Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-26
2022-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation Procedures for the Treatment of Small Saphenous Varicose Veins
NCT06711120
Microwave Venous Ablation in Comparison to Radiofrequency Ablation, Laser Ablation and Surgical Ligation in Management of Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence
NCT04479956
Safety and Efficacy Study of Endovenous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Varicose Veins
NCT04645771
Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Closure System in the Treatment of Varicose Veins
NCT04671641
Endovenous Laser Ablation in Acute Thrombophlebitis of the Varicose Great Saphenous Vein
NCT05001776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
treatment group
Microwave Ablation Therapeutic Apparatus. Patients with primary lower extremity varicose veins were treated with endovenous microwave therapy using Microwave Ablation Therapy Apparatus. Ultrasound examination and questionnaire survey(AVVQ and VCSS) were performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months,12 months after treatment,drug use and adverse events were recorded to assess complications and target lesion closure rate.
Microwave Ablation Therapeutic Apparatus
The selected and qualified subjects with primary lower extremity varicose veins were randomly treated with microwave ablation equipment or laser treatment equipment. Subjects in the two groups were returned to the hospital for follow-up at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, respectively, for ultrasound examination and questionnaire evaluation, medication status and adverse events were recorded, and target lesion closure rate and subject satisfaction were evaluated.
control group
Semiconductor Laser Treatment Apparatus. Patients with primary lower extremity varicose veins were treated with endovenous laser treatment using Semiconductor Laser Treatment Apparatus. Ultrasound examination and questionnaire survey(AVVQ and VCSS) were performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment,drug use and adverse events were recorded to assess complications and target lesion closure rate.
Microwave Ablation Therapeutic Apparatus
The selected and qualified subjects with primary lower extremity varicose veins were randomly treated with microwave ablation equipment or laser treatment equipment. Subjects in the two groups were returned to the hospital for follow-up at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, respectively, for ultrasound examination and questionnaire evaluation, medication status and adverse events were recorded, and target lesion closure rate and subject satisfaction were evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Microwave Ablation Therapeutic Apparatus
The selected and qualified subjects with primary lower extremity varicose veins were randomly treated with microwave ablation equipment or laser treatment equipment. Subjects in the two groups were returned to the hospital for follow-up at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, respectively, for ultrasound examination and questionnaire evaluation, medication status and adverse events were recorded, and target lesion closure rate and subject satisfaction were evaluated.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients clinically diagnosed as primary great saphenous vein insufficiency with reflux lasting \> 0.5 seconds on duplex ultrasound
3. Patients with CEAP grade C2-C6
4. Patients who voluntarily participate in this trial, understand all the risks and benefits described in the informed consent document, and sign the written informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with previous surgical treatment on the target lesion or patients with acute thrombosis
3. Patients with deep vein thrombosis and superficial vein thrombosis
4. Patients with acute systemic infectious diseases
5. Patients with severe liver and kidney dysfunction (ALT \> 3 times the upper limit of normal value; creatinine \> 225 umol /L)
6. Patients with known uncorrectable bleeding or severe coagulopathy
7. Patients with anesthesia contraindications
8. Patients with poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg) and diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose ≥ 10.0 mmol / L)
9. Patients with non-primary varicose veins caused by post-deep vein thrombosis syndrome, KT syndrome (Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome), arteriovenous fistula, etc.
10. Patients with other diseases that may cause difficulty in conducting the trial or evaluation, such as mental illness, AIDS, malignant tumors, liver disease, cardiac insufficiency, etc. or patients whose life expectancy is less than 1 year
11. Pregnant, lactating women, or those planning on becoming pregnant during the trial
12. Patients who have participated in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices in the past 3 months
13. Patients considered unsuitable for inclusion by investigators for other reasons
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
weiwei Wu, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hosipital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Li Y, Wu W, Li Y, Li J, Sun M. Efficacy and safety of endovenous microwave ablation versus laser ablation for great saphenous vein varicosis: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e059213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059213.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SD-LC-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.