AI Augmented Training for Skin Specialists

NCT ID: NCT04758988

Last Updated: 2024-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-15

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

The worldwide incidence of skin cancer has been rising for 50 years, in particular the incidence of malignant melanoma has increased approx. 2-7% annually and is the most common cancer amongst Danes aged 15-34. Currently there is a significant amount of misdiagnosis of skin cancer and mole cancer, and most excised skin lesions are benign.

Previous studies have shown that there is no significant increase in doctors diagnostic accuracy during the first 6 years of clinical work.

The resources spend on healthy people could be put to better use, if the Benign-Malignant Ratio could be lowered. This could potentially be done by better educating the doctors during their everyday clinical practice.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to investigate the dose/response effect of an AI augmented training and clinical feedback on the diagnostic accuracy of skin cancer and clinical decisions among doctors from specialized skin cancer centers.

Research question: How much specialized doctors need to train before their diagnostic accuracy and clinical decisions change?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design:

This study is a superiority trial designed as an international multicenter randomized controlled trial of doctors in highly specialized centers that diagnose and/or treat skin- and mole cancer.

Randomization Eligible participants will be randomized into either the intervention or control group, ratio 1:1.

Intervention:

The participants of group A are given access to a digital educational online system developed by the research group, are asked to register all skin lesions seen with a registration app (clinical and dermoscopic photos and clinical data), also developed by the research group, and will be given clinical feedback on every registered skin lesion.

Participants in group B are also asked from day one to register all skin lesions and will receive feedback on these as the participants of group A, but are withheld their access to the digital educational online system for 2 months.

Feedback on removed/biopsied skin lesions is given directly from the pathologist, who in turn are given easy access to photographs and clinical data of the patient and skin lesion in question.

Statistics:

The average increase in diagnostic accuracy for the population of participating doctors as an effect of the hours spent with the digital educational online system is calculated using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).

As benign lesions can be excised/treated for other reasons than suspicion of malignancy we will analyze correctly diagnosed benign lesions treated for different reasons (cosmetic or functional complaints etc.) separately.

We expect a majority of registered lesions to be benign, despite most of the patients already having been seen by GPs before referral.

Ethical considerations:

Patient participation contains no immediate strain or discomfort for the patient, and no change to current clinical practice, as dermoscopic evaluation is part of the clinical examination of skin lesions. The images captured are stored safely and anonymously with no risk for the patient.

With the current low diagnostic accuracy of young doctors the educational nature of the intervention justifies the study for the sake of all future patients with skin lesions that are less likely to be misdiagnosed.

Educational interventions on doctors do not require approval by The National Committee on Health Research Ethics in Denmark. However ethical considerations have been made and the project is in concordance with the Helsinki Declaration II.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma Skin Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized superiority clinical trial. Participating doctors are randomized to either group A or B in a 1:1 ratio.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Participating doctors are either given access to an AI augmented digital educational online system or not. During the study period, doctors of both groups are registering skin lesions they encounter in their daily practice using the same hardware and software.

The expert dermatologists that evaluate the registered skin lesions are unaware of the registering doctors allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

This group will receive access to the AI augmented digital online educational system and its two modules (Training Module and Clinical Feedback Module). They will receive continuous clinical feedback on their registered lesions.

Group Type OTHER

DermLoop Learn

Intervention Type OTHER

DermLoop Learn is our AI augmented digital online educational system with case training on a library of 10,000+ benign and malignant skin lesion as well as written learning modules for the most common skin lesion diagnosis.

Group B

This group is withheld their access to the AI augmented digital online educational system for 2 months.

After the 2 months delay, the subjects in the group are given the same access as the participants in Group A.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DermLoop Learn

DermLoop Learn is our AI augmented digital online educational system with case training on a library of 10,000+ benign and malignant skin lesion as well as written learning modules for the most common skin lesion diagnosis.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Doctors are required to work at a specialized skin department (dermatology or plastic surgery or the like).
* Doctors must be registered authorized health personnel

Exclusion Criteria

* Doctors that have previously received access to the DermLoop Learn educational intervention
* Doctors with less than 2 months left of their affiliation with their current department of employment
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Herlev Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gustav Gede Nervil

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gustav G Nervil, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herlev Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Herlev Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Gentofte Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AISC-SS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DERM Health Economics Study
NCT04123678 COMPLETED
DERM US and EU Validation Study
NCT05126173 COMPLETED