in LLD treatment response, the moderating role of vascular burden on the proposed association between CAN engagement and treatment response will also be explored.

The University of Pittsburgh will recruit 100 older adults with LLD that will be randomized to receive treatment with either a very specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (escitalopram) or a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (levomilnacipran). A pair of fMRI scans one day apart will be used to measure functional connectivity (FC) associated with medication titration. Investigators will use a very early (12 hours after initiation of treatment) biomarker of treatment response, which, when validated, would decrease substantially the waiting time between medication changes. Additionally, this study will further increase knowledge of the acute neural system changes associated with monoaminergic antidepressants; this knowledge of mechanism is essential for both guiding LLD treatment research, and serving as an engagement target in LLD treatment research.

Note: The original study design involved randomization to escitalopram or placebo (instead of escitalopram and levomilnacipran). Therefore a subset of participants will complete the study according to this design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to take either escitalopram or levomilnacipran throughout the 12-week trial.

The following information applies to the original study design. Enrollment according to this design was complete as of April 2018: During Phase I, participants will be randomly assigned to take escitalopram or placebo daily for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, participants who are randomly assigned to placebo will be given the option to have an open-label of escitalopram for Phase II. Those who did not respond to escitalopram in Phase I will be referred for alternate treatment. All participants, regardless of outcome will be asked to return for follow-up procedures.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Although this is a double-blinded study, one staff member will be unblinded regarding study randomization. Should the need ever arise, the blind can be instantly broken for the participant's safety and well-being.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Escitalopram Pill

Participants in this arm will receive an initial dose of 5 mg. Further titrations will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability (maximum dose of 20 mg). The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram Pill

Intervention Type DRUG

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Placebo

Participants will be given a sugar pill (placebo) to be taken by mouth once daily for the 6 week duration of Phase I. As this arm is also double-blinded, participants will receive an initial dose of 5 mg and further titrations (maximum dose of 20 mg) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability.

Note: This arm no longer applies as of 5/16/18. Participants are now randomly assigned to Lexapro or Fetzima.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Escitalopram Pill (Phase II)

Participants who were in the placebo arm for Phase I who do not show signs of response to treatment by week 6 (defined as either a MADRS score of greater than 12 or less than a 30% reduction in MADRS score to be deemed a non-responder) will be given the option to have an open-label trial of escitalopram in Phase II.

Participants in this arm will receive an initial dose of 5 mg. Further titrations throughout the 6 week duration of Phase 2 (maximum dose of 20 mg) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability. The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.

Note: This arm no longer applies as of 5/16/18. Participants are now randomly assigned to Lexapro or Fetzima and the assignment does not change throughout the study.

Group Type OTHER

Escitalopram Pill

Intervention Type DRUG

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Levomilnacipran Pill

Participants will receive an initial dose of 20 mg blinded levomilnacipran. At day 7, the doses will be titrated to 40 mg of levomilnacipran. Further titrations (maximum dose of 120 mg of levomilnacipran) will be decided based on clinical response and tolerability. The medication will be taken by mouth in pill form, once daily.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Levomilnacipran Pill

Intervention Type DRUG

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escitalopram Pill

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Intervention Type OTHER

Levomilnacipran Pill

Double-blinded, randomly assigned

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lexapro Fetzima

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 60 years old
* Current Major Depressive Episode or Current Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified or Dysthymic Disorder
* Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) greater than or equal to 12
* Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) score greater than or equal to 84
* MoCA-BLIND greater than or equal to 13

Exclusion Criteria

* History of Mania or Psychosis
* Current suicidal ideation that cannot be safely managed within the confines of a clinical trial
* Alcohol or Substance Abuse (current or past 3 months) endorsed via phone screening interview or diagnosed by Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (SCID)
* Dementia of any etiology endorsed via phone screening interview or diagnosed by SCID
* Medical conditions with known significant effects on mood (e.g., stroke, current hypothyroid state) as well as unstable medical illness, including delirium, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular risk factors that are not under medical management Unwilling or clinically determined to be unable to taper from high doses of benzodiazepines (equivalent to \> 2 mg lorazepam/day) or other anti-depressant/anti-anxiety medications at time of screening. However, for participants who are prescribed low dose psychotropics for pain, sleep disturbances, and/or medical conditions (e.g. amitriptyline for peripheral neuropathy, low dose trazodone as a sleep aid), these will be allowed in most circumstances. We will include participants on certain dosages of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants (for medical reasons) as follows: amitriptyline up to 50 mg/d, doxepin up to 50 mg/d, trazodone up to 100 mg/d, and imipramine up to 50 mg/d. Participants will also be able to continue taking buspirone, an antianxiety medication. As per the examples above, the PI will decide if the participants are eligible for the study and if they may continue the current medication. Justification regarding all decisions will be documented in the research record.
* Inability to complete required assessments including brain MRI and blood draw
* Hearing/vision impairment precluding neuropsychological testing
* Difficulty conversing in English
* Clinical contraindication to use of escitalopram or levomilnacipran or history of treatment resistance to escitalopram or levomilnacipran
* Unable or unwilling to provide a secondary/emergency contact person
* History of stroke with residual symptoms, current epilepsy, or current post-concussive symptoms
* Clinically relevant hyponatremia (below 130 mEq/L)
* Significant renal impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Howard Aizenstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Howard Aizenstein

Charles F. Reynolds III and Ellen G. Detlefsen Endowed Chair in Geriatric Psychiatry and Associate Professor of Bioengineering and Clinical and Translational Science

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Howard J Aizenstein, MD, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charles F. Reynolds III and Ellen G. Detlefsen Endowed Chair in Geriatric Psychiatry and Associate Professor of Bioengineering and Clinical and Translational Science

Carmen Andreescu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor of Psychiatry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andreescu C, Reynolds CF 3rd. Late-life depression: evidence-based treatment and promising new directions for research and clinical practice. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Jun;34(2):335-55, vii-iii. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.02.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21536162 (View on PubMed)

Delis DC, Kaplan, E., Kramer, J.H. Delis Kaplan Executive Funciton System Examiner's Manual. The Psychological Corporation; 2001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Jun;20(3):310-9. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9845158 (View on PubMed)

Tomaszewski Farias S, Mungas D, Harvey DJ, Simmons A, Reed BR, Decarli C. The measurement of everyday cognition: development and validation of a short form of the Everyday Cognition scales. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Nov;7(6):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.02.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22055976 (View on PubMed)

Isella V, Villa L, Russo A, Regazzoni R, Ferrarese C, Appollonio IM. Discriminative and predictive power of an informant report in mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):166-71. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.069765.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16421116 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH076079

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY19120137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine in the Treatment of Depression
NCT01558063 COMPLETED PHASE2
Treatment of Depression in Adults
NCT00073697 COMPLETED PHASE4
Pattern Separation in Major Depressive Disorder
NCT07139834 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1