A Study Using Brain Stimulation and Behavioral Therapy to Increase Extent of Resection in Low-Grade Gliomas

NCT ID: NCT04745156

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-08-01

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study uses a cranial implant to deliver cortical stimulation that, when paired with physiotherapy, will remap the brain so that critical brain functions can be protected during brain tumor surgery. This pilot study will provide initial evidence for the safety and feasibility of such a protocol which will lead to future pivotal trials that could radically change eloquent area brain surgery. For patients with otherwise incompletely resectable brain tumors, this could mean a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Protocol: Participants will undergo a standard-of-care craniotomy for resection of low-grade glioma. If part of the lesion cannot be removed due to involvement of functional cortex, RNS (Responsive Neurostimulation System \[RNS; NeuroPace, Inc.\]) electrodes will be implanted over the tumor-invaded area(s) in five participants. Stimulation will then be optimized for each individual to disrupt the function of the invaded cortical node (e.g., hand motor area -\> hand dysfunction) (Aim 1). Over the next two months, outpatient physiotherapy will work to overcome the stim-induced deficits through gradual increases in stimulation amplitude as other, non-stimulated brain regions begin to assume its function (Aim 2). Once complete, participants will return to the OR for device explantation, repeated intraoperative mapping, and extended resection (if safe) (Aim 3).

Aim 1: Optimize stimulation to maximize stim-induced deficits and minimize side effects Rationale: To induce plasticity, stimulation parameters must be individually tuned to maximize effect and minimize side effects. Approach: After device implantation and prior to hospital discharge, stimulus settings (frequency, pulse-width, and amplitude) will be optimized to the relevant clinical response while minimizing adverse effects (e.g., focal tonus, myoclonus, or seizures) while still in the safe, inpatient setting. Outcomes: Primary Endpoints: 1) stim-induced focal clinical deficit as measured on the relevant clinical scale (e.g., manual motor score \[0-5\], picture naming \[x/10\]), repetition \[x/3\]); 2) stim-induced side effects (e.g., seizures).

Aim 2: Evaluate extent of remapping and safety of outpatient stimulation-physiotherapy protocol. Rationale: The ability to deliver chronic, outpatient stimulation is vital for practical clinical translation, yet neither its safety nor efficacy has been demonstrated. Approach: After Aim 1, a physiotherapist will assign a personalized, outpatient therapy regimen aimed at overcoming stim-induced deficits. Participants will have daily virtual sessions and return to clinic 2x/week for amplitude increases to re-induce deficits that therapy has overcome. This will continue until stimulation no longer can induce a deficit, suggesting successful functional remapping and enabling a return to the OR for further resection. Outcomes: Primary Endpoints: 1) absence of stim-related ER visits, readmissions, or serious adverse events (safety), 2) changes in intraop stimulation maps from surgery 1 to surgery 2 (induced remapping).

Aim 3: Evaluate ability to extend surgical resections and associated neurological outcomes. Rationale: Any change in functional boundaries will only be useful if it results in a safe, extended resection. Approach: Each surgery will proceed with standard-of-care intraoperative functional mapping techniques and decision making. Neurological examinations will be performed preoperatively, daily while inpatient, then again at 2-weeks and 3-months postoperatively. Extent of resection will be evaluated as 3D residual tumor volume on postoperative MRI. Outcomes: Primary Endpoint: 1) Change in residual tumor volume after second versus first resection, 2) new neurological deficits 3-months after second resection compared to before second resection. Secondary Endpoint: 1) New, temporary neurological deficits after the second surgery

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glioma Glioma Intracranial Gliomas Benign Brain Tumor Brain Cancer Motor Cortex; Lesion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RNS System Implantation

This is a device feasibility study, therefore participants will only be enrolled into the investigational arm and will receive the RNS System Implantation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RNS System Implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Following resection consistent with SoC, if there is evidence of residual tumor which cannot be resected due to invasion of hand-M1 but which is small enough to be covered by two four-electrode strips, these strips will be placed on the functional cortex of interest and secured to the dura. The location of the leads will be registered into the navigation software (either Medtronic Stealth or Brainlab). The dura will then be closed as watertight as possible, and the RNS System will be incorporated into the craniotomy on closure Prior to closure, four bone screws will be placed and registered to the intraoperative navigation system as internal fiducials to be retrieved for future procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RNS System Implantation

Following resection consistent with SoC, if there is evidence of residual tumor which cannot be resected due to invasion of hand-M1 but which is small enough to be covered by two four-electrode strips, these strips will be placed on the functional cortex of interest and secured to the dura. The location of the leads will be registered into the navigation software (either Medtronic Stealth or Brainlab). The dura will then be closed as watertight as possible, and the RNS System will be incorporated into the craniotomy on closure Prior to closure, four bone screws will be placed and registered to the intraoperative navigation system as internal fiducials to be retrieved for future procedures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-65 years old
2. Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
3. Radiographic evidence of likely low-grade glioma on MRI (i.e. non-enhancing) invading primary motor cortex in the non-dominant hemisphere.
4. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 75
5. Normal or near normal motor strength (i.e., at least 3/5 in relevant areas)
6. Normal or near normal speech (Can consistently name at least 4/5 cards)
7. No medical contraindication to surgery
8. Free of other illness that may shorten life expectancy

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of other malignancy not in remission
2. Evidence of bi-hemispheric or widespread tumor involvement
3. Likely candidate to receive GTR on initial resection
4. Medically high-risk surgical candidate
5. History of recent scalp or systemic infection
6. Presence of other implants or foreign bodies in the head
7. Inability to receive an MRI for any reason
8. Inability to receive cortical stimulation for any reason
9. Coagulation disorders and/or use of anti-thrombotic therapies
10. Platelet count \< 50
11. Diathermy procedures
12. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
13. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
14. Presence of implanted cardiac device (such as a pacemaker or defibrillator)
15. Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Max Krucoff, MD

Assistant Professor of Neurological Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Max Krucoff, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Wisconsin

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sarah Cornell

Role: CONTACT

414-955-0989

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO00039766

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MEP and Neuromuscular Blocker
NCT04768400 COMPLETED NA
Coping With High Grade Glioma
NCT00815152 TERMINATED NA
Mind-Body Intervention in Glioma Couples
NCT03244995 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA