Immune Response Following Lobectomy Along With or Without Bilateral Transcervical Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy

NCT ID: NCT04778826

Last Updated: 2021-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Any kind of anatomical lung resection for lung cancer with curative intent has to be accompanied by formal mediastinal lymph node dissection. Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy through a cervical access (VAMLA) along with thoracoscopic lobectomies in the same setting offers improved radicality through bilateral mediastinal dissection, provide accurate staging, does not require single lung ventilation and hence ideally supports the concept of minimally invasive surgery.

Due to the VAMLA associated radicality, the investigator believes that using of VAMLA along with lobectomy could improve the oncological outcome of lung cancer patients. Furthermore, the absence of single lung ventilation during VAMLA could attenuate the surgically induced immunosuppression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Any kind of anatomical lung resection for lung cancer with curative intent has to be accompanied by formal mediastinal lymph node dissection. Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy through a cervical access (VAMLA) along with thoracoscopic lobectomies in the same setting offers improved radicality through bilateral mediastinal dissection, provide accurate staging, does not require single lung ventilation and hence ideally supports the concept of minimally invasive surgery.

Due to the VAMLA associated radicality, the investigator believes that using VAMLA along with lobectomy could improve the oncological outcome of lung cancer patients. Furthermore, the absence of single lung ventilation during VAMLA could attenuate the surgically induced immunosuppression.

The present study aims at:

1. The current project primarily aims at identifying the effect of reduced single lunge ventilation time during VAMLA-VATS lobectomy on the intraoperative production of oxygen radicals as well as its effect on the immune competence of patients undergoing VAMLA-VATS lobectomy as compared to those receiving VATS lobectomy Along with conventional unilateral lymphadenectomy.
2. Secondary, in line with the hypothesis that radical bilateral lymphadenectomy might results in a more complete oncological staging as compared to unilateral lymphadenectomy or lymph node sampling. The current project aims to compare the pre- and postoperative staging in patients undergoing VAMLA, as VAMLA enables a proper examination of all bilateral mediastinal lymph nodes.
3. Patient Follow-up will be continued for at least 5 years postoperatively in order to compare the oncological outcome namely local and distant recurrence, tumor-associated and overall survival in patients undergoing VAMLA-VATS Lobectomy as compared to those with VATS lobectomy. This issue is, however, a second endpoint of this study and will be independent of the primary endpoint.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Neoplasm Malignant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Compare the oncological outcome and immune competence between patients who undergo lung lobectomy with standard lymphadenectomy and those who undergo combined lobectomy and video assisted bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lung Lobectomy with standard ipsilateral lymphadenectomy

Lung lobectomy with ipsilateral lymphadenectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations

Lung Lobectomy with VAMLA

Lung lobectomy combined with video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy through the neck (VAMLA). The approach is similar to transcervical mediastinoscopy and allows for a radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations. Besides the benefit of bilateral lung ventilation during this phase of the operation a bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy offers improved surgical radicality.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lymphadenectomy

radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult
* non small cell lung cancer
* operable tumor
* indicated for endoscopic lung surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Spine LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Otto Wagner Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Salama

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Micheal Mueller, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of thoracic Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, clinic Floridsdorf

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed SALAMA, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4312770074221

Micheal Mueller, MD

Role: CONTACT

+4312770074201

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohamed Salama, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

combined Lobectomy and VAMLA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physical Stabilization in Post-VATS
NCT04735614 COMPLETED NA
Outside the Cage (OTC) Robotic Lobectomy
NCT05832112 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA