Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Flow Cytometry in Excluding Bacteruria

NCT ID: NCT04686292

Last Updated: 2022-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

966 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A more rapid test for bacteriuria is desired. This will exclude the patients not having bacteriuria, which will contribute to a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care urine flow cytometry on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prerequisite for the appropriate use of antibiotics is timely access to accurate diagnostic tests, since treatment of acute infections should be initiated within a few hours to avoid serious complications such as bacteremia, sepsis, organ failure, septic shock and death.

The diagnosis of urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis (APN) is difficult due to often weak and non-specific symptoms and high incidence of asymptomatic bacteruria in especially elderly patients. The diagnosis is verified by significant bacteriuria in urine culture.

Unfortunately, the time from urine sample to result from urine cultures is more than 24 hours days. Urine test strips are unreliable with low specificity and low predictive values. Therefore, a point-of-care (POC) test is desired, which can provide rapid results and quickly identify a bacteriuria. One such tool may be urine flow cytometry (UFC), which has shown promising diagnostic value for the exclusion of bacteriuria with a high negative predictive value. However, better documentation for its use as an ED diagnostic screening method is needed.

The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of POC-UFC on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria? Our hypothesis is that by excluding patients not having bacteriuria, it will contribute to a more rapid and accurate diagnosis

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suspected infection

All patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected infections assessed by the receiving physician

urine flow cytometry

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diagnostic test of urine flow cytometry. A urine sample will be collected according to routine procedure by a study assistant. The sample will be divided into two aliquots; half for routine urine culturing, and half for Point-of-care Urine Flow cytometry (POC-UFC) analysis (UF-5000, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The analysis will be performed according to manufacturer's instruction and conducted by laboratory staff. Laboratory staff will be blinded to the participants diagnosis and outcome. The results of the POC-UFC analysis will not be visible to the treating physician.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

urine flow cytometry

Diagnostic test of urine flow cytometry. A urine sample will be collected according to routine procedure by a study assistant. The sample will be divided into two aliquots; half for routine urine culturing, and half for Point-of-care Urine Flow cytometry (POC-UFC) analysis (UF-5000, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The analysis will be performed according to manufacturer's instruction and conducted by laboratory staff. Laboratory staff will be blinded to the participants diagnosis and outcome. The results of the POC-UFC analysis will not be visible to the treating physician.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Suspicion of acute infections assessed by the receiving physician at the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

* If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
* Admission within the last 14 days
* Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
* Pregnant women
* Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 \<200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (\>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for \>14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Backer Mogensen

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital of Southern Jutland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of Southern Jutland

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Koves B, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Pickard R, Seisen T, Lam TB, Yuan CY, Bruyere F, Wagenlehner F, Bartoletti R, Geerlings SE, Pilatz A, Pradere B, Hofmann F, Bonkat G, Wullt B. Benefits and Harms of Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology Urological Infection Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):865-868. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28754533 (View on PubMed)

Herraez O, Asencio MA, Carranza R, Jarabo MM, Huertas M, Redondo O, Arias-Arias A, Jimenez-Alvarez S, Solis S, Zamarron P, Illescas MS, Galan MA. Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer to screen urinary tract infections: the URISCAM multicentre study. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;66(3):175-181. doi: 10.1111/lam.12832. Epub 2018 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29223137 (View on PubMed)

Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34593497 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHS-ED-12b-2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DIagnoSing Care hOme UTI Study
NCT05880329 RECRUITING