Outcome of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Open Technique in Management of Rectal Carcimoma

NCT ID: NCT05685680

Last Updated: 2023-01-17

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 50 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-12-20
• Study Completion Date: 2023-12-20

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death in the West, and rectal cancer accounts for about 25% of colon cancers

Low anterior resection has been the mainstay of rectal cancer surgery in low rectal cancer since the 1970s. Although the best efforts of experienced surgeons, The local recurrence rate is 3 to 33% in conventional surgery, while total mesorectal excision (TME) results indicate a recurrence rate of less than 10%

The evolution of the concept of TME which was first revealed by Heald.in 1982 made a major shift in the treatment strategies (Rodriguez-Luna et al,2015). The concept of TME was the most important event in surgery for rectal cancer in the last two decades, because even without a curative approach, the local recurrence decreased to 6 to 12%, and 5-year survival improved by 53-87% TME described clear definitions of distal resection margin (DRM), circumferential resection margin (CRM), and least number of harvested lymph nodes, so oncological outcomes improved, locoregional recurrence and survival rates also influenced .

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) may be associated with less blood loss, earlier recovery, and lower morbidity. Identification of the small nerves and vessels became easiear because of laparoscopic magnified view of pelvis and thus prevents these injuries (Sajid et al, 2019). Also, minimal surgical trauma will reduce the immunologic response and preserves postoperative immunologic defenses. This may lead to low rate of infections as well as low local recurrences and distant metastases in addition to, tissue handling with less manipulation, 'may reduces the spread of cancer cells

TME in obese males with low and anterior rectal tumors is technically challenging especially post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy due to distortion of the anatomical planes (Ng et al, 2014). In these patients, it is difficult to obtain a proper view of the dissection plane, in open technique which threatens the integrity of TME and carries the risk of positive margins, which is related to higher rates of local recurrence

LTME is a widely used approach for rectal cancers; although conversion rate varies from 1.2 to 17%, and it is higher if BMI is equal to or more than 30

Conditions

Rectal Carcinoma

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Group A laparoscopic group

group A laparoscopic surgery

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total mesorectal excision in rectal carcinoma

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

total mesorectal excision laparoscopic versus open technique in management of rectal carcinoma

Group B

Group B open surgery

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total mesorectal excision in rectal carcinoma

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

total mesorectal excision laparoscopic versus open technique in management of rectal carcinoma

Interventions

total mesorectal excision in rectal carcinoma

total mesorectal excision laparoscopic versus open technique in management of rectal carcinoma

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• All patients with pathologically confirmed rectal carcinoma involving middle or lower third rectum and operable by MRI and CT scan criteria.
• Both sexes will be included.
• Age: ranging from 20 to 70 years.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with stage IV.
• Recurrent rectal cancers.
• Combined malignancy.
• Patients admitted due to emergency situations (acute large bowel obstruction, abdominal abscess, or rectal perforation and hemorrhage).
• Patients with contraindication for laparoscopic surgery.
• Unfit patients (ASA score > II).

• Minimum Eligible Age: 20 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 70 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Osama Saleh Ahmed

Assistant lecture ofgeneral surgery

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Sohag University Hospital

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Egypt

Central Contacts

osama s saleh, assistant lecture

Role: CONTACT

usama.mohamed@med.sohag.edu.eg

01119966457

omar A abd el-raheem, professor

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Magdy M Amin, professor

Role: primary

References

Cecil TD, Sexton R, Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1145-9; discussion 1149-50. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0086-6. Epub 2004 Jun 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15164243 (View on PubMed)

Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Apr;50(4):464-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17195085 (View on PubMed)

Hill GL, Rafique M. Extrafascial excision of the rectum for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):809-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00735.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9667714 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Soh-Med-22-12-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id