Does the Aid of MelaFind Affect Clinical Management Decisions
NCT ID: NCT01387581
Last Updated: 2014-11-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
227 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-10-31
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Another objective is to determine and compare the performance of dermatologists (in Germany) with and without the aid of MelaFind. The hypothesis is that the average excision sensitivity of dermatologists with the aid of MelaFind is superior to the average excision sensitivity of dermatologists without the aid of MelaFind.
A similar study was previously conducted with dermatologists in the US (NCT01011153). An exploratory objective is to compare the excision decisions of dermatologists from the previous study (in the US) to dermatologists in in this study (in Germany).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This survey study will determine and compare the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists (in Germany) without MelaFind output to the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists (in Germany) with MelaFind output. Another purpose is to determine and compare the sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of MelaFind to the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists without MelaFind output.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Without MelaFind
Study dermatologists will review clinical exam information and 3 high quality digital images for each lesion without MelaFind result.
No interventions assigned to this group
With MelaFind
Study dermatologists will review clinical exam information, 3 high quality digital images, and MelaFind result for each lesion
No interventions assigned to this group
Experts Without MelaFind
PSL Experts, prospectively identified and recruited by the PI after the general recruitment is completed. They will review clinical exam information and 3 high quality digital images for each lesion without MelaFind result.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MELA Sciences, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Axel Hauschild, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MELA Sciences
Irvington, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id