Rate of Progression of PCDH15-Related Retinal Degeneration in Usher Syndrome 1F
NCT ID: NCT04765345
Last Updated: 2026-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
44 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-08
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rate of Progression in USH2A-related Retinal Degeneration
NCT03146078
Rate of Progression in EYS Related Retinal Degeneration
NCT04127006
Natural History of Photoreceptor Degeneration in USH1B: Clinical Parameters and Validation of Functional Vision Tests in MYO7A
NCT07278843
Adaptive Optics Imaging of Outer Retinal Diseases
NCT05355415
Ocular, Vascular, and Genetic Findings in AMD Patients
NCT06015633
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goals and expected impact of this natural history study are to:
1. Describe the natural history of retinal degeneration in patients with biallelic disease-causing variants in the PCDH15 gene
2. Contribute to the identification of sensitive structural and functional outcome measures to use for future multicenter clinical trials in PCDH15 related retinal degeneration
3. Contribute to the identification of populations for future clinical trials of investigative treatments for PCDH15 related retinal degeneration
Study Objectives
The primary objectives of the natural history study are to:
1. Characterize the natural history of retinal degeneration associated with biallelic pathogenic mutations in the PCDH15gene over 4 years, as measured using functional, structural, and patient-reported outcome measures
2. Explore whether structural outcome measures can be validated as surrogates for functional outcomes in individuals with biallelic pathogenic mutations in the PCDH15 gene
3. Explore possible risk factors (genotype, phenotype, environmental, and comorbidities) for progression of the outcome measures at 4 years in individuals with biallelic pathogenic mutations in the PCDH15 gene
4. Explore variability and symmetry of left and right eye outcomes over 4 years in individuals with biallelic pathogenic mutations in the PCDH15 gene
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vision Cohort 1
\~25 participants with the better eye Screening Visit visual acuity ETDRS letter score of 54 or more \[approximate Snellen equivalent 20/80 or better\] and visual field diameter 10 degrees or more in every meridian of the central field.
The better eye is defined as the eye with better Screening Visit ETDRS VA. If both eyes have the same VA (defined as the same Snellen equivalent), then the determination will be made at investigator discretion as the eye with better fixation or clearer ocular media to permit highest quality retinal imaging.
The visual field (VF) is defined as the clinically determined kinetic VF III4e performed within the last 18 months prior to or including the Screening Visit date.
No interventions assigned to this group
Vision Cohort 2
\~15 participants with the better eye Screening Visit visual acuity ETDRS letter score of 19-53 \[approximate Snellen equivalent 20/100 - 20/400\] or (visual acuity ETDRS letter score of 54 or more \[approximate Snellen equivalent 20/80 or better\] and visual field diameter less than 10 degrees in any meridian of the central field).
The better eye is defined as the eye with better Screening Visit ETDRS VA. If both eyes have the same VA (defined as the same Snellen equivalent), then the determination will be made at investigator discretion as the eye with better fixation or clearer ocular media to permit highest quality retinal imaging.
The visual field (VF) is defined as the clinically determined kinetic VF III4e performed within the last 18 months prior to or including the Screening Visit date.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Ability to return for all study visits over 48 months
3. Age ≥ 8 years
4. Not planning to enroll in an experimental clinical trial for the treatment of PCDH15 for the duration of this study
5. Must meet one of the Genetic Screening Criteria, defined below:
* Screening Group A: At least 2 disease-causing variants in the PCDH15 gene which are homozygous or heterozygous in trans, based on a report from a clinically certified lab (or a report from a research lab that has been pre- approved by the Genetics Committee)
* Screening Group B: Only 1 disease-causing variant in the PCDH15 gene, based on a report from a clinically certified lab (or a report from a research lab which has been pre-approved by the Genetics Committee)
* Screening Group C: At least 2 disease-causing variants in the PCDH15 gene which are unknown phase, based on a report from a clinically certified lab (or a report from a research lab which has been pre-approved by the Genetics Committee)
Note pertaining to all Screening Groups: if a participant has a variant(s) of unknown significance, he/she would still qualify if there is at least 1 disease-causing variant(s) on the PCDH15 gene. The Genetics Committee will review unique cases where segregation analysis is not feasible to determine eligibility.
Both eyes must meet all the following at the Screening Visit for a participant to be eligible to enroll into the genetic screening phase.
1. Clinical diagnosis of retinal dystrophy
2. Clear ocular media and adequate pupil dilation to permit good quality photographic imaging
Exclusion Criteria
2. Expected to enter experimental treatment trial at any time during this study
3. History of more than 1 year of cumulative treatment, at any time, with an agent associated with pigmentary retinopathy (including hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, thioridazine, and deferoxamine)
Note: Pregnant women are not being specifically excluded from participation.
If either eye has any of the following at the Screening Visit, the participant is not eligible to enroll into the genetic screening phase.
1. Current vitreous hemorrhage
2. Current or any history of tractional or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
3. Current or any history of (e.g., prior to cataract or refractive surgery) spherical equivalent of the refractive error worse than -8 Diopters of myopia
4. History of intraocular surgery (e.g., cataract surgery, vitrectomy, penetrating keratoplasty, or LASIK) within the last 3 months
5. Current or any history of confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma (e.g., based on glaucomatous VF changes or nerve changes, or history of glaucoma filtering surgery)
6. Current or any history of retinal vascular occlusion or proliferative diabetic retinopathy
7. History or current evidence of ocular disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound assessment of visual function
8. History or evidence of active treatment for retinitis pigmentosa that could affect the progression of retinal degeneration, including:
1. Any use of ocular stem cell or gene therapy
2. Any treatment with ocriplasmin
3. Treatment with an ophthalmic oligonucleotide within the last 9 months (last treatment date is less than 9 months prior to Screening Visit date)
4. Treatment with any other product within five times the expected half-life of the product (time from last treatment date to Screening Visit date is at least 5 times the half-life of the given product)
5. Treatment with Ozurdex (dexamethasone), Iluvien or Yutiq (fluocinolone acetonide) intravitreal implant
8 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Usher 1F Collaborative
UNKNOWN
Marjorie C. Adams Foundation
UNKNOWN
Foundation Fighting Blindness
OTHER
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katarina Stingl, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Tuebingen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
The Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Duke University, Duke Eye Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHNO des Quinze-Vingts
Paris, , France
University of Tubingen
Tübingen, , Germany
Haddassah Medical Center
Jerusalem, , Israel
Radboud University
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
University Hospital Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Moorfields Eye Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol: RUSH1F Protocol
Document Type: Study Protocol: Protocol Administrative Change Letter (PACL)
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Foundation Fighting Blindness Public Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RUSH1F
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.