Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy OF Botulinum Toxin A for Improving Facial Scars
NCT ID: NCT04756882
Last Updated: 2021-02-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-18
2021-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim of this study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early postoperative Botulinum Toxin type A (BTA) injection on improving vertical or oblique facial surgical scars.
Materials and methods: Patients with vertical or oblique forehead lacerations, treated by primary closure, will be enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups: One group (n =6) will receive BTA injection within 5 days of primary closure and the other group (n = 6) will receive no further treatment. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) Scores and wound width will be determined at the 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up visits, along with clinical photographs.
Results: Data will be collected, tabulated and statically analyzed. Key words: Botulinum Toxin Type A; facial scarring; wound healing; scar maturation
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Botulinum Toxin Injection in Reducing Scar Following Cheilorrhaphy.
NCT07137234
Use of Botulinum Toxin A in Direct Eyebrow Lift Scar
NCT06465056
Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Biopsy Scar Minimization
NCT05478551
Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin A in Preventing Scar Formation and Initial Exploration of "Optimal Concentration"
NCT06437912
The Efficacy and Molecular Mechanism of Botulinum Toxin in the Reduction of Breast Reduction Mammoplasty Scar Formation
NCT03887377
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Using nonalcoholic solution after makeup removal, a single surgeon performed the procedures under complete aseptic technique (Lee, Min et al. 2018).
3. All patients wore a disposable cap to contain hair.
4. We examined before treatment: the facial anatomy, mimic muscular contraction, facial expression, and any pre-existing asymmetry(Wilson 2006).
5. Immediately after taking the photographs, both the length and width of the forehead wound were measured directly on the patients using a digital vernier caliper by a single plastic surgeon blinded to the study condition.
6. Pain at the injected sites was minimized before each injection by applying topical anesthetics and cold iced devices.
7. Micro fine 1.0 ml insulin syringes with a 29-G or 30-G needle were used.
8. The dosages of the preparations are related to biological activity and are given in biological units (U). The units are termed according to the manufacturer as Speywood U (SU) for Dysport
9. The drugs used were AboBotulinumToxin A Dysport (500 Speywood U) is to be reconstituted with 2.0 mL of sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) injection solution. This results in a clear solution containing the 500 Speywood units of the active ingredient in a concentration of 250 units per 1.0 mL of the reconstituted solution. The reconstitution is to be performed in accordance with the rules of good clinical practice, particularly with respect to asepsis and within 15 day of reconstitutin.(Hexsel, Rutowitsch et al. 2009, Scaglione 2016, Lee, Min et al. 2018).
10. The total dose is approximately 105 SU.
11. The total dose is divieded into 75 SU injected by a (1-ml, , 30-gauge needle) insulin syringe along the scar length at the rate of approximately 12.5 SU (0.15 ml) per cm of wound length, in a linear pattern on either side of the wound. , with the needle prick positined approximately 5 mm from the edge of the wound, The injection was repeated every cm throughout the entire wound length and 30 SU are injected into frontalis muscle.(Wilson 2006, Hu, Zou et al. 2018, Kim, Lee et al. 2019)
12. Injections were determined by a skin marker and done under the supervision of a qualified licensed supervisor.
13. due to muscles contraction The injections were carried out on skin folds and are performed at different levels (intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intradermal) in more points for each region. The injections were administrated directly into the point of intense muscular contraction. On the other hand, where the contraction was weak, the injection was done at a deep or superficial intradermal level. Depth depends also on the effect we want to achieve: an extreme effect for intramuscular, a soft effect for subcutaneous or intradermal.(Iozzo, Tengattini et al. 2014)
14. To prevent eyebrow ptosis, the drugs were not injected around the supraorbital rim.(Kim, Lee et al. 2019).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
study group
6 patients received 12.5 speywood unit/cm (SU/cm) Dysport intramuscular \& intradermal injections, within the first 5 postoperative days of the trauma
AbobotulinumtoxinA 500 UNT
Anaerobic fermentation of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum produces botulinum toxin. A range of different C. Botulinum strains have been recognized; eight immunologically different serotypes (type A-H) are created and consist of botulinum neurotoxin complexed with a number of related proteins.
Neurotoxin type A preparations are the most widely used for therapeutic application. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products on the market in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA; Botox/Vistabel, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), abobotulinum toxin A (ABO; Dysport/Ipsen Limited, Slough Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO; Xeomin/Bocouture, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). In nature, BoNT-A is synthesized as macromolecular protein complexes
control group
of 6 patients that acted as the control group and received no treatment
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AbobotulinumtoxinA 500 UNT
Anaerobic fermentation of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum produces botulinum toxin. A range of different C. Botulinum strains have been recognized; eight immunologically different serotypes (type A-H) are created and consist of botulinum neurotoxin complexed with a number of related proteins.
Neurotoxin type A preparations are the most widely used for therapeutic application. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products on the market in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA; Botox/Vistabel, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), abobotulinum toxin A (ABO; Dysport/Ipsen Limited, Slough Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO; Xeomin/Bocouture, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). In nature, BoNT-A is synthesized as macromolecular protein complexes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients free from any systemic disease.
* Patients who understand verbal and written instructions
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients suffering from complicated forehead lacerations that require grafting.
* Patients with forehead burns.
* Patients with neuromuscular disorders.
* Patients with previous surgical or non-surgical intervention.
* Patients allergic to drugs used in this study
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Omnia Shetta
researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mahitab M soliman, phd
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Alexandria University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
oral & maxillofacial surgery department ,faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university
Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Oshetta
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.