Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy OF Botulinum Toxin A for Improving Facial Scars

NCT ID: NCT04756882

Last Updated: 2021-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-18

Study Completion Date

2021-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Scars widen when the overlying musculature pulls apart suture lines. Because Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) is known to prevent fibroblast proliferation and it also induces temporary muscle paralysis, the purpose of this current study is to evaluate the beneficial effects of Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) on scar formation.

Aim of this study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early postoperative Botulinum Toxin type A (BTA) injection on improving vertical or oblique facial surgical scars.

Materials and methods: Patients with vertical or oblique forehead lacerations, treated by primary closure, will be enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups: One group (n =6) will receive BTA injection within 5 days of primary closure and the other group (n = 6) will receive no further treatment. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) Scores and wound width will be determined at the 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up visits, along with clinical photographs.

Results: Data will be collected, tabulated and statically analyzed. Key words: Botulinum Toxin Type A; facial scarring; wound healing; scar maturation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Alexandria University.
2. Using nonalcoholic solution after makeup removal, a single surgeon performed the procedures under complete aseptic technique (Lee, Min et al. 2018).
3. All patients wore a disposable cap to contain hair.
4. We examined before treatment: the facial anatomy, mimic muscular contraction, facial expression, and any pre-existing asymmetry(Wilson 2006).
5. Immediately after taking the photographs, both the length and width of the forehead wound were measured directly on the patients using a digital vernier caliper by a single plastic surgeon blinded to the study condition.
6. Pain at the injected sites was minimized before each injection by applying topical anesthetics and cold iced devices.
7. Micro fine 1.0 ml insulin syringes with a 29-G or 30-G needle were used.
8. The dosages of the preparations are related to biological activity and are given in biological units (U). The units are termed according to the manufacturer as Speywood U (SU) for Dysport
9. The drugs used were AboBotulinumToxin A Dysport (500 Speywood U) is to be reconstituted with 2.0 mL of sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) injection solution. This results in a clear solution containing the 500 Speywood units of the active ingredient in a concentration of 250 units per 1.0 mL of the reconstituted solution. The reconstitution is to be performed in accordance with the rules of good clinical practice, particularly with respect to asepsis and within 15 day of reconstitutin.(Hexsel, Rutowitsch et al. 2009, Scaglione 2016, Lee, Min et al. 2018).
10. The total dose is approximately 105 SU.
11. The total dose is divieded into 75 SU injected by a (1-ml, , 30-gauge needle) insulin syringe along the scar length at the rate of approximately 12.5 SU (0.15 ml) per cm of wound length, in a linear pattern on either side of the wound. , with the needle prick positined approximately 5 mm from the edge of the wound, The injection was repeated every cm throughout the entire wound length and 30 SU are injected into frontalis muscle.(Wilson 2006, Hu, Zou et al. 2018, Kim, Lee et al. 2019)
12. Injections were determined by a skin marker and done under the supervision of a qualified licensed supervisor.
13. due to muscles contraction The injections were carried out on skin folds and are performed at different levels (intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intradermal) in more points for each region. The injections were administrated directly into the point of intense muscular contraction. On the other hand, where the contraction was weak, the injection was done at a deep or superficial intradermal level. Depth depends also on the effect we want to achieve: an extreme effect for intramuscular, a soft effect for subcutaneous or intradermal.(Iozzo, Tengattini et al. 2014)
14. To prevent eyebrow ptosis, the drugs were not injected around the supraorbital rim.(Kim, Lee et al. 2019).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertrophic Scarring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study group

6 patients received 12.5 speywood unit/cm (SU/cm) Dysport intramuscular \& intradermal injections, within the first 5 postoperative days of the trauma

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AbobotulinumtoxinA 500 UNT

Intervention Type DRUG

Anaerobic fermentation of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum produces botulinum toxin. A range of different C. Botulinum strains have been recognized; eight immunologically different serotypes (type A-H) are created and consist of botulinum neurotoxin complexed with a number of related proteins.

Neurotoxin type A preparations are the most widely used for therapeutic application. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products on the market in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA; Botox/Vistabel, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), abobotulinum toxin A (ABO; Dysport/Ipsen Limited, Slough Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO; Xeomin/Bocouture, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). In nature, BoNT-A is synthesized as macromolecular protein complexes

control group

of 6 patients that acted as the control group and received no treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AbobotulinumtoxinA 500 UNT

Anaerobic fermentation of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum produces botulinum toxin. A range of different C. Botulinum strains have been recognized; eight immunologically different serotypes (type A-H) are created and consist of botulinum neurotoxin complexed with a number of related proteins.

Neurotoxin type A preparations are the most widely used for therapeutic application. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products on the market in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA; Botox/Vistabel, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), abobotulinum toxin A (ABO; Dysport/Ipsen Limited, Slough Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO; Xeomin/Bocouture, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). In nature, BoNT-A is synthesized as macromolecular protein complexes

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dysport

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Patients aged from 18 to 40 years.

* Patients free from any systemic disease.
* Patients who understand verbal and written instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* • Patients with horizontal forehead lacerations.

* Patients suffering from complicated forehead lacerations that require grafting.
* Patients with forehead burns.
* Patients with neuromuscular disorders.
* Patients with previous surgical or non-surgical intervention.
* Patients allergic to drugs used in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Omnia Shetta

researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mahitab M soliman, phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alexandria University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

oral & maxillofacial surgery department ,faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university

Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Oshetta

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.