Technology-Assisted Systems Change for Suicide Prevention
NCT ID: NCT04720911
Last Updated: 2024-10-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
47 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Telehealth to Improve Prevention of Suicide (TIPS)
NCT04800029
Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinician Decision Support System to Prevent Suicidal Behaviors
NCT05671133
Promoting Safety Plan and Coping Strategy Use Among Adults With Suicidal Thoughts
NCT05791643
Real-time Intervention for Suicide Risk Reduction
NCT03950765
Just-in-time Interventions for Reducing Short-term Suicide Risk
NCT05793541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1 will use persona development, an innovative human computer interaction approach, to ensure the TASCS is intimately informed by end users.
Aim 2 will optimize the TASCS in a small field test in the ED.
Aim 3, modeled after a Hybrid Type 2 effectiveness-implementation design, will gather data on usability, acceptability, and implementation of the TASCS ED App using a randomized experiment (n=45) of three modalities: (1) On site (n=15), (2) Telehealth (n=15), and (3) Self-administered (n=15). For 3 months post-discharge, all participants will receive coaching calls, facilitated by the Post-ED Clinician App, and will have access to the Post-ED Patient and Family App. The intervention is intended to decrease suicidal ideation and behavior by improving perceived social support, increasing behavioral activation, and improving suicide-related impulse control.
Building a comprehensive suite of integrated enabling technologies to address ED-SAFE translation barriers will not only improve ED-SAFE intervention adoption, it will provide a road map for how to do the same for other suicide interventions, both existing and those yet to be developed, maximizing impact on the field.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In-person TASCS
This intervention is designed to assess the TASCS app administered via an in-person clinician in the ED, with follow-up telephone calls by a clinician
In-person TASCS
In-person clinician delivery of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, connection to best-match behavioral health resources, and development of an outpatient treatment plan by a research clinician, facilitated by the TASCS Clinician App.
Follow-up care
Counseling calls and access to the Post-ED Patient and Family App for three months after the index presentation. These resources allow the patient and family to review their safety plan, life plan, and outpatient care plan
Telehealth TASCS
This comparison condition is designed to assess the telehealth modality of TASCS in the ED (in contrast to in-person clinician modality), with follow-up telephone calls by a clinician
Telehealth TASCS
Telehealth clinician delivery of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, connection to best-match behavioral health resources, and development of an outpatient treatment plan by a research clinician, facilitated by the TASCS Clinician App.
Follow-up care
Counseling calls and access to the Post-ED Patient and Family App for three months after the index presentation. These resources allow the patient and family to review their safety plan, life plan, and outpatient care plan
Self-administered TASCS
This comparison condition is designed to assess the self-administered modality of TASCS (in contrast to clinician modality), with follow-up telephone calls by a clinician
Self-administered TASCS
Self-administration of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, facilitated by the TASCS ED Patient App.
Follow-up care
Counseling calls and access to the Post-ED Patient and Family App for three months after the index presentation. These resources allow the patient and family to review their safety plan, life plan, and outpatient care plan
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
In-person TASCS
In-person clinician delivery of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, connection to best-match behavioral health resources, and development of an outpatient treatment plan by a research clinician, facilitated by the TASCS Clinician App.
Telehealth TASCS
Telehealth clinician delivery of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, connection to best-match behavioral health resources, and development of an outpatient treatment plan by a research clinician, facilitated by the TASCS Clinician App.
Self-administered TASCS
Self-administration of the intervention, including the Safety Planning Intervention, facilitated by the TASCS ED Patient App.
Follow-up care
Counseling calls and access to the Post-ED Patient and Family App for three months after the index presentation. These resources allow the patient and family to review their safety plan, life plan, and outpatient care plan
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presenting to selected emergency departments during the study period
* Screened positive for active suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks or attempt in the past 6 months
* Has a smartphone and access to the internet
Exclusion Criteria
* \<18 years of age
* Prisoner.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
OTHER
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Celine Larkin
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Celine Larkin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMass Chan Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Larkin C, Tulu B, Djamasbi S, Garner R, Varzgani F, Siddique M, Pietro J, Boudreaux ED. Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 24;10:e49783. doi: 10.2196/49783.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H00020238
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.