Study Comparing Osseodensification With Standard Drilling

NCT ID: NCT04779203

Last Updated: 2021-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-27

Study Completion Date

2020-12-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine how Osseodensification, a well-defined bone preparation procedure utilizing special densifying burs (a tool to prepare bone) compares to the standard drilling procedure utilizing regular bone drills, to possibly enhance dental implant healing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our postulated null hypotheses is that implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.

Study Objectives:

A.Perform a prospective clinical study to investigate implant primary stability through measuring insertion torque values (IT) and Implant stability quotient (ISQ) when implants are placed using a standard drilling protocol (subtractive surgical drilling, as recommended by implant manufacturers) compared to osseodensification drilling protocol in a split-mouth design.

B.Implant stability quotient will be measured once the implant is placed (immediate), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.

C.To investigate, and analyze these two surgical drilling protocols as function of different implant manufacturers with variations in diameter and length.

D.To further track trends in the use of osseodensification surgical drilling once the patient receives the prosthodontic reconstruction.

E.To share the knowledge generated from this prospective analysis through scientific publications.

Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed post osseodensification surgical drilling recommended by Densifying reference guide of the Densah Burs manufacturer, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the specific implant manufacturer.

Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.

After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.

Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:

Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.

Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/ mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.

Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.

After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow-up visits.

Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:

Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.

Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling according to the manufacturer Densifying Reference Guide, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.

Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.

After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.

Study Procedures:

1. The implants will both be placed in the upper or lower jaw. The type of placement preparation of the first implant will be determined by chance (like flipping a coin) with other preparation for the second implant site. Implant primary stability will be measured initially by measuring insertion torque values utilizing a commercially available and validated clinical torque indicator.
2. Implant placement procedure will follow the standard of care for both implants for pain management, aftercare and infection control.
3. During the weekly follow-up visits over 6-12 weeks, we will conduct a non-invasive measurement of Implant secondary stability utilizing the Osstell device. Osstell is a resonance frequency tester, which will create a gentle vibration in the implant and measure how much if any the implant moves with the vibration. The device will not loosen the implant. The standard of care is after confirming implant healing and high secondary stability is to initiate yearly follow up as needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Osseodensification

Osseodensification is a novel, biomechanical osteotomy preparation technique that preserves bone through a non-excavating drilling process utilizing specially designed burs with a tapered geometry and specially designed flutes progressively expand the osteotomy whilst compacting bone into its walls and apex.

Osseodensification Densah Bur

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.

Standard Drilling

Utilizing conventional drilling technique with standard bone drilling techniques.

Osseodensification Densah Bur

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osseodensification Densah Bur

Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Densah Bur

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient needs an implant placements in both maxilla and mandible.
* Patients are medically stable.

Exclusion Criteria

* Drug Abuse
* Patient should not have been in any other research study in the last 90 days from the study starting date.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jackson Implant Surgery

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salah Huwais

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Salah Huwais, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jackson Implant Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Salah Huwais, DDS, PLLC

Jackson, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JacksonImplantS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.