COPD and Socially Vulnerable Individuals

NCT ID: NCT04754308

Last Updated: 2024-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

513 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-19

Study Completion Date

2024-04-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The trial investigates and describes the prevalence of COPD in patients who are in the social nurses' target group and investigates the effect of opportunistic screening for COPD in these vulnerable patients.

The study population is patients who have been referred to a social nurse at hospitals in the Capital Region, Central Denmark Region and Region Zealand of Denmark during the inclusion period, and monitor them for up to 5 years in order to investigate variables that are significant in terms of the patients' treatment, hospitalisations, and mortality in relation to COPD.

Our hypothesis is that there will be a higher incidence of COPD among those patients with whom the social nurses have contact than in the general population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study consists of two sub-studies: A a descriptive cross-sectional study "The prevalence of COPD in patients who are in the social nurses' target group" followed by study B a cohort study "The effect of opportunistic screening for COPD in patients who are in the social nurses' target group", based on a closed cohort.

People in the lower social classes are at increased risk of developing COPD due to their lifelong accumulation of risk factors, such as smoking, passive smoking and the influence of lifestyle and the environment.

In the group with the socially vulnerable individuals, 70% are smokers compared to 18% in the general Danish population. The socially vulnerable individuals are defined here as people affected by homelessness, drug abuse, harmful alcohol consumption, mental illness and poverty. Despite the socially vulnerable group having an over-consumption of general practice visits, 25% of the patients in the social nurses' target group state that they do not have contact with or use their own doctor.

Our hypothesis is therefore that there will be a higher incidence of COPD among those patients with whom the social nurses have contact than in the general population.

Purpose: To investigate and describe the prevalence of COPD in patients who are in the social nurses' target group and to investigate the effect of opportunistic screening for COPD in these vulnerable citizens.

Data collection:

Baseline data from the cross-sectional study are derived from lung function measurement and REDCap online-questionnaires completed on inclusion.

The data from the cohort study regarding disease burden and hospital visits originates from the national patient registry (LPR) and mortality data is retrieved from the Danish Register of Causes of Death. Data regarding redeemed prescriptions for COPD medicine originates from the Prescription Database. The patients' connection to the job market and income status are based on extracts from RAS (Registry-based Labour Force Statistics), which is administered by Statistics Denmark. Data regarding the highest acquired education (HFAUDD) is from Statistics Denmark.

Variables:

There will be collected the following variables at inclusion: information on demographics, lung function, selv-reported information on: risk factors, socioeconomic variables and symptoms of lung disease. Moreover register data on socioeconomic status, morbidity, physical health by Charlson score, mortality, hospital visits and prescriptions for COPD Medicine will be retrieved after 5 years follow-up.

Sample size:

To detect a difference between the patient group and the Danish population of minimum 100% a total of 511 participants are needed in the study (power of 80%, p-values=0,05, an estimated COPD prevalence of 4,3% in the Danish population).

The collected data will be kept in accordance to the Data Protection Agency guidelines. The studies are carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients referred to social nurse

After obtaining informed consent, the social nurse reviews the online-questionnaire with the patient and performs a lung function examination requiring the patient to blow into a plastic tube. If a patient is identified as having obstructive reduction of lung function, they are offered a referral to a local pulmonary medicine department or GP for further investigation - regardless of whether or not they have a diagnosed or undiagnosed lung disease.

In addition, participants are questioned about their motivation for smoking cessation and are informed of the options for this (in hospital and/or referral to the municipality).

Group Type OTHER

Spirometry

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The method of examination, Spirometry, is non-invasive (i.e. not an intervention that involves penetration into the body by means of incisions or injections.). It is a routine examination and there are no risks, adverse reactions, or discomforts associated with the examination.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spirometry

The method of examination, Spirometry, is non-invasive (i.e. not an intervention that involves penetration into the body by means of incisions or injections.). It is a routine examination and there are no risks, adverse reactions, or discomforts associated with the examination.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Able to speak and understand Danish to such an extent that informed consent can be obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Not having a Danish civil registration number, since foreign patients do not have free access to examinations and medical treatment, and cannot be followed up in the national patient registry
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hvidovre University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Charlotte Suppli Ulrik

Professor, consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nina Brünés

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Patientforloeb

Charlotte Ulrik

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Medical Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Århus Universitetshospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Horsens

Horsens, , Denmark

Site Status

Hvidovre Hospital

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status

Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge og Roskilde

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Nykøbing Falster Sygehus

Nykøbing Falster, , Denmark

Site Status

Bornholm Hospital

Rønne, , Denmark

Site Status

Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospital

Slagelse, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brunes N, Lindstroem MB, Ulrik CS, Andersen O, Lisby M, Godtfredsen NS, Hansen TL, Pisinger C, Graven V, Marsaa K, Thomsen LH. Opportunistic screening for COPD among socially marginalized patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02927-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38443835 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-20031386

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

COPD Online Rehabilitation (CORe)
NCT02667171 COMPLETED NA