Role of MRI Assessment in Fertility Sparing Treatment for Cervical Cancer at Staging and Follow-up and for Identification of Risk Factors for Aggressive Disease.
NCT ID: NCT06877065
Last Updated: 2025-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-03-01
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fertility-sparing in Early-stage Cervcial Cancer: The ETERNITY Project
NCT06351228
Prospective Study of Fertility-sparing Treatment Strategy in Patients With Early Cervical Cancer(SYSUGO-005/CSEM009)
NCT02624531
MRI-based Signatures for Survival Prediction in Cervical Cancer With Radiotherapy
NCT06197126
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Staging of Cervix Cancer
NCT00193934
Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Immunohistochemical Markers in Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix
NCT06852157
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In women with early-stage cervical cancer (ECC), fertility-sparing surgery techniques include laparoscopic, abdominal or vaginal radical trachelectomy (RT) and cold knife conization (CKC) with or without pelvic lymph nodes dissection. Currently, RT is proposed as fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), alternative to radical hysterectomy, in patients with ECC staged IA1-IB1, as by the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. According to a recent metanalysis, RT and CKC present similar oncologic outcomes in terms of recurrence rates but CKC presents better obstetrical outcomes in terms of pregnancy rate (36% for CKC vs. 20% for RT) . NCCN suggested RT as an alternative to radical hysterectomy (RH) in young women desiring to preserve fertility with: disease limited to cervix, tumor size \< 2 cm (or \< 2.5 cm if exophytic lesion), absence of parametrial extension, an estimated distance of ≥ 1 cm from the proximal aspect of the tumor to the internal os, absence of lymphadenopathies or metastatic disease. Some authors have proposed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CKC as a safe and effective approach in ECC FIGO stage IB2.
In 2018 FIGO staging was revised allowing the use of any of the imaging modalities (i.e.
ultrasound, CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET)), to provide information on tumor size, nodal status, and local or systemic spread. MRI is reported to be very accurate in selecting patients eligible for FSS, in tumor size evaluation and deep stromal invasion assessment. In the evaluation of parametrial invasion, the specificity and negative predictive value of MRI were 97% and 100%, respectively.
Furthermore, MRI has demonstrated very high sensitivity and specificity in assessment of internal os involvement, 90% and 98% respectively. Moreover, MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) assumes an important role in the evaluation of tumor response after chemotherapy. In addition, MRI is highly sensitive and accurate (90.7% and 91.7% respectively) in tumor size evaluation after FSS, especially in patients who have undergone cone biopsy before MRI examination.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of MRI, including DWI, in the staging and evaluation of response to fertility sparing treatment, including both primary surgery (RT or CKC) or after NACT, followed by CKC, in patients with ECC (FIGO 2018 stage IB1- IIA1), desiring to preserve their fertility.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective cohort
In the retrospective phase of the research, all patients with histological diagnosis of cervical cancer, stage FIGO up to IB2-IIA1 (T size \< 4 cm), treated with fertility sparing techniques, from 2018 to 2023, will be identified retrospectively, searching on RedCap database. Of these patients, only those with good quality of MR images (available on digital support) will be selected.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective cohort
In the prospective phase of the research, all patients with histological diagnosis of cervical cancer, FIGO stage up to IB2-IIA1 (T size \< 4 cm), that wish to preserve fertility and are suitable for fertility sparing treatments. Of these patients, only those with good quality of MR images (available on digital support) will be selected.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* absence of nodal disease,
* no menopausal status
* wish to preserve fertility
* refusal of radical treatment.
* Patients who had a pre-treatment and post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging.
* Availability of digital MR images and histopathological samples.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neuroendocrine cervical tumours or other rare histology, such as glassy cells or clear cell carcinoma non-HPV related adenocarcinoma.
* ongoing pregnancy at the time of diagnosis.
* Patients without available MR images on digital media or with low quality images.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benedetta Gui
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Advanced Radiology Center- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6280
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.