Safety and Efficacy of an Ab Interno Gelatin Stent (XEN63) With or Without Mitomycin C
NCT ID: NCT04750447
Last Updated: 2022-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-09
2023-06-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Effectiveness of Gel Stent (XEN63) Implantation Using Ab Interno and Ab Externo Approaches in Adult Participants With Glaucoma
NCT06822738
A Prospective, Single Surgeon, Randomized Control Study Comparing ab Interno XEN Gel Microstent Implantation vs Closed Conjunctiva ab Externo Implantation Performed at the Slit Lamp for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Glaucoma
NCT04943185
An Innovation in Glaucoma Surgery: XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation
NCT03138928
Analysis of Conjunctival Changes as Indicators for Ab-interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation Surgery Outcomes
NCT04727411
Evaluation of the XEN Implant in Moderate Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) Participants
NCT02006693
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open Angle Glaucoma
Patients aged 30-90 Primary open angle glaucoma on maximum tolerated medical therapy Going to receive XEN63 ab interno gelatin stent with or without MMC in study eye ± cataract surgery
XEN 63
The Xen gelatin microstent (Allergan, CA, USA) is a 6mm gelatin tube used in microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) to create a bleb. A bleb is a fluid filled blister located in the tissue covering the white portion of the eye (the conjunctiva) created after glaucoma surgery. The bleb allows the eye pressure (intraocular pressure - IOP) to be lowered by bypassing the natural pathways by which the fluid called aqueous leaves the eye and redirecting it towards the bleb to be absorbed by other pathways. Amongst the main advantages of this device is the ability to create a bleb without disrupting tissue unlike other methods of glaucoma surgery (e.g., trabeculectomy). This decreases the amount of wound healing and scarring, and potentially limiting bleb failure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
XEN 63
The Xen gelatin microstent (Allergan, CA, USA) is a 6mm gelatin tube used in microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) to create a bleb. A bleb is a fluid filled blister located in the tissue covering the white portion of the eye (the conjunctiva) created after glaucoma surgery. The bleb allows the eye pressure (intraocular pressure - IOP) to be lowered by bypassing the natural pathways by which the fluid called aqueous leaves the eye and redirecting it towards the bleb to be absorbed by other pathways. Amongst the main advantages of this device is the ability to create a bleb without disrupting tissue unlike other methods of glaucoma surgery (e.g., trabeculectomy). This decreases the amount of wound healing and scarring, and potentially limiting bleb failure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous glaucoma shunt/valve in the target quadrant of study eye
* Presence of conjunctival scarring, prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant of study eye
* Active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis), active iris neovascularization or neovascularization of the iris within six months of the surgical date
* Presence of anterior chamber intraocular lens, intraocular silicone oil, vitreous present in the anterior chamber, impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g., Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos or other evidence of elevated venous pressure)
* Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde), history of dermatologic keloid formation.
* Prior CPC, corneal graft (PKP, DALK, DSAEK, DMEK)
* Other forms of combined surgery (cornea, retina) besides cataract surgery
30 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Allergan
INDUSTRY
Prism Eye Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Iqbal Ahmed
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Iqbal Ahmed, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prism Eye Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prism Eye Institute
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Conlon R, Saheb H, Ahmed II. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;52(1):114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Green W, Lind JT, Sheybani A. Review of the Xen Gel Stent and InnFocus MicroShunt. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;29(2):162-170. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000462.
Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, Somers A, Lenzhofer M, Stalmans I, Reitsamer H, Hengerer FH, Ahmed IIK. Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1579-1588. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1035
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.