Social Integration During Psychiatric Inpatient Therapy as Predictor of Treatment Response

NCT ID: NCT04770038

Last Updated: 2023-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

87 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-10

Study Completion Date

2023-01-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present longitudinal study aims at (i) identifying neurobiological mechanisms associated with successful social integration during the treatment of inpatients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and (ii) improving biomarker-based predictions of treatment response by incorporating core metrics of social integration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Social connections have a strong impact on mental and physical health. Surprisingly, however, there is a paucity of studies probing the predictive validity of perceived social connections such as subjective social support and loneliness for the outcomes of inpatient treatment of BPD. Although social impairments are key features of BPD psychopathology, social integration has been largely neglected, which may therefore explain the minimal translation of predictive molecular or imaging-based biomarkers into the clinic. The investigators hypothesize that the assessment of negative cognitive biases at baseline will help to identify BPD patients who will experience less social support and more loneliness during inpatient treatment. Furthermore, an inclusion of social integration indices may increase the incremental validity for the biomarker-based prediction of treatment response.

In this longitudinal, observational study, data from 56 BPD patients will be analyzed to assess negative cognitive biases and the underlying neurobiological mechanisms with behavioral, neuroendocrine, psychophysiological, and neural readouts before and after one month of inpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). To evaluate pathological biases, the patients' data will be compared with a control group of 31 healthy participants who will also be tested twice. Neural readouts include structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements. The fMRI tasks will probe the processing of social touch, interpersonal trust, and interoception. To further investigate pathological distortions of social touch and interoception, interoceptive accuracy and comfort zones of social touch will be assessed. Further, patients and healthy participants will perform a positive social interaction task, accompanied by psychophysiological and neuroendocrinological measures. Psychometric questionnaires and semi-structured interviews will be used to monitor symptom load and social indices before, during, and after the inpatient treatment. Long-term effects will be assessed by questionnaires and interviews 8 and 20 weeks after inpatient treatment/waiting time, as well as after each DBT module (follow-ups). The investigators plan to conduct uni- and multivariate analyses of the baseline measurements to predict patients' social integration and treatment response during the inpatient therapy and examine treatment-related changes. The findings of this project may help identify vulnerable patients that benefit from adjunct therapies targeting negative social biases and improve biomarker-based models of treatment prediction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Group

56 BPD patients

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Evidence-based psychotherapy for the treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

Control Group

31 Healthy participants

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

Evidence-based psychotherapy for the treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willingness / ability to give written informed consent to participate in the study
* BPD patients: on a waiting list for DBT, BPD as primary diagnosis
* Healthy participants: free of current physical or psychiatric illness
* Fluent in German

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication for MRI investigation (e.g. agoraphobia, pacemaker, pregnancy)
* Acute suicidality, current substance dependence or primary psychotic disorder
* A history of head trauma or neurological illness
* Scars on a predefined skin area (approx. 20 cm) of the shins
* Healthy participants: current or past psychiatric inpatient treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prof. René Hurlemann

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jella Voelter, M.Sc.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oldenburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dirk Scheele

Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dirk Scheele, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruhr University of Bochum, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oldenburg, Karl-Jaspers-Klinik

Bad Zwischenahn, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.hurlemannlab.com/

Research group website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SANITY

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of AIT Study
NCT02518906 COMPLETED NA
MBT-early: a Single Case Experimental Design
NCT06212024 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING