Intervention of a Game About Radiotherapy for Children With Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04728555

Last Updated: 2023-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) can be stressful and challenging for children exposed to a highly technical environment with large radiation equipment and immobilization devices. A pedagogical digital game about RT has been developed. Children who have received RT participated in work-shops and contributed with their experiences and suggestions.

Aim: To explore whether the intervention with a pedagogical digital game facilitate understanding, choice of distraction, creation of a sense of calmness and self-efficacy prior to and during RT and to describe the children's and the parents experiences and use of the game as a pedagogical tool. Further, to investigate feasibility in terms of reach, usability and acceptability.

Method: A feasibility and prospective waiting list control design is planned by recruiting 60 children (5-14 years) and their parents, for randomization into two groups. The first group will receive the game five days before start of RT. All children will have standard information one day before RT. The second group will have access to the game three days after start of treatment. The effects of the game will be investigated before and during RT and between groups as they receive the game at different time. Children will answer questionnaires about self-assessed anxiety, understanding of the procedure, distraction strategies, self-efficacy to remain motionless. Statistical comparative and correlational analyses will be calculated. Interviews will be performed with 12 children and 24 parents. Changes and further development of the game will be implemented based on the results of the responses.

Significance: The game can support children to undergo RT and be used nationally to prepare for RT. Thus all children receive similar information regardless of where they live, and contribute to increased knowledge, autonomy, reduce fear and anxiety. In the long term, the use of anesthesia could decrease for children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Data Collection and procedure:

Access to the game for children randomized to the first group: Four to six days before start of treatment.

Questionnaires to all children: Questions about state and trait anxiety, and radiotherapy before the information meeting with the oncology nurse, one day before the start of treatment, at baseline.

Questionnaire to parents: Questions about state and trait anxiety before the information meeting with the oncology nurse at baseline.

Information meeting with all children and their parents: Information about radiotherapy by oncology nurse at baseline Questionnaires to all children: Questions about state anxiety and radiotherapy on treatment day one and three.

Access to the game for children randomized to the second group: Day three after start of treatment.

Questionnaire to all children: Questions about state anxiety on treatment day six and 15.

Questionnaire to all children: Questions about the digital game one week after access to the game.

Game logs: Collection of game logs one week after the intervention.

Interview of 12 children and 24 parents: Within four weeks after end of treatment.

Power: A power of 0.80, an alpha value of 0.05 and a size-effect of 0.5 provided an estimation of 26 participants in each group. Thirty participants are planned in case of dropouts.

Data analysis: Comparative and correlational statistical analyses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety State

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A non-blinded randomized waiting list control study
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Non-blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Game before RT start

Intervention of a digital game five days before start of RadioTherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Game about radiotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A digital pedagogical game about radiotherapy

Game after RT start

Intervention of a digital game three days after start of RadioTherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Game about radiotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A digital pedagogical game about radiotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Game about radiotherapy

A digital pedagogical game about radiotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Children aged 5-14 years old who are going to have radiotherapy at the Skandion Clinic, Uppsala with or without sedation/anesthesia, understand and can speak Swedish and have access to a computer.

Exclusion Criteria

Severe cognitive impairment and too seriously ill to be able to answer questions.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uppsala University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gunn Engvall

Ass. Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gunn Engvall, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Women's and Children's Health

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cederved C, Back J, Angstrom-Brannstrom C, Ljungman G, Engvall G. Co-creation of a Serious Game About Radiotherapy: Participatory Action Research Study With Children Treated for Cancer. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 31;9(2):e34476. doi: 10.2196/34476.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35639467 (View on PubMed)

Cederved C, Angstrom-Brannstrom C, Ljungman G, Engvall G. Parents' experiences of having their children take part in participatory action research creating a serious game about radiotherapy. Radiography (Lond). 2023 Jan;29(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36327521 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Children's RT Game 21-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.