Physiological Control for Mechanical Circulatory Devices

NCT ID: NCT04786236

Last Updated: 2022-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-14

Study Completion Date

2021-05-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of this clinical study is to compare our newly developed control algorithms for mechanical circulatory support devices based on physiological demand with the standard manual LVAD speed operation. Specifically it shall be demonstrated that:

* Suction is properly detected by the pre-trained pump flow estimation algorithm
* Suction events (due to changes in physiological demand) can be reduced by control algorithms compared to continuous speed
* If suction is encountered, it can be detected and cleared
* The pump reacts adequately to changes in patient demand due to physical activity
* Physicians pump setpoints (of requested speed for a certain heartrate) can be achieved safely.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients complete a set of tests in constant speed setting and repeat the same tests with physiological control algorithms turned on. Order is randomized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Patients undergo testings in constant speed mode and physiologically controlled mode on the same day. the sequence is randomized. The number of patients was chosen due to the fact (experience in clinical care of the patients) the anatomical situation, the pump position due to surgical implant and the patient condition can vary to a high extent.
Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Patients are blinded to their current control mode.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physiological Control Module for the Medtronic -"HVAD" Left Ventricular Assist Device

Software, which sets the device speed according to physiological demand, is activated for the duration of the tests (up to 4 hours). Every patient provides his/her own control, because sequences with active control and with standard pump operation are subsequently performed in randomized order (determined by permutated blocks).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Automatic Speed Adaptation for Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent
* Patients with known intraventricular or aortic root thrombus formation confirmed by transthoracic ultrasound diagnostic
* Known pathology of the coagulatory system
* Supra or sub-therapeutic anticoagulation (aPTT or INR)
* Suspected or confirmed pump thrombus (based on lab parameters, abnormal high pump power consumption or acoustic spectral analysis)
* History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (\<2 months)
* Hypertension at rest (mean arterial pressure \> 120mmHg)
* Cerebrovascular or musculoskeletal disease preventing the performance of daily life activities or exercise training
* Severe arrhythmia (e.g. long QT syndrome), ventricular fibrillation or required defibrillation - excluding the LVAD implantation - in the previous 2 months
* All contraindications applicable to the HVAS are applicable to this study.

The System is contraindicated:

* In patients with a body surface area (BSA) less than 1.2 m²
* In patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulation therapy
* During pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heinrich Schima

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heinrich Schima

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maw M, Schloglhofer T, Marko C, Aigner P, Gross C, Widhalm G, Schaefer AK, Schima M, Wittmann F, Wiedemann D, Moscato F, Kudlik D, Stadler R, Zimpfer D, Schima H. A Sensorless Modular Multiobjective Control Algorithm for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Clinical Pilot Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 25;9:888269. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.888269. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35548436 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REGALVAD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.