Dexamethasone and Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT04762381

Last Updated: 2024-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-02-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is an alternative to laparoscopic surgery as part of a minimal invasive regimen. Several treatment strategies are followed to improve the overall outcome and minimize surgical stress. Glucocorticoids provide significant analgesic and antiemetic effects but its role in a fast-track, multi-modal setting is not settled when discharge is planned within 24-36 hours.

This study will evaluate in a randomized trial the effect of a single dose of 24 mg dexamethasone on women undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy with regard to surgical stress measured by c-reactive protein as primary outcome and, further, other stress markers like white blood cells. The postoperative recovery will be registered in validated charts and questionnaires for pain and analgesic use, quality of recovery, incontinence, sexual and work life. Furthermore, in a sub-analysis, transcriptional profiling will be applied to explore, which parts of the innate and cellular immune system is activated to explore the mechanisms of surgical stress response.

The hypothesis is that women undergoing robotic hysterectomy would benefit from peroperative glucocorticoid treatment on important life qualities like pain, fatigue, freedom of medications and resuming work and sexual activities. Further, future adjuvant peroperative regimens may be able to target the stress response in a more appropriate way

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Robotic operations in gynecology is one of the fastest growing fields in applied robotic technology.

In Denmark 4000 hysterectomies are performed each year on benign indications and minimal invasive techniques has risen from 35 to 80%. These operations consist of vaginal, laparoscopic assisted und the latest robotic assisted hysterectomy. Hysterectomy and prostate operations are the most common robotic assisted operations as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy.

Robotic surgery on benign indications in gynecology is still a discussion on the cost vs. benefit due to increased cost and lack of evidence on superiority in surgical outcome compared to conventional laparoscopy. For minimal invasive surgery is but a part of a complex series of treatment in a strategy, the so-called multi-modal regimen (1-7,16). By this, the day of discharge has dramatically decreased without compromising safety during surgery and postoperative recovery. However, not all single elements are proven for efficacy, let alone the specific targets for effect (16).

To further improve the overall outcome of surgery the surgical stress response are investigated, which includes inflammatory components and are of importance of postoperative pain and recovery (8,9,16). Here amongst others, glucocorticoids have proven to relieve pain in a number of procedures, applied in general surgery on colon, gallbladder, and breast, in orthopedic surgery on knee and breast surgery, and in gynecology, too, in laparoscopic hysterectomy (1-10,15,16). The dose of steroid to provide significant analgesic effect is, at least, dexamethasone of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg or 15 mg, which is substantiated in some reduction in inflammatory response (7,15,16). Glucocorticoids are known for analgesic, opioid-sparing and antiemetic effects but procedure-specific outcome are lacking. Similarly, the specific anti-inflammatory and sites of surgical stress-related responses are not well elucidated.

Aim The PhD study evaluate the effects of a single dose of steroid on acute postoperative stress response and pain after hysterectomy. The evaluation is on clinical relevant outcome that directly benefit the patients. We will measure surgical stress by c-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers based on transcriptional profiling, register pain and medication needed during hospital stay and after discharge, and when work and sexual function could be resumed.

Outcome The primary endpoint is reduction of postoperative c-reactive protein (crp) after robotic hysterectomy as an objective measurement of the stress amelioration by the given steroid. The rise postoperatively will be ascertained by two baseline measurements and every 4-6 hours after operation as long as the women is not discharged. The crp is not expected to be dependent on each operation team eagerness to perform well or the postoperative care to reach certain standards.

As secondary outcome we register pain scores from baseline to 24 h and later on, the postoperative analgesics medication from baseline to discharge and later on, quality of recovery (QoR-15D) in the latest 24 hours (12). Further, after discharge incontinence (ICIQ-UI), start of sexual life (PISQ-12/31), inflammatory markers, and resumption to recreational and work life will be ascertained in a diary. The baseline and early acute postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale, VAS) at rest and at movement (0-4 h postoperatively), late acute postoperative pain scores (VAS) at rest and at movement (24 h postoperatively); and cumulative opioid consumption (up to 24 h) will be registered. Part of blood samples will be stored for analysis of the cellular inflammatory systems by NanoString to explore the innate system and cellular activation (19,20). NanoString has the capacity to demonstrate activation of immune-related genes in the bloodstream during inflammatory induction and highlight an exciting role of immune competent cell in linking peripheral inflammation with immune activation and possibly anti-nociception. NanoString methodology investigates gene expression and currently quantifies the expression of 770 genes by determining the amount of messenger RNA (mRNA). mRNA is the end-product of gene transcription and, therefore, allows the study of gene up-regulation.

Monitoring cycles and levels of rest and activity will be done by an actigraph in a non-invasive method (13,14).

Hypothesis Women undergoing robotic hysterectomy would benefit from peroperative glucocorticoid treatment on important life qualities like pain, fatigue, freedom of medications and resuming work and sexual activities. Biological substrates such as inflammatory markers will be explored as underlying mechanism behind surgical stress response in order to direct perioperative medical interventions (19).

