Second Uterine Evacuation for Low-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia

NCT ID: NCT04756713

Last Updated: 2022-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-11

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of second uterine curettage in patients with low-risk non-metastatic GTN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial including patients seen at one of 13 gestational trophoblastic disease reference centers in Brazil. Subjects are eligible if they have low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia according to FIGO 2000 criteria and the FIGO/WHO prognostic risk score. The study includes two treatment arms: immediate treatment with single-agent chemotherapy (center choice of agent) or second uterine curettage. The primary outcome is the rate of primary remission. Secondary outcomes are the number of chemotherapy cycles required to achieve remission, rate of primary chemotherapy resistance, rate of relapse, and overall survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Molar Pregnancy Gestational Trophoblastic Tumor, Non-Metastatic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Treatment assignments are made by a remote investigator not involved in the clinical care of the patient using a coded key with random block sizes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chemotherapy

Patients allocated to receive conventional chemotherapy will be treated with methotrexate (1 mg/kg intramuscular) with rescue of folinic acid (15mg orally). In cases of chemoresistance, second-line chemotherapy will be performed with actinomycin-D (Act-D) 1.25 mg intravenous pulse every 14 days. The third line of chemotherapy will be the EMA/CO regimen (reserving the EP / EMA regimen (E, cisplatin, MTX / Act-D) for the fourth line.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

conventional chemotherapy will be treated with MTX (1 mg/kg intramuscular) with rescue of FA (15mg orally). In cases of chemoresistance, second-line chemotherapy will be performed with actinomycin-D (Act-D) 1.25 mg intravenous pulse every 14 days. The third line of chemotherapy will be the EMA/CO regimen (, reserving the EP / EMA regimen (E, cisplatin, MTX / Act-D) for the fourth line.

Uterine evacuation

Patients randomized to undergo a second curettage will undergo manual or electronic vacuum aspiration under ultrasound guidance. Following discharge after the second curettage patients will return to weekly hCG monitoring. If hCG levels are decreasing, patients will remain on weekly hCG follow-up until the first normal hCG (\<5 IU/L) is achieved. Then they will have monthly hCG monitoring for 12 months. If patients do not attain remission and develop persistent GTN as established by FIGO 2000, the tumor will be re-staged and appropriate chemotherapy will be initiated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Uterine curettage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Manual or electric vacuum aspiration under ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Uterine curettage

Manual or electric vacuum aspiration under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Chemotherapy

conventional chemotherapy will be treated with MTX (1 mg/kg intramuscular) with rescue of FA (15mg orally). In cases of chemoresistance, second-line chemotherapy will be performed with actinomycin-D (Act-D) 1.25 mg intravenous pulse every 14 days. The third line of chemotherapy will be the EMA/CO regimen (, reserving the EP / EMA regimen (E, cisplatin, MTX / Act-D) for the fourth line.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histopathological diagnosis of molar pegnancy according to the morphological criteria described by Sebire et al., who meet the diagnostic criteria for low-risk non-metastatic GTN according to FIGO 2000 criteria

Exclusion Criteria

1. High risk GTN (FIGO risk score ≥ 7) or metastatic disease at diagnosis of GTN (stage II, III or IV);
2. Histopathological diagnosis of choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic or epithelioid trophoblastic tumor at the second curettage;
3. Previous chemotherapy treatment;
4. Level of hCG at the time of GTN diagnosis less than 20 IU/L (to minimize the risk of inclusion of patients with false positive hCG, either by cross-reaction with pituitary hormones or by the presence of circulating heterophilic antibodies);
5. Relapsed GTN;
6. Incomplete medical records.
7. Loss to follow-up;
8. Voluntary desire to stop participating in the study.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal University of Ceará

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal University of São Paulo UNIFESP

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Campinas State University UNICAMP

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Paulista State University UNESP BOTUCATU

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical School of Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Porto Alegr

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Caxias do Sul

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kevin Elias

Co-investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Braga, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Paulista State University UNESP

Botucatu, , Brazil

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Campinas State University UNICAMP

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Caxias do Sul

Caxias do Sul, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Federal University of Ceará

Ceará, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Medical School of Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Federal University of São Paulo UNIFESP

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

MARCIO BARCELLOS, MD

Role: CONTACT

(21)2556-9747

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Izildinha Maestá

Role: primary

Daniela A Yela

Role: primary

José Mauro Madi

Role: primary

Cecília Maria Ponte

Role: primary

Elza -Maria Hartmann

Role: primary

Marcio Barcellos, MD

Role: primary

Antonio Braga, MD

Role: backup

Sue Yazaki Sun

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Osborne RJ, Filiaci VL, Schink JC, Mannel RS, Behbakht K, Hoffman JS, Spirtos NM, Chan JK, Tidy JA, Miller DS. Second Curettage for Low-Risk Nonmetastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):535-542. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001554.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27500329 (View on PubMed)

Hemida R, Vos EL, El-Deek B, Arafa M, Toson E, Burger CW, van Doorn HC. Second Uterine Curettage and the Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):1024-1031. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003232.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30969220 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ReCure

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.