Dose the Saline Reduce the Mucus Production When Water Exchange Colonoscopy is Used?

NCT ID: NCT04769739

Last Updated: 2024-01-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

301 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-04

Study Completion Date

2022-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to compare the left colon mucus production between carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation and water exchange (WE) colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be four arms in this study: CO2 insufflation (control group 1), WE with water infusion (control group 2), WE with 50% saline infusion (study group 1), and WE with 25% saline infusion (study group 2). The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The WE control group will use sterile water filling during colonoscope insertion. The study method will use saline filling during colonoscopy insertion. This study will confirm if using the saline infusion is a better method in reducing mucus production when WE colonoscopy is used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a single-site (Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan), blinded investigators, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). Felix W. Leung (from Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA) will be involved in the study design, data analysis, and report preparation, but not in patient enrollment. Randomization (CO2, WE with water, WE with 50% saline, WE with 25% saline) will be based on computer generated random numbers placed inside opaque sealed envelopes. The envelope (in pre-arranged order) will be opened to reveal the code when the colonoscopist is ready to insert the endoscope to begin the examination. This will be a comparison of two different insertion methods with four arms (CO2 insufflation, WE with water, WE with 50% saline, WE with 25% saline) to see which solution used in WE is better in reducing mucus production.

Patients who are willing to participate will sign an informed consent before starting the colonoscopy procedure. Randomization will be stratified by investigators and indication of colonoscopy (screening, surveillance, or positive fecal immunochemical test). All participating patients will receive conscious sedation during the colonoscopic examination. Randomization (prepared by statistics consultant) will be carried out by the method of random permuted block design (based on computer generated random numbers) with variable block of 3 and 6.

Control method: One arm of the study will include colonoscopy with water infusion during insertion as the control method. Residual air in the colon will be removed and sterile water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion. Another arm of the study will include colonoscopy with CO2 insufflation during insertion as an additional control method.

Study method: Two arms of the study will include colonoscopy with saline infusion of different strength, i.e., 50% saline and 25% saline, during insertion. Residual air in the colon will be removed and saline solution will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Mucous Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CO2 insufflation

Colonoscopy will be performed in the traditional fashion, with minimal insufflation required to aid insertion. Cleaning in the CO2 group will be performed entirely during withdrawal.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

using CO2 insufflation to help insertion

WE with water

Residual air in the colon will be removed, water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Water

Intervention Type OTHER

using water instead of traditional gas to help insertion

WE with 50% saline

Residual air in the colon will be removed, 50% salline (1:1 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

50% saline

Intervention Type OTHER

using 50% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion

WE with 25% saline

Residual air in the colon will be removed, 25% saline (1:3 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

25% saline

Intervention Type OTHER

using 25% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CO2

using CO2 insufflation to help insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

Water

using water instead of traditional gas to help insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

50% saline

using 50% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

25% saline

using 25% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female 20-75 years of age
* Positive screening for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)
* Subjects willing to undergo routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who decline to provide informed consent
* Patients known to have colonic obstruction, active inflammatory bowel disease, or active GI bleeding requiring interventions
* Patients known to have prior history of colonic resection
* Patients with genetic colorectal syndromes
* Patients who are scheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., hemostasis, removal of large polyp)
* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology classification of physical status grade 3 or higher
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Evergreen General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chiliang Cheng, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Evergreen General Hospital

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El Rahyel A, McWhinney CD, Parsa N, Lahr RE, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Room temperature water infusion during colonoscopy insertion induces rectosigmoid colon mucus production. Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1118-1121. doi: 10.1055/a-1182-5211. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32458999 (View on PubMed)

Anderson JC, Kahi CJ, Sullivan A, MacPhail M, Garcia J, Rex DK. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO2: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30367879 (View on PubMed)

Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20619405 (View on PubMed)

Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, Lien JM, Su IC, Tang CP, Hsieh YH, Leung FW. Randomized Trial Comparing Left Colon Mucus Production Using Water vs Saline During Water Exchange Colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 1;14(7):e00594. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000594.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37141104 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EGH-2021-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.