LOVE Trial: Limits On Vaginal Intercourse After Mid-urEthral Sling

NCT ID: NCT04680897

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-16

Study Completion Date

2024-09-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are no prospective, randomized studies addressing vaginal penetration restrictions following mid-urethral slings. There is a single cohort study examining expedited recovery following vaginal prolapse repair which advised 3-weeks of vaginal penetration restrictions. This study reported an earlier return to intercourse in the 3-week group than in the retrospectively collected control group where 6-weeks of restriction were advised. This study did not evaluate the impact of early versus later return to sexual activity on wound complications, mesh exposure rates, pain or satisfaction.

It is important to develop evidenced-based recommendations on post-operative sexual activity restrictions.

The purpose of this research study is to understand if the "standard" 6-week restriction on vaginal penetration/intercourse after mid-urethral sling affects patient satisfaction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women is 13.6%. Women are typically instructed to avoid strenuous physical activity and vaginal penetration for 6 weeks following synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures. The historical rationale behind these instructions was to prevent disruption of vaginal incisions, promote wound healing, decrease recurrence risk and prevent complications such as mesh exposure. Very little medical evidence exists, however, to support these activity restrictions which can have a negative impact on satisfaction and quality of life. Findings from a single randomized trial challenge standard activity restrictions following pelvic organ prolapse repair. Participants were given conservative or liberal postoperative instructions and the liberal group experienced fewer prolapse and urinary symptoms at 3 months postoperatively; but there was no difference in satisfaction between groups. This study, however, did not investigate restrictions on vaginal penetration (both groups adhered to 6-week restrictions) and was not specific to women undergoing isolated sling procedures. There are no prospective, randomized studies addressing vaginal penetration restrictions following mid-urethral slings. There is a single cohort study examining expedited recovery following vaginal prolapse repair which advised 3-weeks of vaginal penetration restrictions. This study reported an earlier return to intercourse in the 3-week group than in the retrospectively collected control group where 6-weeks of restriction were advised. This study did not evaluate the impact of early versus later return to sexual activity on wound complications, mesh exposure rates, pain or satisfaction.

Animal models suggest that wound healing occurs much sooner than 6 weeks post-surgery. In fact, epithelial wounds closed by primary intention typically re-epithelialize in just 24-48 hours. In a mouse-model with full-thickness vaginal injury, there was complete restoration of mucosal integrity by day 7 without surgical closure of the wound. Epithelial healing over mid-urethral sling could differ due to a known pro-inflammatory milieu in the setting of a mesh implant but the rate of epithelial closure over implanted synthetic mesh has not been specifically described. While earlier vaginal penetration could theoretically increase the risk of mesh exposure from the known baseline risk of 2-3%, this is unlikely following two weeks in a low risk population regardless of menopausal status. Vaginal atrophy has been identified as a risk factor for wound healing complications and vaginal mesh exposure and could interact with early resumption of intercourse. However, vaginal atrophy can be reversed with vaginal estrogen therapy and resultant risks mitigated.

Given the prevalence of mid-urethral slings for stress incontinence, it is important to develop evidenced-based recommendations on post-operative sexual activity restrictions. The purpose of this randomized trial, therefore, is to evaluate the impact of early (2 weeks) versus standard (6 weeks) removal of vaginal penetration restrictions in sexually active women undergoing mid-urethral sling procedures on sexual satisfaction and wound complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Satisfaction Female Sexual Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The "early" group will be given instructions that allow them to return to vaginal penetration/intercourse after 2 weeks. The "standard" group will be given postoperative instructions that allow them to return to intercourse after 6 weeks. Both groups will be able to return to other physical activities as they feel able
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Group

Participants may resume vaginal penetration at 6 weeks.

Group Type OTHER

Standard restriction recommendation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will return to intercourse after 6 weeks

Early Group

Participants may resume intercourse at 2 weeks

Group Type OTHER

Early restriction release

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will no longer have restrictions on vaginal penetration 2 weeks after surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early restriction release

Participants will no longer have restrictions on vaginal penetration 2 weeks after surgery.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard restriction recommendation

Participants will return to intercourse after 6 weeks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 21years of age
* Women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence who are undergoing a planned, isolated, synthetic mid-urethral sling with cystoscopy via retropubic, transobturator or single-incision approach.
* Sexually active with ≥1 male or female partner with a frequency of at least once every 2 weeks
* Ability to comprehend the concept of randomization
* Willing to remain compliant with the instructions and study follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* History of prior surgery for incontinence including mid-urethral sling, fascial sling
* History of prior surgery for prolapse with transvaginal mesh
* Diabetic with Hgb A1C ≥ 8.0 % (elevated A1C is associated with delayed wound healing12 and 8.0 has been identified as a cutoff over which there are more complications postoperatively13
* Pregnant
* Incarcerated
* History of pelvic radiation
* Current smoker (known risk factor for mesh exposure)
* Non-English speaker
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catherine A Matthews, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Atrium Health

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00070386

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of BufferGel in Women
NCT00000927 COMPLETED PHASE1