Immune Response Following Lobectomy Along With or Without Bilateral Transcervical Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy
NCT ID: NCT04778826
Last Updated: 2021-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-01
2023-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Due to the VAMLA associated radicality, the investigator believes that using of VAMLA along with lobectomy could improve the oncological outcome of lung cancer patients. Furthermore, the absence of single lung ventilation during VAMLA could attenuate the surgically induced immunosuppression.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Coaxial Drainage Versus Standard Chest Tube After Pulmonary Lobectomy
NCT04877925
Evaluation of Visceral Pleural Lumbar Lymphatic Drainage
NCT03628326
Use of Harmonic Scalpel to Decrease Lymphatic and Chest Tube Drainage After Lymph Node Dissection With Lobectomy.
NCT00591552
Inter Costal Catheters for Video-Assisted Thoroscopic (VATS) Lobectomy
NCT01213654
The Effect of a Combined Drainage Strategy in Uniportal Upper Lung Lobectomy
NCT04461652
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Due to the VAMLA associated radicality, the investigator believes that using VAMLA along with lobectomy could improve the oncological outcome of lung cancer patients. Furthermore, the absence of single lung ventilation during VAMLA could attenuate the surgically induced immunosuppression.
The present study aims at:
1. The current project primarily aims at identifying the effect of reduced single lunge ventilation time during VAMLA-VATS lobectomy on the intraoperative production of oxygen radicals as well as its effect on the immune competence of patients undergoing VAMLA-VATS lobectomy as compared to those receiving VATS lobectomy Along with conventional unilateral lymphadenectomy.
2. Secondary, in line with the hypothesis that radical bilateral lymphadenectomy might results in a more complete oncological staging as compared to unilateral lymphadenectomy or lymph node sampling. The current project aims to compare the pre- and postoperative staging in patients undergoing VAMLA, as VAMLA enables a proper examination of all bilateral mediastinal lymph nodes.
3. Patient Follow-up will be continued for at least 5 years postoperatively in order to compare the oncological outcome namely local and distant recurrence, tumor-associated and overall survival in patients undergoing VAMLA-VATS Lobectomy as compared to those with VATS lobectomy. This issue is, however, a second endpoint of this study and will be independent of the primary endpoint.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lung Lobectomy with standard ipsilateral lymphadenectomy
Lung lobectomy with ipsilateral lymphadenectomy
Lymphadenectomy
radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations
Lung Lobectomy with VAMLA
Lung lobectomy combined with video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy through the neck (VAMLA). The approach is similar to transcervical mediastinoscopy and allows for a radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations. Besides the benefit of bilateral lung ventilation during this phase of the operation a bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy offers improved surgical radicality.
Lymphadenectomy
radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lymphadenectomy
radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* non small cell lung cancer
* operable tumor
* indicated for endoscopic lung surgery
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Spine LLC
INDUSTRY
Otto Wagner Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Salama
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Micheal Mueller, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of thoracic Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, clinic Floridsdorf
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
combined Lobectomy and VAMLA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.