Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-07
2023-01-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Tolerance and Safety of Early Enteral Nutrition in Children After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement
NCT02777541
Using Lignocaine Spray and Gel to Reduce the Pain Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children
NCT01075789
Feeding Children Nasogastrically Versus Nasojejunally While Receiving Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
NCT01301352
Effect of Blenderized Enteral Tube Feeds on Pediatric Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Physiology
NCT04900597
TubeClear® Evaluation in Pediatric Patients (Phase I)
NCT02724631
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective is to determine the safety of the CO2 insufflation during PEG. The secondary objective of this study is to investigate the inhibitory effect of CO2 insufflation on bowel distension.
This is an investigator initiated multicentre, randomized, double blind study to evaluate the safety and adverse events profile of CO2 insufflation during PEG procedure. The study included a screening, pre-intervention (pre-PEG) and a post-intervention time (after-PEG), with total of 4 measurements of waist circumference, two measurements of i-stat.
Children aged 0-19 years, who were admitted for PEG procedure and who meet all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria listed below. A total of 120 children after PEG insertion will be included and divided in two groups: one step group and standard pull group of children; two established groups will be randomized 1:1.
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female patients
* Age between 0 - 19 years
* Written informed consent Exclusion criteria
* Absolute contraindication for PEG procedure
* Patients with hypercapnia (pCO2 \> 50 mmHg at first i-stat measurement)
* Language barriers which do not allow to give informed consent Patient data will be collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), underlining disease, duration of procedure, type of procedure, type of the scope, type of sedation or anaesthesia, complications.
Due to study protocol capillary blood will be withdrawn twice. To conclude there are actually no additional risks for included children due to the study protocol. Moreover, we will be able to diagnose early the important pneumoperitoneum, if it will occur and start to treat it with effective pain killers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* pull technique PEG group divided to co2 or air insufflation group during endoscopy
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single steep arm- CO2 insufflation
PEG will be performed by single step technique and CO2 will be insufflated during the endoscopy
CO2
to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG
Single steep arm- air insufflation
PEG will be performed by single step technique and air will be insufflated during the endoscopy
air
to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG
Pull technique arm- CO2 insufflation
PEG will be performed by pull technique and CO2 will be insufflated during the endoscopy
CO2
to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG
Pull technique arm- air insufflation
PEG will be performed by pull technique and air will be insufflated during the endoscopy
air
to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CO2
to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG
air
to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 0 - 19 years
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with hypercapnia (pCO2 \> 50 mmHg at first i-stat measurement)
* Language barriers which do not allow to give informed consent
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
OTHER
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tadej Battelino
Professor of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matjaz Homan, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital in Ljubljana
Mike Thomson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Paediatric Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
Brussels, , Belgium
Children's Hospital Zagreb
Zagreb, , Croatia
Policlinico Universitario Messina
Messina, , Italy
University Children's Hospital
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
University Children's Hospital Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital
Dubai, , United Arab Emirates
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980 Dec;15(6):872-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80296-x.
Thomson M, Rao P, Rawat D, Wenzl TG. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired children. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 14;17(2):191-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i2.191.
Homan M, Mahkovic D, Orel R, Mamula P. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
Maple JT, Keswani RN, Hovis RM, Saddedin EZ, Jonnalagadda S, Azar RR, Hagen C, Thompson DM, Waldbaum L, Edmundowicz SA. Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.050. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CO2pegA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.