Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
187 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-01-31
2021-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence of The Bowel, Bladder, and Sexual Dysfunction Following Surgery for Colorectal Malignancy
NCT04134104
Prospective Randomised Study Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00782457
Endoscopic Visualisation of Anastomosis in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT04738240
Textbook Outcome in Colon Carcinoma
NCT05675904
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum
NCT04936581
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
patients undergoing ARR with primary anastomosis between November 2016 and December 2020 after centralization of rectal cancer cases
Rectal cancer case centralization
In November 2016, the decision to centralize rectal cancer patients to only one surgical unit was taken, with only two surgeons performing the procedures. Furthermore, a close collaboration with local Gastroenterology Units and General Practiotioners was started in order to increase colorectal cancer case referral to our unit. At the same time, we decided to promote the use of laparoscopy and to implement ERAS protocol in our colorectal surgery practice.
B
patients undergoing ARR with primary anastomosis between January 2006 and October 2016
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rectal cancer case centralization
In November 2016, the decision to centralize rectal cancer patients to only one surgical unit was taken, with only two surgeons performing the procedures. Furthermore, a close collaboration with local Gastroenterology Units and General Practiotioners was started in order to increase colorectal cancer case referral to our unit. At the same time, we decided to promote the use of laparoscopy and to implement ERAS protocol in our colorectal surgery practice.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elective setting
* anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis (with or without diverting loop ileostomy).
Exclusion Criteria
* inflammatory bowel disease,
* acquired or congenital immunodeficiency,
* preoperative infection,
* pregnancy,
* ASA IV,
* presence of synchronous cancers,
* abdominoperineal resection (APR),
* failure to perform rectal resection and primary anastomosis,
* emergency setting.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rome Tor Vergata
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Giuseppe Sigismondo Sica
MD, PhD, Associate Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REGISTROSPERIMENTAZIONI XX/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.