Retrospective Review of Xen Gel Stent Implantation With Open vs. Closed Conjunctiva Approach
NCT ID: NCT04406467
Last Updated: 2023-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
137 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-19
2020-08-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Longitudinal Study on Glaucoma Surgery Using XEN® Gel Stent
NCT03151577
Analysis of Conjunctival Changes as Indicators for Ab-interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation Surgery Outcomes
NCT04727411
Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma
NCT03904381
Evaluation of the XEN Implant in Moderate Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) Participants
NCT02006693
XEN Glaucoma Gel Stent Versus Trabeculectomy
NCT05439161
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Success rates will be determined based on need for re-intervention and intraocular pressure control.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xen Gel Stent
Ab-interno or Ab-Externa Xen with closed or open conjunctiva.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New York University
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Univeristy
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Panarelli JF, Yan DB, Francis B, Craven ER. XEN Gel Stent Open Conjunctiva Technique: A Practical Approach Paper. Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2538-2549. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01278-1. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
Do A, McGlumphy E, Shukla A, Dangda S, Schuman JS, Boland MV, Yohannan J, Panarelli JF, Craven ER. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Open Versus Closed Conjunctiva Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021 Jul-Aug;4(4):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
133133
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00201210
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.