Avoiding Bacterial Contamination of Clean Catch Urine Cultures in Ambulatory Patients in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT03131609

Last Updated: 2020-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1471 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find the best cleaning and collection methods to obtain a 'non-contaminated' clean catch mid-stream urine sample to diagnose suspected urinary tract infection (UTI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a major public health issue resulting in more than 3-million visits to Emergency Departments in the United States each year. As part of the diagnostic work up, a sterile urine sample is requested for culture. The preferred urine specimen is a "Clean Catch Midstream Urine Sample". When patients are ambulatory and competent, this is a self-obtained specimen in a private bathroom. If the urine is not collected in a sterile manner the urine sample may be 'contaminated' by bacteria that originate from the skin or genital area, and not from the urinary tract. This is often described by the clinical laboratory as 'mixed growth bacteria'. A contaminated sample may lead to a false-positive urine culture result. In a non-contaminated urine specimen, only a single bacterial growth is identified as the source of the infection. Mixed bacterial flora with two or more microorganisms makes interpretation of the urine culture more difficult and prone to error. The American College of Pathologists has published results of national laboratory surveys on Urine Culture Contamination in 1998 and 2008 that document the scope of the problem.

SAMPLE: Adult ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a suspected UTI and have a urine culture ordered by a physician. A total of 2000 patients will be enrolled (500 per group). This is estimated to result in 600 urine samples (150 per group). Written consent is not normally required for a self-obtained urine sample. The study will be explained and participants will verbally consent or decline to participate, as approved by the Institutional Review Board.

SETTING: Emergency Department of an academic medical center.

METHOD: This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 4 groups that compare different patient self-cleaning and self-collection methods. All study supplies materials are commercially available in the United States. Each participant will be provided with study-specific visual aids for male or female participants and their randomly assigned group. The four groups are:

Group 1: Standard moist wipes and standard collection container. Group 2: Silver impregnated moist wipes and standard collection container. Group 3: Standard moist wipes and funnel collection container. Group 4: Silver impregnated moist wipes and funnel collection container. The urine samples will be sent to the Hospital Microbiology Laboratory for analysis. Urine samples with a positive leuk-esterase pre-screen will be sent for urine culture.

DATA ANALYSIS:This study is powered to detect a large effect size change in any study groups (2. 3. 4) compared with control (group 1). The sample size is sufficient to identify the method(s) with the lowest urine sample contamination rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Infections Bacteriuria Urinalysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A: Container + Castile-soap wipe

Sterile urine collection container and Castile-soap wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen - Control group represents usual care in the Emergency Department.

Container

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Castile-soap wipe

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

B: Container + Silver impregnated wipe

Sterile urine collection container and silver-impregnated cloth-wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen

Container

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Silver Impregnated Wipe

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

C: Funnel + Castile-soap wipe

Sterile urine collection funnel and Castile-soap wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen

Funnel

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Castile-soap wipe

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

D: Funnel + Silver-impregnated wipe

Urine collection funnel and sliver impregnated cloth-wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen

Silver Impregnated Wipe

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Funnel

Intervention Type OTHER

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Container

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Intervention Type OTHER

Silver Impregnated Wipe

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Intervention Type OTHER

Funnel

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Intervention Type OTHER

Castile-soap wipe

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Standard container for urine collection Theraworx Peezy Mid-stream urine collection kit

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of older
* Urine culture order by physician

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age
* Urinary catheter in place
* Not ambulatory
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EBLEN Charities

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Forte Medical Ltd.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Avadim Technologies, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mary Lough

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary E. Lough, PhD, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lough ME, Shradar E, Hsieh C, Hedlin H. Contamination in Adult Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Sep;45(5):488-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.06.001.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31445626 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

33879

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.