Mental Health Among Patients, Providers, and Staff During the COVID-19 Era
NCT ID: NCT04700137
Last Updated: 2024-01-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
666 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-18
2022-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will include:
Aim 1: a cross sectional survey to measure the prevalence of various measures of mental distress and how they are associated with COVID-19-related factors; and
Aim 2: a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two versions of a Caring Contacts intervention to reduce loneliness and mental distress.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Digital Mental Health Care for COVID-19 High-Risk Populations
NCT04964570
Prevention of Mental Health Problems Among Persons Without Personal Housing in the Context of the COVID-19 Epidemic
NCT05033210
Attitudes Towards Receiving Mental Health Care Using Telehealth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic
NCT04693052
Remotely Delivered Programs Targeting COVID-19 Stress-Related Depression and Substance Use
NCT04595084
Digital Mental Health Care for COVID-19 High-Risk Populations - Phase 2
NCT05826132
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that delivering the Caring Contacts intervention with an introductory phone call will yield better mental health outcomes than delivering the Caring Contacts intervention with no introductory phone call.
This will be the first published data directly comparing the effectiveness of two versions of the Caring Contacts intervention with individuals who report loneliness or other mental distress. The overall goal of the MHAPPS study is to better understand the mental health impact of COVID-19 and to determine how health systems can most effectively support mental health at scale among providers, staff, and patients in the COVID-19 era and beyond.
This research is being conducted by a team including health system-based researchers, clinicians, other frontline healthcare workers, and administrators; academic researchers; follow-up specialists and administrators at the Idaho Suicide Prevention Hotline, and an advisory board of people with lived experience with suicide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caring Contacts + Introductory Phone Call (CC+)
Healthcare provider and staff participants who are randomized to both caring text messages and an introductory phone call.
Adult and adolescent participants who are randomized to both caring text messages and an introductory phone call.
Caring Contacts Plus Introductory Phone Call (CC+)
One introductory semi-structured caring phone conversation with a follow-up specialist to check-in, establish a personal connection, and provide resources at the 0-2 week time-point followed by 11 non-demanding, caring text or email messages sent over the course of 6 months.
Caring Contacts (without phone call) (CC)
Healthcare provider and staff participants who are randomized to only caring text messages.
Adult and adolescent patient participants who are randomized to only caring text messages.
Caring Contacts without an introductory phone call (CC)
Eleven non-demanding, caring text or email messages sent over the course of 6 months. Participants will not know or have spoken to the follow-up specialist who sends the caring messages.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caring Contacts Plus Introductory Phone Call (CC+)
One introductory semi-structured caring phone conversation with a follow-up specialist to check-in, establish a personal connection, and provide resources at the 0-2 week time-point followed by 11 non-demanding, caring text or email messages sent over the course of 6 months.
Caring Contacts without an introductory phone call (CC)
Eleven non-demanding, caring text or email messages sent over the course of 6 months. Participants will not know or have spoken to the follow-up specialist who sends the caring messages.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provider or Employee at St. Luke's Health System
* Adults ≥ 18 years of age
* Proficient in spoken and written English language
* Patient at a St. Luke's Health System primary care site
* Current MyChart account user
* Adults ≥18 years of age
* Minors 12-17 years of age
* Proficient in spoken and written English language
Aim 2:
* Moderate or high score for loneliness, suicide ideation, psychological stress, anxiety, or depression:
* NIH Toolkit Loneliness raw score of 13 or greater or
* C-SSRS score of 3 or greater; or
* NIH Toolkit Perceived Stress raw score of 31 or greater for adults; or
* GAD7 score of 11 or greater; or
* PHQ9 score of 10 or greater
* Access to a phone for the duration of the study with the ability to receive text messages and phone calls
* Moderate or high score for loneliness, suicide ideation, psychological stress, anxiety, or depression:
* NIH Toolkit Loneliness raw score of 13 or greater for adults or 16 or greater for adolescents; or
* C-SSRS score of 3 or greater; or
* GAD7 score of 11 or greater; or
* PHQ9 score of 10 or greater; or
* NIH Toolkit Stress raw score of 31 or greater for adults or 33 or greater for adolescents
* \[Note: validated youth versions of the NIH Toolkit assessments (loneliness and perceived stress), and PHQ-A tools will be used for adolescents; the C-SSRS and GAD7 tools are validated for use with both adults and adolescents.\]
* Access to a phone for the duration of the study with the ability to receive text messages and phone calls
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent to participate
* Individuals who are study staff for this study or the SPARC Trial
* Individuals who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent to participate.
* Individuals who are participants in the SPARC Trial
* Individuals who have not had a primary care visit in the past 12 months
Aim 2:
* Individuals who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent to participate
* Individuals who are in acute crisis as determined by the person conducting the consent process
* Individuals who are study staff for this study or the SPARC Trial
* Individuals who are enrolled as participants in the SPARC comparative effectiveness clinical trial (SPARC Aim 1). Providers or employees who received training related to SPARC and/or who completed the SPARC provider satisfaction survey are not excluded from participating in MHAPPS
* Patients who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent/assent to participate (or whose legally authorized representative is unable or unwilling to provide consent in the case of adolescents). Examples may include but are not limited to patients who present with acute or chronic cognitive impairment that would preclude their ability to consent (i.e. acute psychosis, intoxication, or intellectual disability).
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Idaho Crisis & Suicide Hotline
OTHER
University of Washington
OTHER
St. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Radin
Applied Research Scientist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna K Radin, DrPH, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Luke's Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Luke's Health System
Boise, Idaho, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Radin AK, Shaw J, Brown SP, Torres J, Harper M, Flint H, Fouts T, McCue E, Skeie A, Pena C, Youell J, Doty-Jones A, Wilson J, Flinn L, Austin G, Chan KCG, Zheng Z, Fruhbauerova M, Walton M, Kerbrat A, Comtois KA. Comparative effectiveness of two versions of a caring contacts intervention in healthcare providers, staff, and patients for reducing loneliness and mental distress: A randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 15;331:442-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.029. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PCORI HIS-2018C3-14695
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20-0052
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.