CO2 vs Air Insufflation in Children Undergoing PEG

NCT ID: NCT04714021

Last Updated: 2021-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-07

Study Completion Date

2023-01-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ap¬plications of CO2 insufflation for endoscopic procedures have been reported for the performance of routine colonoscopy, small bowel endoscopy, endoscopic retro¬grade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. These studies showed that CO2 insufflation reduces the post-procedural abdominal distension and pain without CO2 retention and adverse events. However, there has been no report on the safety and efficacy of CO2 insufflation in PEG procedures in adults or in children. In the present study, we would like to evaluate by randomized controlled trial: the safety of the CO2 insufflation during PEG and the inhibi¬tory effects of CO2 insufflation on bowel distension after PEG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ap¬plications of CO2 insufflation for endoscopic procedures have been reported for the performance of routine colonoscopy, small bowel endoscopy, endoscopic retro¬grade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. These studies showed that CO2 insufflation reduces the post-procedural abdominal distension and pain without CO2 retention and adverse events. However, there has been no report on the safety and efficacy of CO2 insufflation in PEG procedures in adults or in children. In the present study, we would like to evaluate by randomized controlled trial: the safety of the CO2 insufflation during PEG and the inhibi¬tory effects of CO2 insufflation on bowel distension after PEG.

The primary objective is to determine the safety of the CO2 insufflation during PEG. The secondary objective of this study is to investigate the inhibitory effect of CO2 insufflation on bowel distension.

This is an investigator initiated multicentre, randomized, double blind study to evaluate the safety and adverse events profile of CO2 insufflation during PEG procedure. The study included a screening, pre-intervention (pre-PEG) and a post-intervention time (after-PEG), with total of 4 measurements of waist circumference, two measurements of i-stat.

Children aged 0-19 years, who were admitted for PEG procedure and who meet all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria listed below. A total of 120 children after PEG insertion will be included and divided in two groups: one step group and standard pull group of children; two established groups will be randomized 1:1.

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients
* Age between 0 - 19 years
* Written informed consent Exclusion criteria
* Absolute contraindication for PEG procedure
* Patients with hypercapnia (pCO2 \> 50 mmHg at first i-stat measurement)
* Language barriers which do not allow to give informed consent Patient data will be collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), underlining disease, duration of procedure, type of procedure, type of the scope, type of sedation or anaesthesia, complications.

Due to study protocol capillary blood will be withdrawn twice. To conclude there are actually no additional risks for included children due to the study protocol. Moreover, we will be able to diagnose early the important pneumoperitoneum, if it will occur and start to treat it with effective pain killers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrostomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* single step PEG technique group divided to co2 or air insufflation group during endoscopy
* pull technique PEG group divided to co2 or air insufflation group during endoscopy
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single steep arm- CO2 insufflation

PEG will be performed by single step technique and CO2 will be insufflated during the endoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG

Single steep arm- air insufflation

PEG will be performed by single step technique and air will be insufflated during the endoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

air

Intervention Type OTHER

to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG

Pull technique arm- CO2 insufflation

PEG will be performed by pull technique and CO2 will be insufflated during the endoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG

Pull technique arm- air insufflation

PEG will be performed by pull technique and air will be insufflated during the endoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

air

Intervention Type OTHER

to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CO2

to insufflate CO2 into the stomach instead of air during the PEG

Intervention Type OTHER

air

to insufflate air into the stomach instead of CO2 during the PEG

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients indicated for PEG procedure
* Age between 0 - 19 years
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Absolute contraindication for PEG procedure
* Patients with hypercapnia (pCO2 \> 50 mmHg at first i-stat measurement)
* Language barriers which do not allow to give informed consent
Maximum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tadej Battelino

Professor of Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matjaz Homan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital in Ljubljana

Mike Thomson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sheffield Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Paediatric Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Children's Hospital Zagreb

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Policlinico Universitario Messina

Messina, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Children's Hospital

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status RECRUITING

University Children's Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital

Dubai, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Sheffield Children's Hospital

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Croatia Italy Slovenia Switzerland United Arab Emirates United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Matjaz Homan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0038640885848

Mike Thomson, PhD

Role: CONTACT

44 0114 271 7000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick Bontems

Role: primary

+32479624095

Iva Hojsak

Role: primary

+385914600342

Claudio Romano

Role: primary

Valeria Dipasquale

Role: backup

Matjaz Homan, PhD

Role: primary

Raoul Furlano

Role: primary

+41 79 469 60 69

Christis Tzivinikos

Role: primary

00971502148450

Mike Thomson

Role: primary

44 0114 271 7000

Zuzana Londt

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980 Dec;15(6):872-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80296-x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 6780678 (View on PubMed)

Thomson M, Rao P, Rawat D, Wenzl TG. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired children. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 14;17(2):191-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i2.191.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21245991 (View on PubMed)

Homan M, Mahkovic D, Orel R, Mamula P. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26363332 (View on PubMed)

Maple JT, Keswani RN, Hovis RM, Saddedin EZ, Jonnalagadda S, Azar RR, Hagen C, Thompson DM, Waldbaum L, Edmundowicz SA. Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.050. Epub 2009 Jun 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19523621 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CO2pegA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.