Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
513 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-19
2024-04-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study population is patients who have been referred to a social nurse at hospitals in the Capital Region, Central Denmark Region and Region Zealand of Denmark during the inclusion period, and monitor them for up to 5 years in order to investigate variables that are significant in terms of the patients' treatment, hospitalisations, and mortality in relation to COPD.
Our hypothesis is that there will be a higher incidence of COPD among those patients with whom the social nurses have contact than in the general population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
COPD at a Street Level
NCT05660460
COPD Rehabilitation in Primary and Secondary Health Care
NCT00320333
Is a Collective Person-centered Dialogue Intervention for Hospitalised COPD Patients Feasible?
NCT06242301
Characteristics of People With Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - A Multicenter Study
NCT04249388
Digital Follow-up Program for People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Healthcare
NCT06401512
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
People in the lower social classes are at increased risk of developing COPD due to their lifelong accumulation of risk factors, such as smoking, passive smoking and the influence of lifestyle and the environment.
In the group with the socially vulnerable individuals, 70% are smokers compared to 18% in the general Danish population. The socially vulnerable individuals are defined here as people affected by homelessness, drug abuse, harmful alcohol consumption, mental illness and poverty. Despite the socially vulnerable group having an over-consumption of general practice visits, 25% of the patients in the social nurses' target group state that they do not have contact with or use their own doctor.
Our hypothesis is therefore that there will be a higher incidence of COPD among those patients with whom the social nurses have contact than in the general population.
Purpose: To investigate and describe the prevalence of COPD in patients who are in the social nurses' target group and to investigate the effect of opportunistic screening for COPD in these vulnerable citizens.
Data collection:
Baseline data from the cross-sectional study are derived from lung function measurement and REDCap online-questionnaires completed on inclusion.
The data from the cohort study regarding disease burden and hospital visits originates from the national patient registry (LPR) and mortality data is retrieved from the Danish Register of Causes of Death. Data regarding redeemed prescriptions for COPD medicine originates from the Prescription Database. The patients' connection to the job market and income status are based on extracts from RAS (Registry-based Labour Force Statistics), which is administered by Statistics Denmark. Data regarding the highest acquired education (HFAUDD) is from Statistics Denmark.
Variables:
There will be collected the following variables at inclusion: information on demographics, lung function, selv-reported information on: risk factors, socioeconomic variables and symptoms of lung disease. Moreover register data on socioeconomic status, morbidity, physical health by Charlson score, mortality, hospital visits and prescriptions for COPD Medicine will be retrieved after 5 years follow-up.
Sample size:
To detect a difference between the patient group and the Danish population of minimum 100% a total of 511 participants are needed in the study (power of 80%, p-values=0,05, an estimated COPD prevalence of 4,3% in the Danish population).
The collected data will be kept in accordance to the Data Protection Agency guidelines. The studies are carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients referred to social nurse
After obtaining informed consent, the social nurse reviews the online-questionnaire with the patient and performs a lung function examination requiring the patient to blow into a plastic tube. If a patient is identified as having obstructive reduction of lung function, they are offered a referral to a local pulmonary medicine department or GP for further investigation - regardless of whether or not they have a diagnosed or undiagnosed lung disease.
In addition, participants are questioned about their motivation for smoking cessation and are informed of the options for this (in hospital and/or referral to the municipality).
Spirometry
The method of examination, Spirometry, is non-invasive (i.e. not an intervention that involves penetration into the body by means of incisions or injections.). It is a routine examination and there are no risks, adverse reactions, or discomforts associated with the examination.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spirometry
The method of examination, Spirometry, is non-invasive (i.e. not an intervention that involves penetration into the body by means of incisions or injections.). It is a routine examination and there are no risks, adverse reactions, or discomforts associated with the examination.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to speak and understand Danish to such an extent that informed consent can be obtained
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
OTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
Professor, consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nina Brünés
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Patientforloeb
Charlotte Ulrik
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Medical Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Århus Universitetshospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Regionshospitalet Horsens
Horsens, , Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge og Roskilde
Køge, , Denmark
Nykøbing Falster Sygehus
Nykøbing Falster, , Denmark
Bornholm Hospital
Rønne, , Denmark
Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospital
Slagelse, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brunes N, Lindstroem MB, Ulrik CS, Andersen O, Lisby M, Godtfredsen NS, Hansen TL, Pisinger C, Graven V, Marsaa K, Thomsen LH. Opportunistic screening for COPD among socially marginalized patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02927-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-20031386
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.