Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching According to the Neural or Muscle Tissue Involvement

NCT ID: NCT04763798

Last Updated: 2022-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-11

Study Completion Date

2021-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study. Methods: A randomised, blinded, assessor-blinded clinical trial was performed. According to the sample size calculation, a total of 35 subjects will be recruited from the International University of Catalonia. Each subject will undergo three hamstring stretching techniques on their dominant leg, Straight-leg-raise (SLR), Passive knee extension (PKE) and Maximun hip flexion (MHF) with an interval of one week on the dominant leg. Muscle elongation in each stretching modality will be assessed with the modified black saver sit and reach test and whether the technique generates a neural or musculoskeletal response when performing the structural differentiation manoeuvre.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Stretching

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Cross sectional study. Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
A single-blind (evaluator) randomized controlled trial

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dominant

All subjects will receive the three stretching techniques on dominant leg. Interventions will be performed in three different days and only one of the three stretching exercises will be performed in each session. The rest period between sessions will be one week. Stretching exercises will be perform in a random order. A random-number generator will be used for randomization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Straight-leg-raise (SLR)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Passive Knee extension test (PKE)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Maximum hip flexion (MHF)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Non dominant

All subjects will receive the three stretching techniques on non dominant leg. Interventions will be performed in three different days and only one of the three stretching exercises will be performed in each session. The rest period between sessions will bé one week. Stretching exercises will be perform in a random order. A random-number generator will bé used for randomization

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Straight-leg-raise (SLR)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Passive Knee extension test (PKE)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Maximum hip flexion (MHF)

Intervention Type OTHER

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Straight-leg-raise (SLR)

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Knee extension test (PKE)

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Maximum hip flexion (MHF)

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy subjects over 18 years old who signed the informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlos López de Celis

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos L López de Celis, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CBAS-2019-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.