Perspectives and impact The randomized design will evaluate the effects of the single dose dexamethasone on the highest level of evidence. The anti-emetic effects of steroid are already incorporated in several guidelines on perioperative care; however, this study could further enhance our knowledge on minimal invasive surgery and optimize the treatment for surgical stress. The stress response in humans have evolved over millennia and is embedded in our genes but has no natural association with modern days surgery and may be ill placed and timely inadequate for recovery. The exploratory study may help identify pathways and specific mechanism in surgical stress that can be targeted in future to enhance women's recovery after surgery. The perspective is in further studies to target these specific sites in the immune activation.

Methods:

The PhD study in robotic hysterectomy will include a randomized trial with a single dose intravenously of 24 mg dexamethasone (Dexavit®) corresponding to 128 mg methyl prednisolone (Solumedrol®).

The randomization will be performed in Redcap and data stored the same place under each patient cpr.-no. but in a separate section. A person not involved in the project in any other form will perform the randomization. The patient will then receive the dose of either steroid or placebo saline intravenously, blinded to the patient and operation team (gynecology, operation ward and anesthesiology). The applicant PhD student will later enter the data in Redcap unknowing to the randomization results.

All women in the department operated by with a robotic assisted hysterectomy will be monitored and fill out a diary with validated questionnaires (names of quest.) to streamline the information gathering in a high flow work place and not to discriminate those outside of the project. These data will be presented as the drop-out analysis to evaluate the external validity of the trial. The flow of data collection is displayed below.

Sample size was calculated to be 49 women included in each arm on the primary outcome of c-reactive protein rising to the level of 40 mg/l with an expected reduction of 10 % a with a standard deviation of 7 calculated by https://clincalc.com/stats/samplesize.aspx (1,17,18). This may seem a parsimonious reduction but in practical terms, it translates to more than halving the need of opioids early and late postoperatively (2). On the assumption of incomplete data in less than 10 % of cases, 50 women in each group with complete data will be included. Robotic hysterectomy is a standard procedure in our department with about 80-90 hysterectomies each year, so we expect the study inclusion to last 1½-2 years.

Statistics Analysis are performed on the intention-to-treat principle with women on current use of analgesics as a subgroup analysis. The statistics will be unpaired and paired analysis (2-ways ANOVA) including relevant co-variates. Regression analysis will be performed with the primary outcome as dependent variable and the secondary outcomes and anthropometrics as dependent variable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inflammatory Response Pain, Postoperative Nausea, Postoperative Incontinence Sexual Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, double blinded trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Blinded, results enteree into RedCap, logged and masked for participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexamethasone

24 mg dexamethasone as single dose intravenously peroperatively

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone phosphate

Intervention Type DRUG

24 mg dexamethasone infused peroperatively

Placebo

saline infusion intravenously in a single dose

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexamethasone phosphate

24 mg dexamethasone infused peroperatively

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

glucocorticoid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meno-metrorrhagia,
* dysmenorrhea,
* fibroma,
* dysplasia,
* dysmenorrhea,
* ability in Danish writing

Exclusion Criteria

* current treatment with glucocorticoids, opioids and NSAID analgesics,
* diabetes,
* current treatment of malignant disease,
* renal or hepatic disease,
* unable to communicate in Danish language.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital of Southern Jutland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Herning Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Finn Lauszus

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Britta Frederiksen, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Gyn. Dept. Aabenraa Hospital, Sygehus Sønderjylland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gyn. Dept.;Aabenraa Hospital, Sygehus Sønderjylland

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lunn TH, Kristensen BB, Andersen LO, Husted H, Otte KS, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kehlet H. Effect of high-dose preoperative methylprednisolone on pain and recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):230-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq333. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21131371 (View on PubMed)

De Oliveira GS Jr, Almeida MD, Benzon HT, McCarthy RJ. Perioperative single dose systemic dexamethasone for postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):575-88. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822a24c2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21799397 (View on PubMed)

Jokela RM, Ahonen JV, Tallgren MK, Marjakangas PC, Korttila KT. The effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):607-15. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac0f5c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19608838 (View on PubMed)

Steinthorsdottir KJ, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK. Surgical stress response and the potential role of preoperative glucocorticoids on post-anesthesia care unit recovery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Dec;83(12):1324-1331. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11878-X. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28607335 (View on PubMed)

Lirk P, Thiry J, Bonnet MP, Joshi GP, Bonnet F; PROSPECT Working Group. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr;44(4):425-436. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100024. Epub 2019 Feb 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30914471 (View on PubMed)

Wijk L, Nilsson K, Ljungqvist O. Metabolic and inflammatory responses and subsequent recovery in robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study. Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;37(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28043722 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Robotic surgery and steroid

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robotic MIS With Dexter
NCT05537727 COMPLETED
Pain and Hysteroscopy
NCT05316506 COMPLETED NA